- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Stephen Malkmus sounds like a great unmade Pavement album polished to within an inch of its life.
-
This is silly stuff, obviously, but it's a welcome return to the giddy wit that had dimmed as Pavement tried to contort itself into a conventional rock band.
-
Exactly the unpredictable effort you'd expect, it utilizes a new bunch of Portland buddies to render the old noises into background music as it explores such themes as Yul Brynner's makeover and piracy on the coast of Montenegro.
-
RevolverMalkmus remains up to his usual trickery, packing the proceedings with musical plot twists like false starts, abrupt fades, and fake codas. [#4, p.106]
-
Beyond the bookish lyrics, Malkmus has composed an album of brilliant songs, with creative intros, off-kilter arrangements, and well-placed effects.
-
Alternative PressEverything here is so enjoyable that it really doesn't matter that the man who helped give birth to the whole lo-fi movement has embraced a certain level of maturity. [March 2001, p.76]
-
It will remind you that Stephen Malkmus is one hell of a songwriter, whether you like him or not.
-
A swell record: personal but easy-going, distinctive, with a lot of picaresque personal narratives occasionally conveyed through exaggerated fantasy elements.
-
No, it's not quite the same as another Pavement album, but its literate, funny eclecticism is almost as irresistible.
-
Stephen Malkmus' solo debut is as mature, focused, and charming as it is rambunctious.
-
As accessible and eccentric as any album from Pavement's catalog...
-
There are two immediately apparent differences between Stephen Malkmus and Pavement's catalog: first and least surprisingly, there's less of a group dynamic here than on Pavement albums. It definitely has the sonic hallmarks of a "solo" album-- the songs are less jammy and spontaneous, more rigidly structured. Second, it's a lot more fun-sounding than Pavement was near the end of its shelf life.
-
An accessible, if far from revolutionary, work.
-
Throughout, there's little doubting Malkmus's charisma as a performer...
-
Most people will deem this album a significant piece of work, and maybe if you haven't heard much Pavement then it is.
-
His solo debut, Stephen Malkmus, doesn't sound so different from late-period Pavement, but at least he's regained his smart-ass swagger.
-
The new disc has a feeling of renewal, a sense of freedom, and perhaps even fun.
-
The WireThe album is not so much a departure as a continuation of Pavement, satisfying and occasionally inspired. [#205, p.59]
-
But, despite the added highlights of obscure noise effects and spaced-out keyboards, you can't help but notice that the music seems, at times, to lose a bit of momentum on certain tracks, serving as merely a backdrop for Malkmus' spontaneous bursts of guitar improvisation and catchy hooks.
-
Strangely engaging.
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 11 out of 13
-
Mixed: 1 out of 13
-
Negative: 1 out of 13
-
timeOct 26, 2007
-
franziskasFeb 23, 2003i love that album and i can´t understand why so many people find it and S.M. boring. i think he´s and will never be boring!!
-
DaveC.Dec 28, 2001Frees malkmus of the limitations of being in Pavement with definitely a more personal sound (guitar solo's et al)