• Network: ABC
  • Series Premiere Date: Dec 18, 2005
  • Season #: 1
Once Upon a Mattress Image
  • Summary: Tony-winner Kathleen Marshall makes her TV directorial debut with this musical based on the fairy tale, "The Princess and the Pea," which has been both a Broadway production in the late 1950s as well as a TV movie (twice previously).
  • Genre(s): Movie/Mini-Series
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 15
  2. Negative: 4 out of 15
  1. Reviewed by: J. Wynn Rousuck
    90
    Surely one of the most delightful examples of televised family entertainment this holiday season.
  2. While the performances are first-rate, and the film is never less than enjoyable, it doesn't quite take off.
  3. It's worth the effort, at least for a little while, to watch Burnett, at 72, fume and foam in her fantastic Bob Mackie costumes. But Ullman has almost no panache in the princess role, and Smothers, silenced by a curse for 99 percent of the program, doesn't rise above a cute cartoon.

See all 15 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 16
  2. Negative: 9 out of 16
  1. MaryS
    10
    FANTASTIC! It was great to see it redone, especially with Carol Burnett as the Queen. The entire production was a joy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. JACKG
    4
    A delightful show has been Disney-ized, removing all irony, shtick and half the score. Well at least it's better that the awful Sara Jessica Parker revival that reviled Broadway a few seasons back. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. BobW
    3
    Once again, Disney thinks it knows best... and as usual, it doesn't! "Mattress" is a classic. It is a fast paced, almost insane romp through a children's fairy tale, the way it REALLY happened [aka: The adult version] Yet, it can work quite well for children too, but not this version. The casting was great: Ullman made Winnifred her own, as did Burnett as the queen, each wisely chosing their own route rather than try to out do the original actress. Tommy Smothers was great and his little yo-yo- bit worked, but if I was casting, I'd have gone with one of the two best living mimes today: Marcel Marceau or the brilliant Bill Irwin. The score still stands up, and the musical department did a terrific job of "updating" the sound. So why such a low rating? THE BOOK! Why re-write what was already successful on Broadway? The original book was fast paced, corny, and magnificent. Here the writer heavy-handedly spell out everything twice over, add "depth" that isn't needed, and so slow down the pace, it's a torture. Why cut "Opening For A Princess" which tell the whole setup in 3 fun minutes, and replace it with dull dialog that takes twice as long? Why change Harry from a simple "Sir" to some "totally honest" L'il Abner wannabe? Why add a whole "dungeon scene" which adds nothing, and forces you to cut "Very Soft Shoes" to save time? I wish they'd re-release either or both TV "originals" [I have the '64 monochrome release, which takes the same amount of time, yet is far more enjoyable!] The NY Times critic said she thought this remake was great, and she thought it would be hard to get kids to watch the "original." Well, I doubt she's even SEEN the original. If she had, she'd have never made such a statement. I watched this remake with friends and panned it. They couldn't understand why, then I popped in my old tape. They all went "Oh! ...yes!" Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes

See all 16 User Reviews

Recommended Products

    • Start date: Oct 23, 2011
    Once Upon a Time Image
    • Start date: Oct 5, 2011
    American Horror Story Image