• Network:
  • Series Premiere Date: Apr 7, 2009
  • Season #: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4
Deadliest Warrior Image
  1. First Review
  2. Second Review
  3. Third Review
  4. Fourth Review

No score yet - based on 0 Critics Awaiting 4 more reviews What's this?

User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 12 Ratings

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • Summary: The greatest warriors of all time face off against one another. History provides the information; scientific tests and expert testimonials provide the results. Hours of intensive research is done to answer one question; "Who is Deadliest?"
  • Genre(s): Documentary
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of
  2. Mixed: 0 out of
  3. Negative: 0 out of
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 5
  2. Negative: 1 out of 5
  1. Jul 18, 2011
    This review contains spoilers. most of the episodes are OK but how the hell does 1 man carry that much weapons some of it is kinda unrealistic like when a solami pirate and some other dude when he shoots a rocket launcher and the guy doesn't die Collapse
  2. Jan 22, 2012
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Deadliest Warrior is a great show, I guess it's a bit like History for boys. There are few bad things about this show, but one could be the fact that it isn't all exactly accurate. In the Ninja vs Spartan episode, the Ninja would have been able to get the Spartan while he was hiding in the tree, but instead he just jumped down to fight the Spartan one on one. And the way they test the weapons, is really depends on who is the wielder. But overall, this show is great and I highly enjoy watching it. Expand
  3. Jan 3, 2011
    A genuine treat for history savvy and/or combat fans of all likings. "Deadliest Warrior" is a "blast, pow, clang, clash, boom, pop" from the past, bringing plenty of blood and "kick-butt" knowledge for the next addition in the history meets science genre of modern television. Expand
  4. May 31, 2014
    Anyone who enjoys military history has probably thought about how many of the matchups in the show would turn out on an actual battlefield. However, this show is basically just using the opinions of the hosts and a computer program to simulate fights. Battles are not fought in a pitri dish, and this show pretty much proves that. Expand
  5. Jan 12, 2012
    As if someone gave this crap a ten and then went on to complain. This show is awful. It's full of pseudoscience and inconsistencies. They base who wins on 4 simulations of 1v1 weapon skirmishes. Sorry, but the weapon match ups are just awful. A shield versus a club? Black egg versus a weapon? Pirate against knight? Pathetic. Expand