CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Television

2008 Summer Season
2007-08 Midseason
2007 Fall Season
2007 Summer Season
2006-07 Midseason
2006 Fall Season
2006 Summer Season
2005-06 Midseason
2005 Fall Season
Best Of 2007
Best Of 2006
Best Of 2005
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss TV In Our Forums

 

Upcoming & Recent Movies & Specials

Camp Rock 65
Disney, 6/20

 

Upcoming & Recent Series Premieres

The Secret Life of the American Teenager 45
ABC Family, Tuesday

Hopkins 78
ABC, Thursday

Inspector Lewis: Series One 74
PBS, Sunday

The Middleman 73
ABC Family, Monday

Secret Diary of a Call Girl 53
Showtime, Monday

Weeds Season Four 67
Showtime, Monday

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Bones
SERIES: Fox, Tuesday 8:00p (60 minutes)

Bones
Critic Score
Metascore: 55 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.9 out of 10
based on 29 reviews
read critic reviews
how did we calculate this?
based on 147 votes
read user comments
rate this tv show

Starring Emily Deschanel, and David Boreanaz

Fox's first police procedural is inspired by real-life forensic anthropologist and novelist Kathy Reichs. Its female lead (Deschanel) solves crimes by investigating skeletal remains, aided (or hindered) by her FBI partner (Boreanaz).

GENRE(S): Crime, Drama
CREATED BY: Hart Hanson
FIRST AIR DATE: September 13, 2005

