• Network: NBC
  • Series Premiere Date: Sep 25, 2006
  • Season #: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4
User Score
6.8 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 101 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 69 out of 101
  2. Negative: 23 out of 101

Review this tv show

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. Path
    Sep 16, 2009
    3
    Ok enough with the drama! I want to see some fighting and action! Why do I even put myself through watching another boring episode. This show use to be soo exciting!
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  2. Oct 3, 2010
    8
    The 3rd series of Heroes was probably the 2nd best overall with the return of the twist and turns that had excited viewers during the 1st run. I'm not sure splitting the series up was a great idea but I think that critics and viewers alike were far to critical of it after its unfortunate writers guild incident. A shame,a real shame.
  3. Jessica
    Sep 30, 2008
    10
    I am loving this season so far! I don't see how anyone can "not" love this show.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. JRMMRJ
    Sep 10, 2009
    9
    I loved season 1, I HATED, HATED season 2, but I loved every minute of season 3. Haven't checked out season 4 unfortunately, but looking forward to checking it out on DVD. I just had a great time watching, that's all there is to it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. Cathy
    Apr 1, 2009
    2
    I'm very disappointed with the direction the show has taken this season. It has now completely departed from the feel and the style of the first season. In the first season, each action that happened lead somewhere. Each action was important. Each person was important. Now it feels like the writers have completely forgotten the backstory of each of these characters -- completely forgetting that yes, other things have happened. The characters have all turned 180 degrees several times just for shock value. Sylar is an excellent example. I'm sick of this "He's good!" "No, he's bad!", "No he's good", "No, really, he's bad!" nonsense. Typically I do like the moral ambiguity presented when you have a good character doing something shady or a shady character doing something good, but the character is so 2-D, flipping his loyalties around so quickly is ineffective at best and terrible writing at worst. One could say the same thing for the rest of the crew -- HRG, Mohinder, Peter, Nathan, Tracy, Mama Petrelli. Terrible writing this season. I'm very disappointed. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. Nick
    Sep 10, 2009
    7
    I thought the first half of the third season (Villains) was the worst this show has ever offered, but that the second half (Fugitives) was one of the best. Watch the second half.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. NathanA.
    Oct 15, 2008
    2
    There were a few intriguing elements but otherwise the season premier was a disparate mess. They have no regard for the characters they set up and too little patience to start them over. Instead, they just change characters (Suresh, for instance) on a whim by tactlessly and explicitly stating their emotions to suit whatever outlandish plot they've come up with next. When this show started out, I had such high hopes for it, but after that episode I'm completely disinterested. It's amazing how quickly they squandered the the goodwill and hope they'd earned from viewers and critics alike. Figure out where you're going more than a season in advance, then go there. And take your time letting that story develop, jeeze! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. TageE.
    Oct 25, 2008
    2
    The third season is a textbook definition of "Jumping the shark". Either the writers don't care or they're just negligent. Way too much is happening way too quickly and things are changing way to drastically for the show to be meaningful or interesting anymore.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. MarkM.
    Oct 7, 2008
    8
    The anticipation for the third installment has been high. Except it has been so long since the season two finale it's challenging to remember everything that is going on. So far, I personally believe that Season 3 has lived up to Heroes hype. The primary focus being the Villians gives a different change of secenery and let's Kring dive deeper into his dark creative mind.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. BradW.
    Sep 22, 2008
    6
    There are SO many characters running around (all of them up to something that's generally mysterious) that the show is becoming really convoluted. Cut the cast in half, throw in a bit of humor, and the show will be back on track.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. Renarudo-
    Mar 5, 2009
    1
    What once was a fun and interesting show has turned into a weekly hot mess, the characters are just one dimensional cardboard figures that turn each episode into an eye-rolling feast for the viewer. The plots just keep going from predicable to dumb and then dumber each week. The show has gotten so bad that they have started with budget cuts, you never see Petrelli taking off to fly anymore, he just jumps and then they cut to another shot and you hear a sound of him taking off. Cheesyyyyyy. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. Allan
    Jun 1, 2009
    3
    I can probably say that the third season of Heroes is one of the worst seasons I have ever watched, of any television show. And it's 25 episodes! My god. There are about 5 or 6 episodes that are great, and the rest range from below average to terrible. Watch the first season, and you will love it. Watch the second season, and you will be entertained, if put off by the rehashed storylines and rushed ending. Watch the third season and you will wonder how one of the most exciting new shows on television has become simply terrible and derivative. Also, the last fifteen minutes of the season finale contains more stupidity, ridiculousness and just plain terrible writing that you will actually feel offended. And my god, the teaser to volume four is horrendous. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. ElginW.
    Nov 12, 2008
    10
    I'm glad to see Heroes return to it's original form after last seasons horrible display.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. BillB.
    Nov 18, 2008
    9
    Frankly I'm amazed and quite shocked that people can give a series a score after a single episode. I at least watched a half dozen before giving it a low 9.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. JordanK.
    Nov 3, 2008
    10
    Great start to the season. One may see that this season is heading in a great direction. Great so far, the premier may have been awkward and confusing, but it was only created to have people try to fill in the blanks themselves, brainstorm a little bit. Heroes took the once predictable but crazy climaxes into a mysterious darkness that needs to be resolved through a series of unfortunate events.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. Fantasy
    Nov 9, 2008
    1
    What was once such a promising show has jumped the shark. I'm down to Tivoing it now but there are so many different stories going on it's hard to follow. When you stop caring about the characters in which the show has been reduced to a WWF event as in good one moment, bad the next, then back to good, who really cares? Have the writers ever heard of less is more? This will be the swan song as the show is doomed. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. DanTheMan
    Oct 22, 2008
    9
    I am loving season three so far. I'm a superhero uber-geek and this is what I look for in a show about "heroes". After suffering through the abomination that was season 2, season 3 is a breath of fresh air. We got rid of superfluous characters, (although I thought Adam got a raw deal), and the action has been ramped up big-time. Last season I dreaded each new episode but this time around Mondays can't come fast enough. I know there are a few annoying things as well, (too many Petrellis, some rather bizarre behaviour and bad dialogue for characters such as Claire and Peter), but I rally love the pace of season 3. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. ThomasW.
    Oct 24, 2008
    10
    Season one = amazing season two = not so great, but could of been worse (stupid writer strike) Season three = back to what this show is about, amazing story, with plots and twist around every corner, when you think you got something figured out, they shove it in your face and say wrong! great!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. OM
    Sep 22, 2008
    2
    What a let down! Seems like the "lost" dilemma has ultimately reached this show. Something good gets diluted with hypothetical problems to somehow throw a twist in an already unanswerable question in order to stretch a show for a network. To make more seasons and more money. Seems like they are trying to do too much without staying true to the core of the first season. The Third Season is similar to this comment, a whole lot of words and fluff but doesn't make a lot of sense! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. Parker
    Sep 23, 2008
    9
    After reading some of the reviews for the first two shows of season three... I'm genuinely surprised and disappointed... Not at the show, but how anally retentive, and bitchy an audience can be... Heroes can clearly not win with you people... I'm pretty sure most of you despise and envy the size of the show and its popularity so you actively look for the smallest reasons to annoy yourself with... with that said i find the majority of reviews for these two shows completely unfounded... Season two was heavily criticised for its lack of fireworks and grandieur, i admit thats with good reason, i somewhat felt the same... Roll on season 3 and you are handed all the fireworks and plot twits you will ever need, and you're all still whining like spoilt brats... You cant be pleased, you cant be entertained, you just WANT to disike this show... shame on all of you fake intellectuals who think you're a better writer than anyone else. Just enjoy the damn show already, or turn off, and shut up. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. JorgeL.
    Sep 23, 2008
    2
    I really don't see much of an improvement over last season so far, in fact it looks like it could potentially be worse. The premiere was cheesy, awkward and a little embarrassing to watch or even admit to it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. WillM.
