Slick Dogs And Ponies - Louis XIV
User Score
6.1 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 31 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 31
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 31
  3. Negative: 11 out of 31

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. JWest
    Apr 2, 2008
    3
    I wouldn't agree with the piece of shit comment but it is a pretty bad attempt at jumping on the Jet bandwagon. I loved Air Traffic Control which is what made me buy it. However, after several tries, I have failed to understand how an American band can sound so British. Most of it sucks. I would recommend downloading ATC from Itunes or something and saving your money.
  2. KyleF
    Feb 13, 2008
    10
    Kyle Funks gay, white power.
  3. Brennan
    Feb 24, 2008
    3
    I agree that this album was a huge let-down compared to the freshness and energy they displayed on their debut album.
  4. RoseS.
    Mar 7, 2008
    9
    I loved their first album, and I think "Slick Dogs and Ponies" is a fantastic album. I don't understand all the hate some of these people are spewing, but it's completely uncalled for. It's just good fun...people need to lighten up.
  5. KrestS.
    Mar 7, 2008
    0
    This is one of the worst albums I've ever heard. The only people who would defend it, don't want to admit they wasted their money on this awful album.
  6. PerroL.
    Feb 13, 2008
    10
    The album is great.
  7. SemolinaP.
    Feb 14, 2008
    2
    Absolutely awful. After the remarkably brilliant tone of their first album, this feels forced, disingenuous and completely flat. One or 2 songs almost catch your ear but this band has either sold out, or traded their bravado for estrogen pills *yack*. Stop trying to change with the times and do what you are good at...
  8. Kiru
    Feb 22, 2008
    8
    What the hell is up with the rating? Seriously, this one doesn't deserve it.
  9. JimmyT.
    Feb 23, 2008
    10
    Best album of the 2000's
  10. AdamMacD.
    Mar 22, 2008
    10
    I cannot understand why more people aren't blown away by this record. It has revealed an evolution in the band, a prgression from sexy flirtatiousness to a lovely dirty, sexy cynicism that retains the flavour of the previous record, while taking a huge (but successful) gamble in a different direction. The strings arrangements are brilliant as well, and further demonstrate the chops these fine young gentlemen possess, and as is brashly evident in their live performances.… Expand
  11. JoeyBagofDonuts
    Mar 29, 2008
    10
    This is a great album.
  12. JimmyJ.
    Mar 5, 2008
    1
    Utter Shite. A one trick pony should stick to what they know best, and that's not saying a lot. Biggest dissapointment of 2008 so far.
  13. LennyF.
    Mar 6, 2008
    8
    I love this band. It's rock n roll. All sleaze and decadence. What do the critics not understand about that?
  14. DickW.
    Feb 14, 2008
    0
    This is hands down the worst music piece ever! it was so bad it gave me cancer and made my ears bleed!
  15. MyturB.
    Feb 14, 2008
    0
    The CD made me feel like a piece of shit wrapped in tin foil! I would rather be molested as a child by Micheal Jackson then ever listen to this CD again.
  16. MichaelM.
    Feb 14, 2008
    9
    while not as good as their first, this album still becomes great after a few listens. sometimes you just want to, what an awesome track.
  17. WarrenM
    Feb 19, 2008
    10
    This is much better than their first album - I can't understand all the poor reviews. It's consistently tuneful and exciting. I guess that's it's downfall for all those who prefer their "indie rock" to be a tuneless, pretentious, overlong mess....
  18. JohnL.
    Feb 23, 2008
    0
    It still makes me laugh!!!!!!!!
  19. MarcusB.
    Feb 27, 2008
    6
    Not as good as their debut, but I still enjoyed it. They certainly sound like they're going for a more radio-friendly sound; it's unfortunate, but a few great songs make up for the stinkers.
  20. JasonT.
    Mar 27, 2008
    8
    I normally listen to hip-hop but I went to Chicago to see my cousin perform in his band (What Made Milwaukee Famous)...these guys sounded great live and I think it deserves at least a 6 or 7

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
37 out of 100

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 10 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 10
  2. Mixed: 6 out of 10
  3. Negative: 4 out of 10
  1. Hartford Courant
    40
    The San Diego rockers haven’t completely reined in their runaway libidos on Slick Dogs and Ponies, but they stray from the devilish attitude that made their brazen dirty talk such a riot.
    Read full review
  2. Pitchfork
    25
    The slightly more dynamic Louis XIV only give you testosterone-fueled rock at its least appealing extremes: heedless lust or, arguably even more repulsive, cheesy balladry.
    Read full review
  3. Rolling Stone
    40
    There's still too much of Brian Karscig's ultracampy 'Big Balls'--style vocals, and it sometimes feels like these guys have confused expanding their range with finding new sources to rip off.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »