Metacritic Film

Color Me Kubrick

Starring John Malkovich, Marisa Berenson, Jim Davidson, Richard E. Grant, and Terence Rigby

MPAA RATING: Not Rated

Magnolia Pictures
Comedy  |  Drama  |  Foreign
86 minutes | Color
UK / France
Released In Theaters March 23, 2007

John Malkovich stars as the notorious Stanley Kubrick imposter Alan Conway in Color Me Kubrick.

WRITTEN BY
Anthony Frewin (story)

DIRECTED BY
Brian W. Cook

Overall Metascore

This is a weighted, normalized average of all individual scores given by critics, on a scale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

57 / 100

Critic Reviews

83 Christian Science Monitor
Color Me Kubrick is a far more modest movie, but in some ways is more successful than "The Hoax" in conveying how deeply people want to believe something is true against all evidence.
80 Variety
A sly, enormously entertaining romp based on the antics of real-life Brit conman Alan Conway who rooked his way around '90s London posing as Stanley Kubrick.
80 Washington Post
Color Me Kubrick is like a nice, deep, clear cocktail of ammonia on the rocks: bracing, comic, astonishing, all of which hide its poison center.
75 Entertainment Weekly
The film reveals, rather delectably, how potent the power of suggestion can be in a world gone madly groupie.
75 Chicago Tribune
In Color Me Kubrick, John Malkovich has one of the roles of his life, and he acts it up like a haughty gourmet who's just picked up a succulent treat.
75 San Francisco Chronicle
The filmmakers have wisely turned it into a comedy, and a wickedly entertaining one at that.
70 Los Angeles Times Ed Gonzalez
Scarcely an insightful biographical portrait, Color Me Kubrick is still interesting, perhaps even intimidating, as a study of the way fandom can so readily be turned against itself.
70 The New York Times
Even if it doesn't add up to more than a fitfully amusing collection of comic sketches, Color Me Kubrick is a platform for John Malkovich to burst into lurid purple flame.
70 Chicago Reader
This 2005 British feature by writer Anthony Frewin and director Brian Cook, both former Kubrick assistants, uses Conway's unlikely saga to mount an appreciative send-up of a certain style of gay extravagance.
67 Austin Chronicle
A playground for Malkovich – enjoyable enough but not terribly deep.
67 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
It's entertaining if not exactly enlightening.
63 Boston Globe
Color Me Kubrick digs all sorts of devilish ironies out of this "true...ish story," and it's a fine dark farce before turning sad and, worse, monotonous. The con wears off before the movie does, but while it's in the air, "Kubrick" spins with bogus cheer.
63 TV Guide
Malkovich pulls out all the gaudy stops.
63 Premiere
Best appreciated as a rather amusing farce called The John Malkovich Show, the movie's every scene is anchored, then stolen, by the commanding thespian's Alan act.
50 New York Post
Great fun for the first 20 minutes - which include Kubrickian tracking shots and music from "2001" and "A Clockwork Orange" - but seems long at 86.
50 The Onion (A.V. Club)
The film makes funny use of music (particularly Lionel Richie's "Hello") and excellent use of Malkovich, but it literally only has one idea in its head, and when that idea runs dry, it's as lost as Conway is without his plethora of Kubrick masks.
50 Rolling Stone
If you can't watch John Malkovich being John Malkovich, it's still a kick watching him play Alan Conway, a gay Brit who pretended to be the legendary and reclusive director Stanley Kubrick during the 1990s.
30 Village Voice Nathan Lee
I find it hard to believe that Conway bamboozled half of London simply by announcing his name, and it's regrettable that the filmmakers premise their picture on such improbable gullibility. The real Conway was assuredly slier than his bio-pic incarnation; he ought to have been played by Sacha Baron Cohen.
30 New York Magazine
The movie is endless even at less than 90 minutes. You could use it, "A Clockwork Orange" style, as aversion therapy for seemingly incorrigible con artists.
30 Salon.com
Director Cook and screenwriter Anthony Frewin were both intimates of the real Kubrick, which I guess counts for something. But for what, exactly? Does it uniquely qualify them to make a mean-spirited, trashy and intermittently funny film about a guy who wasn't Kubrick?
30 The Hollywood Reporter
At best a kitschy "Catch Me If You Can" and at worst a tedious comedy that grows more tiresome by every self-consciously irreverent minute.

CLOSE THIS WINDOW

©2008 CNET Networks Inc. All rights reserved.