    Sep 23, 2008
    9
    I was really happy with the premiere. This season is starting off at a must faster clip than last, and I thought that the story arcs being set up seem very intriguing. That said, while I like the "future Peter" character, the proposition of another season of "present Peter" being trapped somewhere seemed tired. They did that last season. My test for a television show like this is how much fun I'm having while I watch it. On that metric, "Heroes: Villains" was a huge success. I'm looking forward to next week. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. Caspery
    Sep 23, 2008
    2
    Spare me the stupidity and the ensuing fanboy blindness that causes them to act like this show (and LOST) could do no harm. They're both masking inept writing with a false aura of intelligence. If people think either of these shows is a work of genius, rather written above a 4th grave level, what will they accept to be merely good?
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. DavidH
    Sep 24, 2008
    4
    I was a fan from the start in earlier seasons, so I had high hopes for this premiere. Unfortunately, I was disappointed to find the plot moving in a very negative and somewhat depressing direction. Perhaps I'm a bit old-fashioned, but I prefer the good guys to out-weigh the bad guys by some measurable amount. This premiere didn't even seem to suggest a light at the end of the tunnel...
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. Jake
    Sep 24, 2008
    10
    Back and better than ever!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. AnthonyM.
    Sep 24, 2008
    9
    A return to form after the dreary second season. This is more like it!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. JoeyM.
    Sep 24, 2008
    8
    "Heroes" is back at a furious pace this season. Gone (so far) are many of the things that made last season so tedious - though they kept Maya. On the positive side, the first two episodes of this season are action packed and full of plot points that resolve quickly and with some decent payoff. Not quite as exciting as Season 1, but infinitely better than Season 2. I shall be watching!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. BillM
    Sep 26, 2008
    4
    Really disappointing. Full of ridiculous twists and terrible writing. Seems like this crew has already told their one good story.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. FredT.
    Sep 22, 2008
    1
    Still an incoherent mess. Watch The Sarah Connor Chronicles to see how it should be done.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. [Anonymous]
    Sep 24, 2008
    10
    Brilliance in a jar of fun.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. Chris
    Sep 24, 2008
    9
    Its everything I have hoped for, more action, more answers, more questions, more powers, more awesome.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. Navi
    Sep 26, 2008
    7
    Pretty decent season premiere. The only thing that bothered me was how it was turning into Bioshock. Suresh literally injected himself with powers, just like what the main character did in Bioshock. The time travelling storyline also reminded me a lot about Star Trek Enterprise Season 3.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. DoctorO.
    Sep 27, 2008
    7
    1st episode seemed like it tried to tackle too many threads within 2 hours. We'll see what happens over the season... Maybe it was just enough to tease.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. ShayS
    Sep 18, 2009
    7
    Suspense, Drama, Special Effects all these in 1 word - HEROES.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. Nov 26, 2010
    7
    Still not living up to it's 1st season expectation but still worth watching. Some of the characters really haven't grown such as Mr Bennett who has actually shrunk down to his only motivation and reason for living is his daughter Clare. The actor is doing the best he can with a 2 dimensional script. However, the character Peter Petrelli has been more enriched this season, as has the brother Nathan Petrelli. Expand
  36. Mar 4, 2012
    6
    Pretty decent run. Volume Three "Villains" is considerably much better than Volume Four "Fugitives". All the characters' identities seem to have completely changed or taken a turn into the unknown in both volumes 3 and 4. There doesn't seem to be much interesting interaction between the characters. It's very much focused on "stopping the bad guy" rather than what made the first series good, which is an exploration of different characters' motives. Overall I'd certainly advise watching "Villains" but the Fugitives volume seems more like a brainstorm of ideas. You have all these chapters but none of them really connect to the end result. It's all a bit jumbled. Expand
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 9 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 9
  2. Negative: 1 out of 9
  1. 50
    NBC sent the first hour of tonight's two-hour season premiere to critics, and it's sprinkled with some of the original fun: inventive special effects, a twist or two, some nifty gore. That doesn't stop it from being the same, familiar mess.
  2. Reviewed by: Misha Davenport
    75
    Based on the first action-packed and fun episode, it looks like Kring and crew have succeeded in pulling out of their sophomore slump.
  3. Even just a half hour in, it's difficult not to wish everyone would just lighten the heck up. The graphic novel noir feel is becoming increasingly oppressive, and everyone is just so grim.