Games Master UK's Scores

  • Games
For 2,695 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 64% higher than the average critic
  • 5% same as the average critic
  • 31% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 0.4 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Game review score: 72
Highest review score:
Critic Score 98
Lowest review score:
Critic Score 3
Score distribution:
2,695 game reviews
    • Metascore: 50
    • Critic Score 49
    Technically polished and full of character, but as a game it's horribly frustrating. [Christmas 2006, p.70]
    • Metascore: 38
    • Critic Score 49
    Proof that the best idea ever on paper translates into B-grade mush. A stinker. [Sept 2007, p.73]
    • Metascore: 54
    • Critic Score 49
    Really difficult and mean-spirited. Puff was magic; Spyro is a jerk. [Christmas 2007, p.84]
    • Metascore: tbd
    • Critic Score 49
    Not a nightmare, but you'll be wistfully wishing for more excitement. [Sept 2008, p.84]
    • Metascore: tbd
    • Critic Score 49
    In a crowded genre filled with great titles, this is so far off road that it's in a ditch. [Feb 2009, p.78]
    • Metascore: 49
    • Critic Score 49
    It isn't even a half decent fighter! [Apr 2009, p.77]
    • Metascore: 72
    • Critic Score 49
    The king of Neo Geo struggles to find its footing on XBLA. [Dec 2008, p.84]
    • Metascore: 39
    • Critic Score 49
    A repetitive load of rot. [Apr 2009, p.80]
    • Metascore: 50
    • Critic Score 49
    Go and see the movie instead - it's cheaper, it stars Ricky Gervais and they serve popcorn. [July 2009, p.82]
    • Metascore: 54
    • Critic Score 49
    Go and see the movie instead - it's cheaper, it stars Ricky Gervais and they serve popcorn. [July 2009, p.82]
    • Metascore: 67
    • Critic Score 49
    Even if the Elder Scrolls cold turkey is hurting bad, buying this would still be a daft decision. [Mar 2011, p.92]
    • Metascore: 68
    • Critic Score 49
    It's incapable of holding your attention for long enough to warrant a high review score. [Feb 2011, p.91]
    • Metascore: 54
    • Critic Score 49
    It's not awful just basic to the point of tedium. [Aug 2012, p.84]
    • Metascore: 55
    • Critic Score 49
    The simplicity of the web game is lost in this flabby, oversized spin-off. [Nov 2012, p.85]
    • Metascore: 57
    • Critic Score 49
    Stylish visuals can't save this from being a repetitive and uninspiring experience. [May 2013, p.81]
    • Metascore: 37
    • Critic Score 48
    Passes the time of day in multi-player but single player is slow and dull. [Christmas 2006, p.101]
    • Metascore: 56
    • Critic Score 48
    A 14-game collection that inspires only fleeting nostalgia. [Christmas 2006, p.101]
    • Metascore: 59
    • Critic Score 48
    A child safe damp squib of a game that has none of the edge of the cartoon. [Aug 2007, p.73]
    • Metascore: 37
    • Critic Score 48
    A joyless mess that would have looked dated five years ago. In 2007 there's no excuse. [Sept 2007, p.82]
    • Metascore: 56
    • Critic Score 48
    A minigame compilation that lacks any real charm, and simply isn't enough fun. [Jan 2007, p.69]
    • Metascore: 32
    • Critic Score 48
    A first stepping stone to RPGs but this will be too basic for most. [Oct 2007, p.85]
    • Metascore: 68
    • Critic Score 48
    Unfriendly and dull. If Advance Wars had an evil twin, it would probably look like this. [May 2009, p.71]
    • Metascore: 46
    • Critic Score 48
    A disappointingly basic skateboarding game with a controller that doesn't work well. [Christmas 2009, p.75]
    • Metascore: 56
    • Critic Score 48
    Uninspiring puzzles. [Aug 2010, p.104]
    • Metascore: 62
    • Critic Score 48
    Pretty, but oddly unsatisfying to play. [July 2011, p.87]
    • Metascore: 53
    • Critic Score 48
    A surprisingly empty game lacking structure or purpose. [Feb 2012, p.93]
    • Metascore: 54
    • Critic Score 48
    The only good thing here is the endless retro mode - a fleeting thrill only. [Feb 2012, p.101]
    • Metascore: 57
    • Critic Score 48
    Pitch-perfect nostalgia spoiled by borderline unplayable matches. [Apr 2012, p.92]
    • Metascore: 45
    • Critic Score 48
    If (only) the stylus recognition worked. [Oct 2012, p.89]
    • Metascore: 44
    • Critic Score 48
    Fiddly controls make this apparently futuristic accelerometer abuser a complete waste of space. [Feb 2013, p.87]
    • Metascore: 54
    • Critic Score 47
