Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

TV

2009 Fall Season
2009 Summer Season
2008-09 Midseason
2008 Fall Season
2008 Summer Season
Best Of 2008
Best Of 2007
Best Of 2006
Best Of 2005

Recent/Upcoming
Movies & Specials

46 The Prisoner
AMC, 11/15

73 Collision
PBS, 11/15

70 Schmatta: Rags to Riches to Rags
HBO, 10/19

84 Monty Python: Almost the Truth (The Lawyer's Cut)
IFC, 10/18

80 Occupation
BBC America, 10/18

Recent/Upcoming
Series Premieres

47 The Wanda Sykes Show
Fox, Saturday

67 V
ABC, Tuesday

54 The League
FX, Thursday

81 Friday Night Lights Season Four
DirecTV 101, Wednesday

77 Endgame
PBS, Sunday

78 White Collar
USA, Friday

20 The Jeff Dunham Show
Comedy Central, Thursday

47 Lock 'n Load
Showtime, Wednesday

74 30 Rock Season Four
NBC, Thursday

65 Nip/Tuck Season Six
FX, Wednesday

49 Secret Girlfriend
Comedy Central, Wednesday

62 Sherri
Lifetime, Monday

48 Three Rivers
CBS, Sunday

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed shows.

Parks and Recreation

EMAILPRINTSERIES: NBC, Thursday 8:30p (30 minutes)

Parks and Recreation
59
6.6 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 25 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 30 votes
Read user comments
Rate this show >

Show Info

Genre(s): Comedy

Created By: Greg Daniels
Michael Schur

First Air Date: April 9, 2009

Summary

Starring Amy Poehler, Rashida Jones, Paul Schneider, Aziz Ansari, and Nick Offerman

The mockumentary comedy follows the life of Leslie Knope (Amy Poehler), a Parks and Recreation employee.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

80

Hollywood ReporterDaniel Carlson

To act as if Parks has to be measured against that show's [The Office] standard gives short shrift to a genuinely funny and engaging comedy that bears stylistic similarities to "Office" but has a heart and mind all its own.

Read Full Review >
75

Entertainment WeeklyKen Tucker

While I laughed out loud only a few times during Parks' pilot, I dug the performances, the attitude, and the atmosphere that's being created.

Read Full Review >
70

Boston GlobeMatthew Gilbert

Parks and Recreation has many distinctions, not least of all the hugely talented Poehler from "Saturday Night Live," who promises to develop Leslie slowly, without the haste required in sketch comedy. And the show has the potential to become a flip, witty political allegory.

Read Full Review >
70

Los Angeles TimesRobert Lloyd

It has a kind of sunny charm, a premise fit for a novel, and is built upon a pair of strong female leads, a rare enough thing in sitcoms. Poehler and Jones have a nice, contrapuntal rhythm. I stamp this show: approved.

Read Full Review >
70

Newark Star-LedgerAlan Sepinwall

It's not a finished product yet, and Poehler and the writers need to find more ways to distinguish Leslie from Michael Scott, but funny forgives an awful lot.

Read Full Review >
70

The New York TimesAlessandra Stanley

The supporting cast members have quirks, but they need stronger writing and reinforcements; “The Office” found its comic voice by adding characters to the ensemble, and Parks and Recreation would also benefit from a larger talent pool. The pilot episode isn’t perfect, but Ms. Poehler very nearly is.

Read Full Review >
70

Wall Street JournalDorothy Rabinowitz

There's more than enough absurd charm in the show, meanwhile, to make the wait worthwhile.

Read Full Review >
67

TimeJames Poniewozik

The Parks and Recreation pilot is funny, with mounds of potential. Its problem is that it seems to be actively downplaying its distinctiveness by emphasizing the surface resemblance to The Office.

Read Full Review >
67

NewsdayVerne Gay

Unfortunately, one show's a classic, the other a near knockoff. Nevertheless, Poehler's still got plenty of appeal here.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Sun-TimesPaige Wiser

All in all, it might be worth sticking with Parks and Recreation, because there are lots of funny little moments that could add up to a great series.

Read Full Review >
63

Slant MagazineAdam Keleman

The jarring, awkward humor is similarly facilitated in the pilot as well. It's now just a waiting game to see if this patchy episodic specimen can gradually move past its Office-inspired roots and trudge toward developing its own individual, winning skin.

Read Full Review >
60

SlateTroy Patterson

This is a civil servant who has yet to be jaded, and the show is just good enough to keep you turning back in to see her unwarranted optimism curdle.

