Metacritic Film

From Hell

Starring Johnny Depp, Heather Graham, Ian Holm, Robbie Coltrane, Susan Lynch, and Ian Richardson

MPAA RATING: R for strong violence/gore, sexuality, language and drug content

20th Century Fox Film Corporation
Suspense/Thriller
137 minutes | Color
Czech Republic / USA
Released In Theaters October 19, 2001

Based on a popular graphic novel, From Hell puts an intense psychological spin on the horrific legend of Jack the Ripper and unravels a chilling alleged conspiracy involving the highest powers in England. (Twentieth Century Fox)

WRITTEN BY
Terry Hayes
Rafael Yglesias
Alan Moore and Eddie Campbell (comic book series)

DIRECTED BY
Albert Hughes
Allen Hughes

Overall Metascore

This is a weighted, normalized average of all individual scores given by critics, on a scale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

54 / 100

Critic Reviews

100 Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Sensational and accomplished.
88 New York Post Lou Lumenick
Gripping and stylish thriller.
80 LA Weekly F. X. Feeney
Their discretion makes From Hell less a horror movie than a classical film noir.
80 Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Ambitious, visually stunning and hugely accomplished.
80 Variety Derek Elley
Surprisingly conventional Olde London Towne gaslight mystery, gussied up with some doctored visuals, and an eccentric performance by Johnny Depp.
80 New Times (L.A.) Gregory Weinkauf
A visionary breakthrough for the young directors, a darkly alluring and largely successful attempt to crowd the territory of Roman Polanski and Dario Argento.
80 Village Voice J. Hoberman
Superbly shot around Prague -- From Hell is even more stylish than gruesome -- it has the lush decrepitude of an autumn compost heap or an old Hammer werewolf flick.
75 San Francisco Chronicle Bob Graham
Mystery skillfully evokes Victorian London's dark depths.
75 Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
The movie works well as a straight-out horror yarn, proving that the Hughes Brothers are more versatile than their previous "ghetto pictures" suggest.
75 Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
The movie feels dark, clammy and exhilarating -- it's like belonging to a secret club where you can have a lot of fun but might get into trouble.
75 Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Depp gives yet another introspective, slightly mopey performance -- Graham never begins to act (and never has begun, as far as I know). But they're surrounded by an authentic, first-rate English cast.
70 Washington Post Stephen Hunter
It's not a great movie by any means, but it grips tighter than a chokehold and it cuts as deep as a knife.
67 Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
A tug-of-war between a bracing vision of a truly infernal crime spree -- complete with engaging whodunit storytelling -- and a sometimes clumsy period drama.
67 Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
It's by far the most violent, most clinical and most sumptuously atmospheric.
63 New York Daily News Jack Mathews
An amazing physical specimen, beautifully photographed and edited. If you think of it as your own opium dream, you may dismiss the lousy story as a mere side effect.
60 Mr. Showbiz Cody Clark
The movie's most glaring flaw is that the brothers and their screenwriters, Terry Hayes and Rafael Yglesias, don't manage to preserve the secret of the Ripper's identity for nearly as long as they intend to.
60 The New York Times A.O. Scott
So beautifully realized as a mood piece that it takes a while for a slight disappointment to register.
60 TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
An astonishing act of synthesis, bringing together disparate Ripper theories and a fiercely idiosyncratic version of London's history, architecture, policing and social structure.
50 USA Today Staff [Not Credited]
With almost as many subplots as corpses, the movie maintains its mild watchability only because the Ripper saga still engrosses.
50 Chicago Reader Lisa Alspector
Labyrinthine yet oversimple, the story seems to hide a more provocative one. But perhaps this is the nature of the beast.
50 Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
There's no bite or sting, nor is there a single moment when the film is anything close to scary. It isn't ever engaging, either; it's a dull, sluggish bum-out.
50 Chicago Tribune Mark Caro
Lacks the energy and urgency of its source material.
40 Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
A visual tour-de-force; it's just that there's not much else to sink your teeth into once the pretty colors fade from view.
40 Film Threat Heather Wadowski
Could have been a beautiful and suspenseful thriller, lukewarm performances make the film just another movie to add to one's "rent-it-when-it-comes-to-DVD" list.
40 Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
It is deeply unpleasant to see women abducted, tortured and eviscerated by a methodical and meticulous butcher.
38 Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
A visionary sort of horror movie should ponder three words: "Bram Stoker's Dracula."
38 Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
Feels stagy, stiff and entirely unnecessary.
38 Boston Globe Jay Carr
What the Hughes brothers have come up with is, to borrow another phrase from that bygone age, a penny dreadful.
30 Salon.com Charles Taylor
A brain-dead version of a dark and complex work.
30 New York Magazine Peter Rainer
The only note of authenticity in the movie comes from Ian Holm, playing the royal physician. What is this nuanced performance -- at least until the final fireworks -- doing in this twaddle?
20 Washington Post Desson Thomson
Feels razor thin. None of the characters is particularly noteworthy. And the revelations of deep-seated conspiracy in the usual privileged, closed circles are hackneyed and tired.
20 Rolling Stone Peter Travers
The Hughes boys blow it by burying a fine cast -- Robbie Coltrane as a cop and Ian Holm as a royal sawbones are standouts -- in stock scares, sappy romance and cliches that really are from hell.

CLOSE THIS WINDOW

©2006 CNET Networks Inc. All rights reserved.