- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75Yes, "1 vs 100" is fun, but in reality, it's just a new take on an old, old game.
-
75I found 1 vs. 100 much more enjoyable [than Deal Or No Deal]. [23 Oct 2006, p.37]
-
60It’s by no means must-see TV, but this is one game show you don’t have to be ashamed of getting sucked in to.
-
60There's no shame in enjoying the entertainment provided by these game shows, which are a step above some of their TV competition, but if knowing all the answers in 1 vs 100 makes you feel smart, then you must be pretty stupid.
-
60If NBC must use game shows as spackle to fill holes in its schedule, it could do worse. It already has.
-
50"1 vs. 100" isn't really bad. Its only serious trouble is the pacing. In an hourlong episode, I count just 14 questions.
-
50Prime-time game shows like “1 vs 100,” which begins tonight on NBC, are not a test of a contestant’s erudition or nerve; they are aspirational reality shows that allow ordinary Joes to go for it all in the hope of transforming their lives.
-
50This is not a terrible game.
-
40[It] basically plays like "Deal," inasmuch as the questions are so simple that amassing thousands isn't much harder than guessing which case to open.
-
40There is a lot that is ridiculous here.
-
30The only problem with 1 vs. 100 is its determined idiocy.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 15 out of 21
-
Mixed: 3 out of 21
-
Negative: 3 out of 21
-
HenryY7
-
lukeg10The game identity is a fabulous game and show.It allows people to be entertained and surprised.
-
KyleF2Questions so easy even a monkey could answer them don't deserve a reward. Nor does this show deserve to stay on the air.