- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
70Has the potential to be a real guilty pleasure.
-
70"Sex" proves to be a series with loads of appeal for viewers still mourning the cancellation of "Melrose Place."
-
63It's skank-errific, if flawed.
-
60You don't have to be under 30 to enjoy this. It's no more, or less, ridiculous than ABC's massively-hyped hit about sex, love and secrets among housewives and other oldsters.
-
60We haven't had a good dishy time-waster in awhile. Maybe this is it.
-
58It's best to ignore the attempts at deep thought, enjoy the pretty cast, and guzzle it like diet pop. [30 Sep 2005, p.87]
-
50Nobody is quite what they seem in this show, and watching the layers of deception and falsity peel away is its main attraction. Of course, at some point, there better turn out to be something underneath.
-
40Check your brain at the door and you'll find a potential guilty pleasure lurking within.
-
40Not as terrible as most shows of this genre.
-
38Incessantly chatty, incredibly busy and annoyingly pretentious.
-
30[A] vapid soap.
-
30If the writers and actors were willing to get a little campy, if they lifted the group's obnoxiousness factor over the top, the show might have some entertainment value. But as it stands, it's an hour spent watching dull, pretty people work very hard to be hipper than one another, as well as hipper than you.
-
20Sadly, this show makes a mess of its neighborhood-centric premise.
-
10We don't expect nighttime relationship dramas to be thrilling, but we have the right to expect an interesting character or two.
-
10[A] stupid, stupid nighttime soap.
-
0It's awful.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 13 out of 15
-
Mixed: 0 out of 15
-
Negative: 2 out of 15
-
KathyB.5I loved it!
-
KyleighH0
-
breem10I loved this show! Didn't say it was cancelled, just on "break". I need it back!