• Record Label: Sony
  • Release Date: Apr 12, 2005
Metascore
46

Mixed or average reviews - based on 6 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 6
  2. Negative: 1 out of 6
  1. Ultimately Mudvayne gets lost between thrash and diluted Slipknot devotion.
  2. Q Magazine
    40
    They remain spirit-crushingly average. [May 2005, p.114]
  3. Syncopated sludge that will connect only with aging burnouts and the angriest of young 'uns.
  4. The album is, while not terrible, not very memorable, either.
User Score
7.2

Generally favorable reviews- based on 64 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 64
  2. Negative: 12 out of 64
  1. Jan 6, 2016
    0
    This band is like Ebola spreading around the world. It needs to stop.
  2. PatrikD.
    Apr 18, 2008
    10
    this album rocks, the score on here says nothing a metalhead does know when an album is good a this is brilliant, these guys sure can play this album rocks, the score on here says nothing a metalhead does know when an album is good a this is brilliant, these guys sure can play not like the most of the artist on first position here 100% Full Review »
  3. EricL.
    Feb 23, 2008
    9
    MAN it drives me crazy when critics write Mudvayne off! Their last two albums have been clever and experimental in ways it seems (to me) hard MAN it drives me crazy when critics write Mudvayne off! Their last two albums have been clever and experimental in ways it seems (to me) hard to notice - are critics even listening to this stuff before they rate it? This group is a lot smarter than people give them credit for; just listen to the clash between all instruments. The guitar, bass, and drums each go their own way and come together for the grooviest of grooves. And obviously the fans on this website gave it a 7.9/10, so what gives? What bias to critic associations have? Full Review »