Two Against Nature
- Steely Dan
- Band Name: Steely Dan
- Record Label: Warner Brothers
- Release Date: Feb 29, 2000
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
Their ensemble sound remains sharp and inimitable.
-
The music turns Aja's fusion-pop mode jumpier and snappier, sourer and trickier and less soothing--postfunk, whether anyone will admit it or not.
-
80Two Against Nature marks a timely return of two chilly, heartless hipsters.
-
The most surprising thing about the album is that it sounds exactly like classic Steely Dan, but without feeling dated.
-
80They've produced a demanding slice of music, brilliantly out of sync in an age of quick fixes and plummeting attention spans.
-
80Becker and Fagen seem to have found their happy place during the recording of Two Against Nature. And as it's presented on this extremely infectious collection, their joy is contagious.
-
80Sharp, sleek, sophisticated, more going on (jazzy horns, juicy backing vocals, switchblade rock guitar) than a couple of spins can take in and seductive enough to keep drawing you back.
-
Familiar-sounding as these songs may be, they function as well as any blend of jazz and rock...
-
Once more, we're in a world of uptight, high-gloss grooves, wry tales of dirty old men, and, of course, terrifyingly proficient guitar solos.
-
What makes Two Against Nature work isn't its cerebral ellipticity but its stunning musical clarity.
-
70Unfortunately, timelessness does not always equate with flawlessness.... it is all a little too pristine and sanitized for someone's protection...
-
50While Two Against Nature certainly has its moments, it doesn't catch your ear with the crafty songsmith of Steely Dan past.
-
16The lengthy, indistinguishable tracks could pass for a Daniel Lanois-produced collaboration between the Dave Matthews Band and Kenny G.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 6 out of 6
-
Mixed: 0 out of 6
-
Negative: 0 out of 6
-
JohnL9
-
KristianT9
-
JonathanH6Not bad, but forgettable