• Network: ABC
  • Series Premiere Date: Sep 27, 2007
  • Season #: 1 , 2
Metascore
33 out of 100

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 22 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 22
  2. Negative: 13 out of 22
  1. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    50
    Jon Harmon Feldman’s naughty script doesn’t develop much chemistry among the guys.
  2. A light-hearted, comedic drama about four wealthy guys with women troubles and work problems.
  3. 10
    Big Shots is an extremely unflattering showcase for these actors, particularly McDermott, whose overacting as the show’s bad boy puts the mug in smug.
  4. 37
    The problem with Big Shots is that the men don't sound like anyone at all, male or female.
  5. 50
    Terrific cast, some fun, but overall the writing is often as dead as Walter.
  6. The worst offense is that it seems to have been pitched as the male version of you-know-what without any real interest in speaking to the notion of what it means to be a man or, if you'd like, what men think, feel and say.
  7. Big Shots, an obnoxious waste of time that's likely the season's worst new show.
  8. I'd prefer you'd forget that one, and in coming years, I'll bet stars Dylan McDermott, Christopher Titus and Michael Vartan will hope to forget it, too. It's not worth your time or theirs.
  9. 80
    Big Shots matches affecting characters with genuinely funny stories and dialogue.
  10. Feldman has created a quartet of rich guys so insufferable, self-centered and whiny that they make the men of feminist masterwork "The Golden Notebook," or even "The Nanny Diaries," look positively heroic.
  11. There's nothing funny about tonight's Big Shots.
  12. 40
    Big Shots tries way too hard to be shocking and raunchy. The actors resemble kiddies at school trying to impress one another with the latest naughty word learned in gym class.
  13. When all is said and done, the series feels less like Wisteria Lane than "Stand By Me" channeled through Danielle Steel.
  14. Reviewed by: Diane Werts
    0
    No matter where the goofy "Desperate Housewives" goes, it's not into the toilet, which is where Big Shots spends its time both literally and figuratively.
  15. 50
    Big Shots isn't brilliant. And despite that attractive, well-matched male ensemble, the so-so series premiere lacks sufficient creative zing.
  16. 38
    It suffers from too much gloom and glam.
  17. We're all for handsome guys exploring their feminine side, but we want posters of them holding babies, not being them.
  18. Shots has some potential. The leads - Michael Vartan ("Alias"), Dylan McDermott ("The Practice"), Joshua Malina ("The West Wing"), Christopher Titus ("Titus")--have chemistry, and there are some funny lines and situations.
  19. One of television’s rare examples of successful farce.
  20. Reviewed by: Randy Cordova
    40
    The hunk quotient is pretty high. But that doesn't overcome the fact that the show is dumb and uninvolving.
User Score

Universal acclaim- based on 90 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 45 out of 52
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 52
  3. Negative: 7 out of 52
  1. TorrenceM.
    10
    I look forward to watching this show every week. It makes me laugh. It is time we see male bonding on tv. I was dissapointed when it was off the air. It is enjoyable. Full Review »
  2. LindaK.
    10
    You get a good show and then u take it away.
  3. TerriD
    9
    LOVE IT, laugh out loud every time. How can this be canceled? Maybe I miss the ridiculousness of "you know what and the city" but it is funny to see the true colors of the other species and what they try to get away with, at the same time a sliver of their "obstacle" of meaningful relationships. Full Review »