Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Mar 22, 2011James Blake is dubstep's crossover moment, rolling back the hostile skronk and centering on a croon that rivals Antony Hegarty for lovelorn beauty.
-
Mar 14, 2011With not a sound wasted, James Blake is everything we wanted James Blake to make.
-
Mar 2, 2011James Blake's most compelling moments come when you can't tell where he stops and the machines begin.
-
Mar 2, 2011Using lo-fi digital techniques to play up rough edges and raw emotion, Blake's rare talent is to make music so naked seem unshakable.
-
Feb 18, 2011Blake has managed to create something new, balancing his understated vocals with funky, dub beats, synthesizers and a vocoder.
-
Feb 18, 2011James Blake is an absolute treat for the ears.
-
Feb 18, 2011This is a piece of work that raises the bar for all his contemporaries, and I would not be surprised to see this album at the top of many Best of 2011 lists.
-
Feb 15, 2011James Blake transcends dubstep, and perhaps artificiality as a whole.
-
Feb 15, 2011What I do know is that at the center of the deafening hype is a fascinating debut, and having spent the last week immersed in it, I suppose I too am willing to invest a bit of hyperbole in James Blake, particularly if it helps convince you to invest a few hours with this uncommonly powerful album.
-
Feb 9, 2011Written, arranged, performed and recorded by Blake in his bedroom, the album isn't just a good collection of touching songs, it's a complete world of his own; a mood, a moment, a sound that's uniquely his. Just as a future classic should be.
-
Feb 9, 2011With this new LP -- released on a major label on both sides of the Atlantic, no less -- odds are, a lot of people are going to listen, and I don't mean in the tail-eating, blog-bite-blog sort of way.
-
Feb 8, 2011In James Blake, the squish-grooved London club throb called dubstep just got its very own emotive song stylist. Blake uses neosoul keyboards, blip beats and layered snips of his heart-starved warbling to create softly roiling slow jams.
-
Feb 8, 2011James Blake is an essential for anybody interested in witnessing how pop music can and will continue to change, progress, and grow into something new with time.
-
Feb 8, 2011The highlights here are subtle, but many.
-
Feb 8, 2011Even at its most impenetrable, the album leaves you in a state of charmed confusion: you frequently have no idea what's going to happen next – not exactly a sensation much current rock and pop evokes.
-
Feb 8, 2011In weaker moments he veers into mawkish troubadour territory, but Blake's musical alchemy can be capable of matching the urban, nocturnal beauty of vintage Massive Attack.
-
Feb 8, 2011Though it's an album of quiet dynamism with no actual audible screams, James Blake is certainly an album that invites its close listeners to fall in. It belongs to that very unique branch of avant-gardism, nee synthpop and soul (not so much dubstep), that invites in as it perplexes.
-
Feb 8, 2011Full of airy vocals and synths, the album sounds as if it could lift off at any moment if not for the drum thumps tethering it down. But the beats sound weighty only in contrast.
-
Feb 8, 2011His are fragile, beautiful songs floating over warmly alien, sometimes seemingly formless musical structures yet it's an effect borne through unconventional levels of space and patience.
-
Feb 8, 2011Aside from the hype, this album is by no means a feasible breakthrough into the mainstream--there's not stride enough for that. But when it's at its best, it's boundary-breaking.
-
Feb 7, 2011His first full album, James Blake, sounds as if it were made for an assignment in an electronic music course. It's a bit intellectual, a bit process-oriented and a bit undercooked.
-
Feb 7, 2011He achieves a lot with a little. He never gives us filler. He continues to innovate. He has provided us with a great album, one that is a sure sign his velocity has not been slowed.
-
Feb 7, 2011For those intransigent souls, there will always those three EPs to listen to. Everyone else can feel free to luxuriate in the wintry delights of this fine record.
-
Feb 7, 2011Built for repeat listening, this will keep on giving. Don't you just hate it when the hype is right?
-
Feb 7, 2011Truth first: James Blake is not a great record. It is a good record, and maybe even a slightly provocative one, in that an album this spare, minimal, and myopic shouldn't, by rights, be stirring the pot so much.
-
Feb 7, 2011The young studio maverick has given us something entirely new, but it's not perfect. It's not an inconsistent album, but it has a few unnecessary fillers. His unrestricted, deconstructed, sparse and minimal productions are unique and he deserves all the hype surrounding him.
-
The WireApr 28, 2011Like Portishead, this album may very well achieve background ubiquity, but that should not be allowed to obscure the strangeness and currency of this record. [Mar 2011, p.46]
-
Entertainment WeeklyApr 8, 2011An intriguing concept, not always fully realized. [1 Apr 2011, p.77]
-
MojoApr 6, 2011London singer-songwriter attempts to annex the middle ground between Benga and Anthony Hegarty. [March 2011, p. 96]
-
Q MagazineMar 1, 2011Haunting debut from post-dubstep pioneer. [March 2011, p. 113]
-
UncutFeb 15, 2011Like fellow minimalists The xx, Blake takes from dubstep an awareness of space and silence; he appreciates the power of a perfectly weighted pause. [Mar 2011, p.98]
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 148 out of 171
-
Mixed: 16 out of 171
-
Negative: 7 out of 171
-
Feb 9, 2011
-
Feb 19, 2011
-
Apr 3, 2011