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

88
Chicago Sun-Times Doug Elfman
Boreanaz and Deschanel stir good chemistry as a crime-fighting duo.
Read Full Review
88
USA Today Robert Bianco
Bones isn't the riskiest or most ambitious series coming your way this season. But it may turn out to be one of the most satisfying and entertaining.
Read Full Review
80
TV Guide Matt Roush
You might think you can't possibly fit one more crime-solving procedural onto an overcrowded calendar, but consider giving Bones a break.
80
Miami Herald Glenn Garvin
The show's witty, inventive writing would be fun even in the hands of a less capable cast.
Read Full Review
75
People Weekly Tom Gliatto
Emily Deschanel is well cast as Brennan--she has the right sort of drained, remote presence, as if still working off last night's sleeping pill--and she's also well cast against David Boreanaz. [19 Sep 2005, p.45]
75
Detroit Free Press Mike Duffy
Besides the nifty, repressed romantic dynamic between Brennan and Booth, "Bones" has some fun with snazzy hologram visualizations of the murder victims in each case.
Read Full Review
75
Houston Chronicle Mike McDaniel
Like CSI and its offshoots, Bones will take viewers to dark and sometimes disgusting places. So, in one sense, Fox may have come up with a format that will reach both men, who love unappetizing scenes, and women, because of the female heroine.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Tim Goodman
Deschanel, who's believable either serious or perplexed -- and adorable in her quirkiness -- immediately becomes this series' most important ingredient.
Read Full Review
70
New York Magazine John Leonard
As science and as detection, Bones has a way to go before it’s more than a bug in Grissom’s Vegas eye. But the screwball romance is promising.
Read Full Review
70
Boston Globe Matthew Gilbert
An engaging crime show that borrows plenty from the ''CSI" franchise but adds a layer of light character drama.
Read Full Review
70
Hollywood Reporter Ray Richmond
While "Bones" has too much "X-Files" and "CSI" going in the pilot to feel completely original, it's nonetheless a taut, well-constructed, character-rich procedural with genuine potential.
Read Full Review
67
Entertainment Weekly Gillian Flynn
If Bones holds up, it'll be because that old Sam-and-Diane, Maddie-and-David, Mulder-and-Scully opposites-attract stuff never feels standard when it's done right.
Read Full Review
63
New York Post Adam Buckman
In tonight's premiere of "Bones," for example, super-sleuth Temperance concludes from the young victim's bones that she was probably a tennis player -- a nifty conclusion, but one that has no bearing on the case. It's a factoid that leads nowhere, which is kind of where "Bones" goes in its premiere episode.
Read Full Review
60
Orlando Sentinel Hal Boedeker
Deschanel exudes a luminous quality that elevates this grim, conventional show.
Read Full Review
60
Cleveland Plain Dealer Mark Dawidziak
There's a fine line between clever and labored, and "Bones" sometimes strays over that line with one-liners about skull fragments, blood samples, X-rays and microbes. That's where "see how cleverly we can banter" writing creeps into the otherwise crisp proceedings.
Read Full Review
60
Los Angeles Times Paul Brownfield
Rather too slick for its own good.
Read Full Review
50
New York Daily News David Hinckley
The quality of the mystery in the pilot, no better than mediocre, is what keeps this series from starting off with a wider lead at the opening gun.
Read Full Review
50
Philadelphia Inquirer Jonathan Storm
It could use a little more dramatic meat on its predictable framework.
Read Full Review
50
The New York Times Alessandra Stanley
Clings to proven formulas.
Read Full Review
50
The Onion A.V. Club
Boreanaz and Deschanel have nice chemistry... but the script also tends to undermine its brighter moments with dialogue that repeats the exposition and the characters' defining traits over and over again.
Read Full Review
40
Variety Brian Lowry
Deschanel comes off a little too much like a sorority girl rather than a scientist with missing-parent issues.
Read Full Review
40
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Melanie McFarland
"Bones" probably will remind more viewers of a cross between "CSI" and "The X-Files," except with more humorous banter than the first, and more romantic heat than the latter.
Read Full Review
40
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Rob Owen
It's an (occasionally) frothy mix -- comedic moments tumble into serious scenes of forensic examination -- that's not altogether terrible, but neither does it beg to be watched on a regular basis.
Read Full Review
40
Chicago Tribune Sid Smith
The scientific setup may be intriguing... But the dialogue, including the contrived sexual tension between Temperance and Seeley, is strictly canned and cutesy.
Read Full Review
20
Kansas City Star Aaron Barnhart
A flimsy little procedural that uses logical and technological leaps of faith to hide its central problem: lack of co-star chemistry.
Read Full Review
20
PopMatters Roger Holland
Bones is a very poor cross between the X-Files and CSI with characters stolen from NCIS, plot devices from Veronica Mars, and topicality from Law & Order.
Read Full Review
20
Slate Dana Stevens
Memo to network execs planning an all-forensics programming slate for fall: Watching attractive people poke at skull fragments is not inherently interesting.
Read Full Review
20
Washington Post Tom Shales
The heroine, unlikely in every detail including her name, Temperance Brennan, goes about reassembling corpses and then divining how they got to be that way. It's precise, tedious work and so is watching this show.
Read Full Review
10
Newsday Verne Gay
It's as if we've all passed this way (many times) before and could write the dialogue, act the scenes, predict the outcome all in our sleep.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this tv show is 6.9 (out of 10) based on 147 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

G S. gave it a9:
A recent convert, wish I watched from the beginning!

Wanda K gave it a9:
Great chemistry between the lead actors, snappy dialogue, does not take itself too seriously. The supporting cast is very interesting as well. I really enjoy it.

David S. gave it a10:
It's quite apparent to those who have watched an entire season of this show, which critics are being paid to write - and which are paid to think. This is a great show. Its attention to detail is a strength, not a weakness. The ability for the actors to rattle off so many large, humbling scientific words - believably - is only a small part of the vast amount of talent on the show.

[Anonymous] gave it a9:
only bad thing is that it's on at the same time as NCIS! hard to win ratings on that front. show is actually getting better, less standard on the plot lines.

Kim O gave it a9:
Excellent science - would love to have clips to show in science lab. Many themes not appropriate for children. Love the dialogue and character development/interaction. Great show - one of my top 3.

Larry D. gave it a10:
Love this show!

[Anonymous] gave it a10:
This is the best show ever!!!!!! The chemistry between Booth and Brennan is wonderful!!!! The new pair of Angela/Hodgins helped the show as well. I just miss Dr. Goodman

Read more user comments...

Discuss this tv show in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: World News | Fantasy Football | Amy Winehouse | Baseball | E3 | Batman | Firefox 3 | iPhone 3G

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use