    And levels that bit wider than the DS screen? Irritating and just plain rubbish, a bit like this game. [June 2006, p.79]
    • Metascore: 41
    • Critic Score 47
    The handling is awful, with cars skidding all over the shop as it's easy to oversteer. [Feb 2007, p.84]
    • Metascore: 54
    • Critic Score 47
    Dull, dumb predictable and annoying to play. Sorry, Scooby. [Christmas 2006, p.101]
    • Metascore: 50
    • Critic Score 47
    In an attempt to be a game for all, it turned into a game for no one. [Jan 2008, p.78]
    • Metascore: 58
    • Critic Score 47
    A horrendous collection you'll never want to revisit. [Jan 2008, p.78]
    • Metascore: 39
    • Critic Score 47
    Fun for young gamers but no real substance as a "real" racing game. [Aug 2008, p.83]
    • Metascore: 71
    • Critic Score 47
    The levels are colorful but dull, and after a mere five minutes a lurking sense of deja vu descends. Dead poor. [July 2008, p.82]
    • Metascore: 25
    • Critic Score 47
    AMY
    Everything good about Amy is undone by laborious puzzles and miserable controls. [March 2012, p.95]
    • Metascore: 66
    • Critic Score 46
    Ploddingly dull retro RPG. Half the 30 hours is backtracking. [June 2006, p.80]
    • Metascore: 42
    • Critic Score 46
    It's not really much of a game, unless you really like watching cut-scenes and fighting. [Jan 2007, p.65]
    • Metascore: tbd
    • Critic Score 46
    It technically functions as a shooter. But it needed to be a lot better to fits its gimmick. [Apr 2008, p.75]
    • Metascore: 60
    • Critic Score 46
    Passable as a single-player game but completely falls apart in co-op. Avoid. [Christmas 2008, p.64]
    • Metascore: 38
    • Critic Score 46
    We accept there's a place for this sort of thing, but it fails on the standard of its minigames. [June 2010, p.78]
    • Metascore: 53
    • Critic Score 45
    For a game featuring a carefree monkey, this is linear and boring. [Oct 2006, p.84]
    • Metascore: 47
    • Critic Score 45
    A one-trick pony, and that trick's been done better elsewhere. Giddy up and get outa here. [Oct 2008, p.78]
    • Metascore: 44
    • Critic Score 45
    Dodgy monster beat-'em-up that doesn't get anything right. [Mar 2008, p.79]
    • Metascore: 50
    • Critic Score 45
    We love original ideas, but there's no point in crazy innovation if you don't nail the basics. [Sept 2008, p.80]
    • Metascore: 58
    • Critic Score 45
    The kind of thing you'd regret downloading to your mobile. But more expensive. [June 2008, p.71]
    • Metascore: 53
    • Critic Score 45
    Zack and Wiki remain the only pirates worth dealing with on Wii. [Oct 2008, p.84]
    • Metascore: 42
    • Critic Score 45
    Yeah, it's bad. [Aug 2010, p.104]
    • Metascore: 41
    • Critic Score 45
    Yeah, it's bad. [Aug 2010, p.104]
    • Metascore: 43
    • Critic Score 45
    As far as bears go, this is Pooh. [Sept 2010, p.103]
    • Metascore: 41
    • Critic Score 45
    Creaky. [Oct 2010, p.75]
    • Metascore: 50
    • Critic Score 45
    Undeniably inventive ideas are spoiled by a steep learning curve, poor signposting and duff controls. [Issue#232, p.89]
    • Metascore: 36
    • Critic Score 45
    Tedious in a way we can barely describe, and almost broken in places. Don't buy this. [Sept 2006, p.76]
    • Metascore: 50
    • Critic Score 45
    Yoostar doesn't so much put you in the movies as put you next to a mangled clip of the movies. [June 2011, p.89]
    • Metascore: 45
    • Critic Score 45
    Limited promise is buried under an avalanche of technical failings in this derivative FPS. [Oct 2011, p.86]
    • Metascore: 68
    • Critic Score 45
    It's still just a bit too steep at 4.50 quid. [Christmas 2011, p.89]
    • Metascore: 59
    • Critic Score 45
    Less is more, even when girl-punching is involved. [Feb 2012, p.95]
    • Metascore: 58
    • Critic Score 45
    Nothing more than Bland Bland Racing. [Sept 2012, p.101]
    • Metascore: 43
    • Critic Score 45
    Spirited, but deeply flawed. [Feb 2013, p.89]
    • Metascore: 43
    • Critic Score 45
    Spirited, but deeply flawed. [Feb 2013, p.89]
    • Metascore: 73
    • Critic Score 45
    It's a wonderful game, but the mod-friendly PC is original is the one to plump for. [March 2013, p.87]
    • Metascore: 53
    • Critic Score 44
    Co-op trash aimed at under-10s. Give us Mickey and Donald anyday. [June 2006, p.80]
    • Metascore: 41
    • Critic Score 44
