Lullabies To Paralyze
- Queens of the Stone Age
- Band Name: Queens of the Stone Age
- Record Label: Interscope
- Release Date: Mar 22, 2005
User Score
8.6
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 100 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 95 out of 100
-
Mixed: 3 out of 100
-
Negative: 2 out of 100
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
VladaJAug 15, 200710for me this is best album ever,best album of 2007, although i spent lot of time listening to it end i'm finding that this album can't be likeable at first,and you realy must like QOTSA...so if someone say that he realy listens them and say that he don't like that album,then i can understand... QOTSA FAN
-
-
ChrisGMar 22, 20059
-
-
Dr.D.Mar 21, 20059
-
-
JohnnyFeelgoodMar 25, 20059The engineering/production is HORRIBLE. The songs are BRILLIANT. This could have been a classic album, but the engineers/mixers/masterers screwed it up. This is the real issue here. The songs, themselves, are much better than the songs on Songs for the Deaf.
-
-
JohnBMar 26, 200510I am a Queens fan since the beginning and Homme's talents never cease to amaze me. I thought Songs for the Deaf couldn't be topped but I am now thinking twice. I wonder if Homme thought the same when he included a DVD of the making of the album with the release.
-
-
MytasteinmusicisbetterthanyoursMar 30, 200510
-
-
NadiaCMar 30, 200510I thought this album was realy well done. I was expecting it to be weak because of Nick Oliveri's absence, but low and behold QOTSA never fail to deliver. A song I really liked on the album was "in my head", did anyone else find the guitar riffs on that song amazingly catchy?
-
-
declanMApr 20, 20059I have been into these guys since kyuss way back before they were popular have all the sessions this album rocks but it does miss the nick ingredient apart from that a cool stoner album have to say one thing kyuss sound more accomplished and more experimental just listen to sky valley wow heavy man.
-
-
brettMay 29, 20059Brilliant,moody,great record.. Should have been 3 songs shorter for consistancy and as a WHOLE body of work. Great wriring !!!!
-
-
EdCAug 5, 200510Brilliant, hard rocking, ultimate awesomeness! And who doesn't want more cowbell? Lullabies is a masterpiece, almost surpassing Songs. Sheer and obscene awesomeness.
-
-
LucasSSep 17, 200510best ever
-
-
NickLAug 23, 200610A great, haunting album that isn't for everyone but if you are into the style you will love it.
-
-
RosscoePJun 20, 200710when i first got this album, to tell the truth, i was alittle upset, becasue it hought this was songs for the deaf, but after listening to it, i must say, i think this is their best album
-
-
sMOct 14, 20059Sexy as hell....
-
-
PaulMMar 22, 20059
-
-
GoranSMar 23, 20059An excellent album, Very mystical. The album just flows perfectly and gives you music-orgasm sometimes. Great riffs and choruses. Not better then Songs for the deaf but very, very close.
-
-
CameronRMar 24, 20059very great cd. Ive been listening to queens of the stone age for about 3 years now and this is my sexcond fav album.(Behind the famous songs for the deaf). Great if your a rock fan get it even if your not get it.
-
-
RandyHMar 25, 20059
-
-
SeanWMar 25, 200510Not as excellent as 'Songs for the Deaf' (which on a scale of 1-10 was a 12) but still rocks harder than anything else you're gonna hear on the radio without a rap beat or emo screaming
-
-
JohnnoMar 27, 20059
-
-
GaryMMar 29, 20059at times it's softer than previous efforts but still an excellent album.
-
-
jamesrMar 29, 20059not as good as songs for the dea,f but still has its own brilliant style and is still way ahead of everything else
-
-
EricRMar 29, 20059Maybe not quite as good as Songs for the Deaf, but a strong album all the same. Maybe it's because they opened their show with "Someone's in the Wolf", but I really love that song despite multiple reviews dismissing it as "limp." With a few more listens, I might put this album equal with Rated R and Songs for the Deaf.
-
-
DaxxRMar 30, 200510Another Josh road trip, with lost love, sadness and tones of lullabies which will paralyze every nerve ending.
-
-
JohnRApr 6, 200510It kills and you know it. Like Josh says "We could come off sounding like Slayer, and people would still be saying 'their edge is gone'. Bull! This chugs in all the right places while ending up even more eclectic and strange than the similar Rated R. As fun, innovative and loud as any rock out there.
-
-
RyanLApr 9, 200510Anyone who didn't think this worth the cash, need only listen to "Burn The Witch" a few times on a friends CD, cuz you know your friends got it. The layered guitar riffs, melodic vocals, blending Homme, Billy Gibbons, and Lanegan in a alto, soprano, whiskey-drinking smoker trio that bring life to words that are so simple. Go ahead. Prove me wrong. I dare you.
-
-
MarkMay 19, 20059This is another fine effort from the queens, with this album being far darker than some their earlier albums. The album obviously lacks the explosiveness that Nick Oliveri brought to the group, but with tracks as amazing as 'Someone's In The Wolf', who actually cares? Brilliant.
-
-
DorJun 24, 20059Fantastic.
-
-
jenMar 21, 200710this is one of the greatest albums of my time if you are in any doubt buy it put it in the cd player of your car head out to the country with a pack of marlboros and a few friends and go for it. thats what this album is all about
-
-
MarkK.Feb 8, 20089These lullabies indeed paralyze with pure brilliance.
-
-
KarlipattickNiotNov 27, 20059Go read about how awesome "Songs for the Deaf" is. Now, imagine all that extreme coolness that everyone regards "Songs.." with, but then imagine somthing even COOLER. That something cooler is "Lullabies to Paralyze," child, and it's gonna eat you alive. And you'll probably like it. I know I do.
-
-
KeytonEMar 22, 200510If you're a Queens fan, this album is amazing. Forget all this crap about mediocrity, this is the Queens at their best.
-
-
KristjanHMar 23, 200510Agreed, Keyton E... Queens at their best. Start to finish a very solid album.
-
-
aaronmMar 24, 20059
-
-
EricBMar 27, 200510There is alot of great stuff going on in "Lullabies." It is vastly different than "Songs for the Deaf." (not nearly as hard, AKA, no Dave Grohl) "Lullabies" is more of a mystical, multi-layered album. It took me a couple of listens to get into, but I'm already liking it better than anything they have ever done. Give it a chance, and you'll be pleasantly surprised.
-
-
jefffApr 12, 20069Brilliant. Josh Homme is a real genius.The best album of 2005.
-
-
The macho posturing can get obnoxious.... That said, anyone looking for a band that can mix and match metal, blues, thrash, punk, psychedelia, and grunge as the mood suits will be floored by Lullabies. [25 Mar 2005, p.70]
-
It's the tension between Homme's conflicting impulses that pressurizes Lullabies to Paralyze's highest points and accounts for its lows.
-
60Sounds routine, obscure without much mystery. [Apr 2005, p.124]