Read Full Review >
60

The New YorkerNancy Franklin

There are many of them [good moments] in Parks and Recreation, in fact; virtually every scene in the first two episodes contains good bits, with quotable quotes, twists of language that viewers feel smart for getting, and visual gags. But the minutes don’t flow; they merely accrete, one bit on top of another.

Read Full Review >
60

Kansas City Star

It all has the potential to add up. Eventually.

Read Full Review >
50

Pittsburgh Post-GazetteRob Owen

Parks has its funny moments but the comedy's first episode also has a distant and chilly feel to it.

Read Full Review >
50

VarietyBrian Lowry

Series creators Greg Daniels and Michael Schur provide the show with moments of dry wit, and Poehler certainly has acting oblivious down to a wide-eyed science. Yet there's no escaping that this feels like "Office Lite," thrown together as a vehicle for the star rather than out of any grand inspiration.

Read Full Review >
50

Baltimore SunDavid Zurawik

The problem with the pilot is in tone. Self-important and silly but optimistic and sweet is a hard mark to hit week after week.

Read Full Review >
50

San Francisco ChronicleTim Goodman

The pilot is not especially funny. But it has potential.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago TribuneMaureen Ryan

Ron Swanson's (Nick Offerman) short “tour” of his office--a loose, throwaway moment at the end of the episode--is the funniest thing about the otherwise strained Parks pilot.

Read Full Review >
50

USA TodayRobert Bianco

Parks never expends enough energy to even approach funny, but even if it were more amusing, that sour whiff of gratuitous cruelty would still linger.

Read Full Review >
50

New York PostLinda Stasi

In its favor, Parks doesn't have a laugh track. On the minus side, it doesn't get many laughs.

Read Full Review >
40

Philadelphia Daily NewsEllen Gray

Poehler's funny because she's a smart blonde, not a dumb one. Here, she's reduced to one of TV's default settings.

Read Full Review >
40

New York Daily NewsDavid Hinckley

Clueless, oblivious characters are a foundation of most sitcoms, but this show needs more of a humor base than a wall mural that shows Pawnee's first white settlers massacring the natives.

Read Full Review >
40

Washington PostTom Shales

Poehler's show unfortunately isn't worthy of her. It's dry and hesitant when one longs for it to be raucous and madcap.

Read Full Review >
30

Philadelphia InquirerJonathan Storm

Parks and Recreation emerges a miscast mess.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this show is 6.6 (out of 10) based on 30 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

John H gave it a6:
Only really watchable because of the shows surrounding it.

Kathleen V gave it a1:
I decided to watch this show because I really enjoy Amy Peohler's comedy and my son 's impro teacher is on the show. ...But I will not watch it again unless the writers stop their stereotyping of people over 60. I consider my self a fairly attractive 60 yr. old who exercises and does not need naps in the middle of concerts. I am employed as a Special Education teacher and keep up with all the younger staff. Perhaps NBC doesn't care about the baby boomers. What about Hillary Clinton, Amy?

Steven K gave it a10:
Each show gets better and better. The show is hilarious. In fact, I may even find it funnier than The Office (I know, blasphemy). People should ignore the initial reviews, and really give this show a chance!

Zach D gave it a3:
This is a very poor rip-off of The Office. It's mostly unfunny with a few moments of actual comedy interspersed throughout. I'll be surprised if this is back for a full second season.

Josh F gave it a9:
This show is a wonderful example of postmodern values: creating a satire of what we view modern politics as, pushing a non-traditional view of personal interrelationships, and gives us great irony and paradox with Amy's character. It is a pleasure to watch and laugh at!

Andy R gave it an8:
A little too similar to The Office at times, but at the same time has a personality and heart all it's own. A funny concept, well executed and very entertaining.

Luke S gave it a2:
I've watched both episodes, and I tried to like it, and did not succeed. The problem I found was that it's too quiet, there's not enough going on to keep you interested. Another issue was the characters- they aren't characterized well. They have surfaces - character archetypes - but I failed to find any depth. Amy Poehler is out of her element here, she's supposed to be tough, not wishy washy. If only her enthusiastic optimism was gung-ho fervor instead, then her character would be interesting. One excuse I have heard for high ratings is that it's going to get better- but this is a review of the show right now. Any show could fluctuate at any time. Potential and promise are insufficient reasons for a high score, only a mediocre score. I did not see any potential other than if the characters were rewritten.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use