User Score
8.6
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 10 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 10 out of 10
-
Mixed: 0 out of 10
-
Negative: 0 out of 10
Review this album
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
DigbyIgbySep 27, 200210Dude, without a doubt!
-
-
RomulusFeb 3, 20059A Fabulous Album
-
-
KentM.Apr 29, 20028Not brilliant, but very good, very catchy, and, undoubtedly, will go overlooked as much of LUNA's work does....relatively that is.
-
-
BrendanY.May 3, 20028Smooth and bittersweet, this album marks a welcomed upward swing for a group caught in the midst of a slow downward spiral. While not as lyrically clever or musically textured as the band's best work, Romantica is pleasant and refreshing nonetheless.
-
-
VoldavD.Mar 19, 20047Listen, 'tis good. But in the Luna catalogue -- in the shadow of such tall trees as 'Penthouse', 'Pup Tent', and 'Bewitched' -- it leaves much to be desired. Second-tier Luna. Still, it is Luna, it is Dean Wareham, its great.
-
-
JudsonGOct 13, 20029
-
-
JayS.Oct 24, 20029It's too bad that Metacritic is not rating Close Cover Before Striking: an equally brilliant EP culled from the sessions of this fantastic LP.
-
-
MattP.Apr 27, 20028Same 'ol Luna
-
-
PatrickF.Apr 23, 20029Although Romantica is no Penthouse the album features some lighter more pleasant melodies than Luna fans are used to. Lovedust, Renee is Crying, and Mermaid Eyes are sure to please even the most casual Luna fan.
-
-
PerryB.May 14, 20029
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
70Fans of the group's early work might find the album a bit trying at first, but it's still the same old group for the most part.
-
Romantica charges out of the gate with a new vigor, brightness, and sensitivity that, in retrospect, hasn't really come together within one package for them since maybe Bewitched.
-
60Romantica is Luna's most energetic record ever. Which isn't saying much. [Apr/May 2002, p.115]