Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

TV

2009-10 Midseason
2009 Fall Season
2009 Summer Season
2008-09 Midseason
2008 Fall Season
2008 Summer Season
Best Of 2009
Best Of 2008
Best Of 2007
Best Of 2006
Best Of 2005

Recent/Upcoming
Movies & Specials

87 The Pacific
HBO, 3/14

51 Who Is Clark Rockefeller?
Lifetime, 3/13

59 The 39 Steps
PBS, 2/28

79 Reporter
HBO, 2/18

84 Temple Grandin
HBO, 2/6

83 Soul Train: The Hippest Trip in America
VH1, 2/6

52 A Family Is a Family Is a Family: A Rosie O'Donnell Celebration
HBO, 1/31

40 Live for the Moment
CBS, 1/28

Recent/Upcoming
Series Premieres

62 Ugly Americans
Comedy Central, Wednesday

80 Justified
FX, Tuesday

52 The Price of Beauty
VH1, Monday

52 Sons of Tucson
Fox, Sunday

34 High Society
CW, Wednesday

54 Who Do You Think You Are?
NBC, Friday

61 Parenthood
NBC, Tuesday

77 Southland Season Two
TNT, Tuesday

49 The Tonight Show with Jay Leno
NBC, Weekdays

41 The Marriage Ref
NBC, Thursday

62 The Ricky Gervais Show
HBO, Friday

59 How to Make It in America
HBO, Sunday

64 Prison Wives
Investigation Discovery, Wednesday

62 Survivors
BBC America, Saturday

43 Past Life
Fox, Tuesday

56 Celebrity Fit Club: Boot Camp Season Seven
VH1, Monday

59 Undercover Boss
CBS, Sunday

44 The Michael Vick Project
BET, Tuesday

44 Kell on Earth
Bravo, Monday

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed shows.

Robin Hood

EMAILPRINTSERIES: BBC America, Saturday 9:00p (60 minutes)

Robin Hood
70
7.8 User Score:

Generally favorable reviews

Based on 9 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 71 votes
Read user comments
Rate this show >

Show Info

Genre(s): Action / Adventure

Created By: Dominic Minghella
Foz Allan

First Air Date: March 3, 2007

Summary

Starring Jonas Armstrong, Keith Allen, Richard Armitage, Lucy Griffiths, Sam Troughton, Gordon Kennedy, Harry Lloyd, and Joe Armstrong

This new 13-episode series represents the BBC's attempt at a fresher, hipper take (complete with modern pop culture references) on the classic Robin Hood legend. It was a hit when it aired in Britain.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100

Christian Science MonitorGloria Goodale

This really is a Robin of Locksley for the "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" generation.

Read Full Review >
75

Entertainment WeeklyAlynda Wheat

For the willing, it's still a story worth hearing. [2 Mar 2007, p.64]

70

Hollywood ReporterBarry Garron

If there is a chink to this series' armor, it is in the casting of Armstrong in the title role.

Read Full Review >
70

Pittsburgh Post-GazetteRob Owen

A zippy, fun update.

Read Full Review >
70

San Jose Mercury NewsCharlie McCollum

You'll get hooked on it early and should stick around to the very end -- even though you have a good idea of what's coming.

Read Full Review >
70

Los Angeles TimesRobert Lloyd

"Robin Hood" boasts most of the usual problems with low-budget epics.... But the show has wit and energy.

Read Full Review >
70

The New York TimesGinia Bellafante

Briskly paced and amusingly corny.

Read Full Review >
63

People WeeklyTom Gliatto

I wish the show had a little more verisimilitude--the peasants' homes look cheap, not poor--but it's zippy mindless fun. [5 Mar 2007, p.37]

40

VarietyBrian Lowry

If this attempt to put a youthful spin on Robin Hood isn't bad per se, it's at best a warmed-over remake that would be diverting for kids if it wasn't occasionally quite violent.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this show is 7.8 (out of 10) based on 71 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Latrobe P. gave it a3:
Did you ever wonder what the A-Team would look like if: 1. They were wearing tights 2. They were lead by a girly man better suited to a role on the WB or a tween vampire movie 3. Mr T was even more illiterate and not half as charming Well, this is it - much "sturm und drang" lots of swords, lots of arrows, but no dead bad guys - feh

Nik J. gave it a3:
When I first saw this series promoted I was hoping for a production of the quality of “Rome” or “Deadwood” – a gritty, extended reweaving of a classic tale. The series outline is well constructed and introduces some moral and emotional complexity into the story. But the scripts, directing and acting are all over the place. It’s like a case of dueling producers who don’t know if they are making a historical drama or a pantomime. Go camp, go real or go home. The locations are great but the inhabitants are simply not believable, and some, like Robin’s whining sidekick, are simply annoying. Chubby, “starving” peasants wearing jolly costumes seemingly plucked from the racks of a modern, if eccentric, consignment store. The Sheriff’s thugs are likewise over dressed in shimmering faux chain-mail, while Nott and his posse look like they just stepped off the ramp at an Italian fashion show. What disappoints most is the potential that was squandered making this series. Low budget doesn’t have to mean poor production values. A little more spent on research and writing could have given us something magical. Maybe I expect too much.

CharredToast gave it a0:
The show is bromidic, ridiculous, but not funny. Robin Hood tries to be serious, but it is hard to take it serious when the show mixes in modern day phrases, people wear polyester prints, and it preaches a laughable morality. Let me get this straight? It would be immoral for Robin Hood to kill the sheriff who tortures, oppresses, and murders people. I found myself saying” Just kill him! He is right there in front of you! Kill the jerk!” The plots have been beyond silly and the acting mediocre at its best. This is below the quality of Hercules or Xena.

Khristian R gave it a3:
This is like the MTV version of Robin Hood. Its bad, the history is wrong. There's nothing wrong with updating a story and injecting it with modernism but this does it awfully and at times its cringy. There's too much wrong about it. Its like a safe version, it doesn't know whether to be serious, to be humourous, it fails on most of the levels. If you like Robin Hood and want a serious version watch the one made in the mid 80s. If you want a comedy version, then Tony Robinson's version.

Jessica S. gave it a10:
I absolutely love this show! I stumbled across it by chance when I was home sick one day and channel surfing. I love it, a lot. In my opinion, the acting is great, I love the action scenes, I really enjoy the chemistry between the characters and all in all, I recommend it to anybody who is remotely interested in watching it. I even shelled out $80.00 to get the first season on DVD!

Larry V. gave it a5:
I really want to like this show, and for me that means being able to suspend belief and "get into" the various plots, dramatic twists, etc. I can overlook some of the dialog (OK, Robin telling Little John to "get a grip" is a bit much for middle ages speak). But please, guys...that Robin and his outlaws could simply wear hats and walk through Nottingham unrecognized stretches the credulity a bit too far. Did Maid Marian really pluck her eyebrows and wear makeup? Did Sir Guy really dress in black leather? Give him a mask and he could be Batman! I want to suspend belief and get into the stories, I really do...but the writers are making it so hard.

Brandon S. gave it a9:
Definitely a very good show. It's like a modern update on shows like Hercules and Xena - action, humor, romance, drama, heroes and villains. But these days there's more emphasis on long-term story arcs and sharper characters. And Robin has that. Though there are fights, they're not gory and overly violent - they're just exciting. Definitely worth checking out.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | March Madness | TV | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use