Metacritic Film

Bats

Starring Lou Diamond Phillips, Dina Meyer, and Leon

MPAA RATING: R for some graphic, bloody bat attacks

Sony / Columbia
Suspense/Thriller
91 minutes | Color
USA
Released In Theaters October 22, 1999

Swarms of genetically altered bats blaze a path of terror through a sleepy Texas town. The only hope to stop the growing tide of devastation is a zoologist who studies bats (Meyer), her assistant (Leon), and the local sheriff (Phillips). (Destination Films)

WRITTEN BY
John Logan

DIRECTED BY
Louis Morneau

Overall Metascore

This is a weighted, normalized average of all individual scores given by critics, on a scale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

23 / 100

Critic Reviews

50 Variety
Smoothly maneuvering within the limitations of genre conventions, Bats emerges as a vigorously paced and surprisingly satisfying piece of work.
50 Chicago Tribune
Perfect late-summer drive-in fare.
50 Baltimore Sun
In its own B-film, let's-make-them-jump-out-of-their-seats way, Bats is quite the hoot.
50 Mr. Showbiz
A sleek rip-off of "The Birds" that is fast, furious, and watchable, but lacking in the two elements most essential to a silly screamfest like this: scares and laughs.
42 Entertainment Weekly Doug Brod
The kind of rote schlocker that rarely makes it to big screens anymore.
40 LA Weekly
Overlong, hard look at the perils of tampering with Creation.
40 TV Guide
A straight-faced throwback to the glory days of mutant wildlife on the rampage.
38 Philadelphia Inquirer
If you are unlucky enough to stray into the presence of Bats, I strongly recommend you follow their wise example. Hang from the ceiling and go to sleep.
38 New York Daily News Robert Dominguez
Unfortunately, it isn't until the final scene -- a spoof of the horror genre's false-ending cliché -- that Bats really takes wing.
38 USA Today
Really just an update of the kind of hapless grade-Z effort that once played the bottom half of a drive-in double bill.
35 TNT RoughCut
Everything in it is old bat.
30 Los Angeles Times
So uninvolving it scarcely matters what it looks like.
30 Film.com
Pours on some of the most ridiculous dialogue heard in a feature film in a long time.
30 Film.com
So campy...may be good for a few laughs.
25 Miami Herald Phoebe Flowers
Dumb cliches run amok.
25 Christian Science Monitor
Violent and vapid, but the visual jolts may please horror buffs.
25 San Francisco Examiner
A dimwitted, fill-in-the-blanks horror opus that slanders a fine and useful mammal.
25 Boston Globe
A reassuring little cheeseball of a movie.
25 San Francisco Chronicle
Falls apart immediately, then limps on for 45 minutes more.
25 New York Post
Not especially scary or funny, this lame comedy-thriller wastes a decent cast in a plodding tale.
20 The New York Times
Cause for fright in only one respect: the possibility that it could spawn sequels.
20 Dallas Observer M. V. Moorhead
A work of hilarious, nearly Ed Wood-worthy ineptitude.
10 Film.com
An amazing compendium of dumb behavior, bad dialogue, and incoherent direction.
10 Washington Post
Hopeless rip-off of Hitchcock's "The Birds."
10 Chicago Reader
All I saw were unimpressive digital effects; artless, quick-cut abstracted gore; and a last-ditch attempt to evoke a visceral response by heaping the climactic scene with bat shit.
0 Austin Chronicle
It's relentlessly bad in a way that just makes those theatre seats plain uncomfortable.

CLOSE THIS WINDOW

©2009 CNET Networks Inc. All rights reserved.