| 90 |
Film Threat
Sophomoric silliness.
|
| 80 |
Washington Post
Hal Hinson
The movie is a piece of junk...However, it's also immensely likable and hysterically, irreverently funny.
|
| 70 |
Time
The humor is gross-out but inoffensive, since it's rooted in whimsy, not malice. Smith finesses the sophomore jinx with sophomoric high jinks. [6 Nov 1995]
|
| 70 |
Variety
Leonard Klady
While admittedly ragged and ribald, it's a picture with an innate charm and honesty that should win over audiences.
|
| 63 |
USA Today
The slapstick would put Curly and Moe to shame. The raunch is crude as often as it is clever.
|
| 63 |
ReelViews
There are several painfully awkward "dead spots" in Mallrats where nothing works -- not the dialogue, the acting, or the direction.
|
| 60 |
The New York Times
Mallrats mixes clever bits and an appealing quirkiness (which goes a long way) with gross-out practical jokes, needless repetition and obvious padding, since it has no real plot. [20 Oct 1995]
|
| 50 |
Washington Post
I'm guessing even die-hard "Clerks" fans will find this only-in-America stuff only partially satisfying, like something they gorged on at the Eatery, then wished they hadn't.
|
| 50 |
Austin Chronicle
Alison Macor
While Smith's testosterone-loaded humor is a taste I have yet to acquire, his choices of a comic book-inspired credit sequence, the guest appearance of Marvel Comics genius Stan Lee, and the film's overall superhero aesthetic perfectly capture the mall mise-en-scene.
|
| 50 |
San Francisco Chronicle
Strains through buckets of verbiage and muddled plot to seize only a few dopey laughs.
|
| 42 |
Entertainment Weekly
Staff (Not Credited)
A hopelessly stupid movie that should appeal to baked couch potatoes everywhere.
|
| 40 |
Chicago Reader
As an "Animal House" romp about consumer slackers in a New Jersey mall, it's harmless enough--just don't expect any sort of edge. Smith has left the working class to become just as boring as everybody else.
|
| 40 |
TV Guide
Staff (Not Credited)
Smith brazenly ignores plot conventions and concentrates on an apparently endless stream of crude and occasionally clever one-liners.
|
| 38 |
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
Talky, crude and sexist, Mallrats is significantly less funny, a flatulent sequel to the director's small start.
|
| 38 |
Chicago Sun-Times
"Clerks" spoke with the sure, clear voice of an original filmmaker. In Mallrats the voice is muffled, and we sense instead advice from the tired, the establishment, the timid and other familiar Hollywood executive types.
|
| 25 |
Chicago Tribune
Serves up horrendous lead acting, murky cinematography, bland atmosphere, unengaging romance, mug-crazy cameo performances, bash-on-the-head satire and ill-timed slapstick gags that look like outtakes from a Bozo the Clown show gone berserk. [20 Oct 1995]
|
| 25 |
San Francisco Examiner
A complete misfire.
|
| 10 |
Los Angeles Times
A numbing and dispiriting experience aimed at the least discriminating parts of the teen-age audience.
|
