Christian Science Monitor's Scores
- Movies
- TV
For 3,350 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
56% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
42% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 3.9 points higher than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 66
| Highest review score: |
Critic Score
100
|
|---|---|
| Lowest review score: |
Critic Score
0
|
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,987 out of 3350
-
Mixed: 1,043 out of 3350
-
Negative: 320 out of 3350
3,350
movie reviews
- By critic score
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The bad thing about A Guy Thing isn't the talent of its stars but the warmed-over triteness of the material they're forced to work with. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The problem with Possession isn't that it's filmed in a lackluster way, but that it shouldn't have been filmed at all. Byatt's novel is an adventure in language, telling its story through a kaleidoscopic array of Victorian-style poetry and prose, alongside gripping accounts of the characters' activities and escapades. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
What really hurts is the movie's shallow screenwriting, self-indulgent acting, and woozy camerawork. -
-
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The plot is predictable, the characters are cliches, and all the actors look and sound like refugees from a movie Martin Scorsese would have made vastly better three decades ago. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
Was this spiritless stuff really directed by Paul and Chris Weitz of "American Pie" fame? How the rebels have mellowed! -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
Fiction and fantasy to evade reflection on the world we actually live in. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
Een fans of Jay and Silent Bob may find the story too slender and the jokes too repetitive to be much fun. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The gimmick behind the screenplay is clever, but the filmmakers don't rise to the challenge they've set themselves, merely spinning two unimaginative stories for the price of one. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
Brody has offbeat charisma, but it's no match for the corny dialogue he's given here, not to mention the "Wild at Heart" snakeskin jacket he wears. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The film means well, but each scene gets clobbered by sappy screenwriting. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The movie is designed to show off Liotta's acting skills, but pointless mayhem and sheer nastiness crowd out any virtues it might have had. -
-
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
A total lack of chemistry between the stars -- neither of whom is particularly good at romantic comedy in the first place -- and you have a promising package that grows steadily less lovable as it goes along. Down with this movie! -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
Norton's high-energy acting is the only element that saves the picture from being a total loss. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The acting is uneven and most of the romancing seems so mismatched. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
How did a dignified pro like Duvall get stuck in this fender-bender? -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
Travolta and Jackson have some effective scenes, but Nielsen is lacking in charisma, and James Vanderbilt's screenplay ought to be court-martialed. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The slasher-movie genre may never die, but can't its perpetrators think up variations more clever than this by-the-numbers rehash? -
-
-
-
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
By the time it ended, I'd stopped caring. I suspect most moviegoers will do the same. Here's hoping Shelton scurries back to the athletic world in a hurry. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The plot pants so hard -- that it makes less sense than the average pet-food commercial. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The movie's one good performance is given by the house, full of ominous inscriptions, inscrutable chambers, and fiendish machines. The human characters are played with various degrees of manic overacting. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
The film is a disappointment, and at more than two hours' running time, a very long disappointment. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
It soon gets down to its real business: fights, face-offs, and showdowns mired in the shallowest sort of Hollywood machismo. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
Crash-lands as disastrously as the heroes and never quite recovers its wits. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
Perry and Hurley don't have much chemistry, and the story is so dumb you might want to sue it for stupidity. -
-
-
Reviewed by
David Sterritt 25
Moves at a lumbering pace, peppered with ungainly gags and dramatic moments with little emotional power. The ironic commentary on show-biz superficiality is sabotaged by Niccol's failure to make his own story seem real. -