    A tepid bundle of mini-games that fails to raise a laugh or even the pulse. [Dec 2006, p.100]
    • Metascore: 56
    • Critic Score 44
    Fans might enjoy the sing-a-long. But the game part of this is seriously lacking. [Feb 2008, p.68]
    • Metascore: 52
    • Critic Score 44
    The forgotten chapter that should have stayed unwritten. [May 2012, p.84]
    • Metascore: 37
    • Critic Score 43
    A terrible "Mario Party" clone that offers nothing for gamers over five. [Nov 2007, p.85]
    • Metascore: 47
    • Critic Score 43
    A perfectly fine control scheme wrapped in the most hideous of gaming packages. [July 2007, p.82]
    • Metascore: 40
    • Critic Score 43
    Without the fitting visuals, this would be unbearable. [May 2008, p.84]
    • Metascore: 72
    • Critic Score 43
    Rather boring. [July 2010, p.93]
    • Metascore: 64
    • Critic Score 43
    Overly cutesy. [May 2011, p.89]
    • Metascore: 53
    • Critic Score 43
    It should have been uDraw's killer app, but Pictionary is just too obtuse to work effectively. [Feb 2012, p.92]
    • Metascore: 57
    • Critic Score 43
    Neat arty ideas but terrible controls and a lazy narrative undermine the gameplay. [Aug 2012, p.79]
    • Metascore: 45
    • Critic Score 42
    Stamps on our fondness for the original until all of the squishy bits ooze out of the sides. [Christmas 2008, p.73]
    • Metascore: 30
    • Critic Score 42
    More an advert for the cartoon than a game. [July 2007, p.84]
    • Metascore: 58
    • Critic Score 42
    The lackluster level designs and jerky controls make you feel empty. [Jan 2008, p.76]
    • Metascore: 45
    • Critic Score 42
    Love Ben 10? Buy anything with his face on? Well then you don't need our opinion do you? [Mar 2009, p.79]
    • Metascore: 41
    • Critic Score 42
    About as much fun as a Transformer that converts into a lump of coal. Give it a miss. [Sept 2010, p.99]
    • Metascore: 62
    • Critic Score 42
    Turgid stuff. [Oct 2010, p.77]
    • Metascore: 32
    • Critic Score 42
    Incompetent. [Jan 2011]
    • Metascore: 59
    • Critic Score 42
    This just can't compete. [Feb 2011, p.91]
    • Metascore: 57
    • Critic Score 41
    A meagre, mostly unjustifiable package whose ambitions plough the soils. [June 2006, p.70]
    • Metascore: 56
    • Critic Score 41
    When it does work it's dull and when it tries something new it fails miserably. [June 2007, p.69]
    • Metascore: 38
    • Critic Score 41
    A magical menagerie of neat ideas, ruined by horrid execution. [Feb 2011, p.81]
    • Metascore: 37
    • Critic Score 41
    A seed of a good idea prematurely chocked by numerous technical and design shortcomings. [Feb 2012, p.96]
    • Metascore: 45
    • Critic Score 41
    One of the weakest, most boring Bond games of all time. The brand deserves much better. [Christmas 2012, p.83]
    • Metascore: 60
    • Critic Score 40
    The same Disney games you've played 300 times before. [May 2006, p.80]
    • Metascore: 53
    • Critic Score 40
    If this was a fiver we might - might - consider it worthwhile. Until then, avoid. [July 2007, p.71]
    • Metascore: 53
    • Critic Score 40
    It should come packaged with "Diamond/Pearl" for an extra 5 quid. It doesn't. Avoid. [Jan 2007, p.70]
    • Metascore: 53
    • Critic Score 40
    Derivative of "Spider-Man 2" and with double the problems. [July 2007, p.74]
    • Metascore: 46
    • Critic Score 40
    Quite simply the worst game to bear the Nintendo logo in a generation or two. [Feb 2008, p.78]
    • Metascore: 69
    • Critic Score 40
    Shoot, swerve, shoot, swerve. In space, no one can hear you snore. [Oct 2008, p.84]
    • Metascore: 54
    • Critic Score 40
    Gamers have outgrown games so utterly basic and brainless. [May 2009, p.80]
    • Metascore: 57
    • Critic Score 40
    Too much talk and truly rotten combat. Seriously Liquid, are you taking the myth? [Mar 2009, p.80]
    • Metascore: 35
    • Critic Score 40
    Frustrating and joyless. [Apr 2009, p.74]
    • Metascore: 37
    • Critic Score 40
    Needs a control pad option or a gameplay rethink. At the moment it just doesn't work. [May 2009, p.74]
    • Metascore: 32
    • Critic Score 40
    Its difficulty curve is all over the place. [June 2009, p.81]
    • Metascore: 65
    • Critic Score 40
    Can we have it this simple, but a bit bigger? [Dec 2009, p.87]
    • Metascore: 68
    • Critic Score 40
    Guiding its tendrils is a vague science. [Sept 2010, p.99]