Metacritic Film

Exorcist: The Version You've Never Seen, The

Starring Ellen Burstyn, Max von Sydow, Lee J. Cobb, Kitty Winn, Jack MacGowran, Jason Miller, and Linda Blair

MPAA RATING: R for strong language and disturbing images

Warner Bros.
Horror
131 minutes | Color
USA
Released In Theaters September 22, 2000

In this re-release of the horror classic, a 12 year old girl (Blair) becomes possessed by a malevolent spirit, and her only hope is an exorcism. Two priests are summoned to exorcise the demon.

WRITTEN BY
William Peter Blatty (also novel)

DIRECTED BY
William Friedkin

Overall Metascore

This is a weighted, normalized average of all individual scores given by critics, on a scale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

82 / 100

Critic Reviews

100 Portland Oregonian
Isn't just a horror film, but an American classic. Watch again and reflect for days after -- at your own risk.
100 Charlotte Observer
Classically scary.
100 San Francisco Chronicle
Friedkin has said the new, expanded version of his film has a more spiritual tone. But it's still a shocker.
100 Chicago Tribune
Re-released now in a digitally enhanced, sonically improved and slightly longer version, the movie is even better than it was in 1973.
91 Entertainment Weekly
Here, in paranoid, bad acid trip form, is the real birth of girl power.
90 Film.com
The best thing about the new Exorcist is the spiffed-up soundtrack.
90 Variety
This edition of the seminal example of genre sensationalism refined by the cream of Hollywood craftsmanship is more complicated than a standard director's cut.
90 Dallas Observer
That's what directors do when they have nothing new to say: They go back and rewrite the past, if only to avoid facing the future
89 Mr. Showbiz
It's shlock, yes, but at least it's highbrow shlock.
88 USA Today
Retains the power to turn heads -- and stomachs.
88 Boston Globe
An upsetting landmark. Don't take the children.
88 Philadelphia Inquirer
Suffice it to say I prefer the original conclusion, and I think most Exorcist fans will agree
88 New York Post
His (Friedkin) very lack of subtlety is both the strength and weakness of The Exorcist in the 21st century.
88 San Francisco Examiner
The amazing thing about the film, for anyone who hasn't had an intentional Hollywood scare lately, is that it still delivers on the most visceral level
88 Chicago Sun-Times
Was and is a brilliant horror film, one with an archetypal ability to reach and disturb us. If I were showing The Exorcist to a friend, I would show the 1973 version without the slightest hesitation.
88 Miami Herald
The Exorcist has lost none of its ability to invade your nightmares.
80 Washington Post
A museum piece, something to be enjoyed for its historical value.
80 Rolling Stone
There's something elemental about The Exorcist, even with the new hopeful ending that betrays the bleak original.
80 Chicago Reader Don Druker
You're scared witless much of the time, even if you conclude afterward that this 1973 movie was really pretty amateurish and simpleminded.
75 New York Daily News
The movie that launched a new era in horror films, and which, for one generation, remains one of the scariest experiences of their lives.
70 TV Guide
This truly terrifying film version of the best-selling Blatty novel is far superior to the book.
70 TNT RoughCut
Still packs a wallop of terror for those with the strength of stomach for it.
50 Christian Science Monitor
This hugely popular horror yarn is less a cleverly spun story than a disjointed collection of shockeroos, surrounding a few ghoulishly effective moments with overcooked plot twists and in-your-face vulgarity.
40 Washington Post
11 minutes longer than the original, and 11 minutes worse.

CLOSE THIS WINDOW

©2009 CNET Networks Inc. All rights reserved.