Buy Now
| Buy on |
|
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Apr 20, 2011A rewarding indie-pop set that's as warm and comforting as a hot water bottle at the end of a bed.
-
Apr 20, 2011Goldberg, though, ought not to be penalised for his occasional switch of stance and self-leniency: this is an album that may not grace millions of record collections, but may well enjoy classic status in those that it does.
-
Apr 20, 2011The understated quality shows off his talents in a positive light, but presumably, Espinoza helped out in this way.
-
MojoMay 18, 2011This stuff is not only good, it's (mostly) weirdly good. [May 2011, p.106]
-
Apr 20, 2011The shorter production time of this album is perhaps reflected in the lack of variety. Of these ten songs, pretty much all of them are piano-or-guitar-led lamentations that veer conservatively in tone from vaguely melancholy to vaguely upbeat (more of the former than the latter).
-
Under The RadarApr 20, 2011The songs are thoughtful without thinking too much of themselves. [Feb 2011, p.64]
-
Apr 20, 2011It shows his restless ambition as an artist, but not his ability to make a great, lasting musical statement.
-
Q MagazineApr 20, 2011The Sisters' eponymous first release throws up the unlikely comparison of John Lennon fronting The Flaming Lips, only to result in something that's too unfocused and self-indulgent to be more than a passing curiosity. [Mar 2011, p.116]