Peeping Tom
- Peeping Tom
- Band Name: Peeping Tom
- Record Label: Ipecac
- Release Date: May 30, 2006
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
90Put 'Peeping Tom' on the stereo and it's as slickly dark and eminently devourable as Hip-Hop with R&B overtones can be, though whack it on the headphones and you're introduced to something infinitely superior.
-
It works equally as a setting for his quieter moments (the tropical "Caipirinha") and for the melodic vocal rages that defined Faith No More's hits. [4 Jun 2006]
-
80While poppier and more accessible than his albums fronting Fantomas, it's worth the wait. [Jul 2006, p.104]
-
80The most palatable Mike Patton project to date. [Jun 2006, p.113]
-
It's quite possibly Patton's most accessible album since his Faith No More days.
-
There's hardly a stinker in the bunch. [Jul 2006, p.206]
-
While I would put this work near the bottom among Patton's opus, there are still some definitely enjoyable songs.
-
70Patton is either a musical genius or one lucky mad scientist. [3 Jun 2006]
-
70Peeping Tom succeeds (and wildly so, I might add) in the songs where Patton allows himself to succumb, if ever so slightly, to his more experimental tendencies.
-
62For all the great ideas and fantastic moments sprinkled throughout Peeping Tom, it turns out that Mike Patton's idea of pop is as uncompromising as his other musical notions. In this case, what's great in theory doesn't work so well in practice.
-
60Many of the collaborations are jarring. [Jul 2006, p.115]
-
Yields plenty of oddly seductive moments. [10 Aug 2006, p.99]
-
The end result sounds much like the Red Hot Chili Peppers produced by Massive Attack.
-
It holds some charms, but Peeping Tom is overshadowed by Patton's previous work.
-
Peeping Tom's almost exclusively synth-oriented songs (save the occasional bass and guitar) are ostensibly intended to highlight Patton's voice. This only accentuates his overwrought yet indifferent performances, however.
-
Once you get past the shock tactics, Peeping Tom is little more than a pile of dated Linkin Park-style sludge. [2 Jun 2006, p.83]
-
Given his abrasive experimentations with Mr. Bungle and Fantômas, his fascination with mildly skewed beatscapes is a surprise, fun but passé. [29 May 2006]
-
The effect is as scattershot as the guest list.
-
40Only the faithful need apply. [Jul 2006, p.101]
-
30A floundering mess that bores you to tears.
-
Past a handful of listens this becomes quickly uninspired.
-
A collection of infantile, forgettable stripper anthems and not even guest spots from Rahzel or Kid Koala can keep this shit from sounding like Linkin Park.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 20 out of 23
-
Mixed: 1 out of 23
-
Negative: 2 out of 23
-
JoshC0
-
IllmaticNaS10
-
Marie-PierreP10EXCELLENT!!!! Very original...very Mike Patton!