- Network: Discovery Channel
- Series Premiere Date: May 1, 2013
- Season #: 1
Review this tv show
May 11, 2013I love the idea of this show, however it does appear to be based on the common reality show basis i.e. keep the players who are the most dramatic and axe the ones that are too weak to be on television. I would also like to see the equations that they use to formulate the ideas, both from the producers of the challenges and the teams.
My other concern is that in the real world there is time for testing. Science usually involves testing, and more testing. It is because the show eliminates that aspect that I have mixed reviews.… Expand
Jun 13, 2013I have been watching each episode but after last nights judges decision they lost me!
Are the judges paid?? It is beyond reason how the judges picked the team to win the car catching competition. First of all, are we looking for practical solutions to Engineering issues or seeing how ridiculous we can be. Secondly, what did the car look like after it ran into the steel fence the team built!
That gizmo, (including labor) had to cost 3 times as much as the simple net device. Its obvious that the young contestants are very gifted, HOWEVER, if they had submitted that device to someone market they would be sadly disappointed. Good luck finding the next group of contestants! Last night was a sad display of judging a project on the merits of REAL world applications.… Expand
Aug 11, 2013After finished watching Season 1 Episode 7 "Catching Cars", I personally felt that the show has depleted its credibility and I didn't even bother to watch the supposedly-climax finale.
The "steel wall" solution should not have won over the "safety net" solution because it is a flawed design for the following reasons:
(1) It's ability to stop a car travelling at 35mph and keep both the car and passenger safe will vary greatly by terrain. On a slippery surface (wet, snow, or ice), I doubt it will have enough friction to stop the car. On a very rough surface where friction is high, I doubt it will keep the passenger safe!
(2) It won't work for any car that has 4WD or rear-wheel drive; the car will simply drive away with some decoration!
(3) Mark Fuller's (one of the judges) explanation (on the official website) of why the "safety net" solution didn't win was because the design has a disadvantage that "these brakes had to be sized to match the mass of the on-coming vehicle. Had this been a huge truck, it wouldn't stop". True, the brakes may need to be sized to match the on-coming vehicle, but at least the brakes can be sized. Where as to stop a "huge truck", I doubt that the "steel wall" solution can be easily sized up!!
(4) It takes more effort to build, more materials to build and is unproven.
Based on the above analysis, I cast doubt on the judge's motivation when choosing a winning solution.
I have doubts that the judgement was based on the "winning team" (ie, based on individuals) rather than the "winning design".… Expand
Sep 21, 2013Just watched the food production episode and i got tired soon.
First all the drama about some bad guy being elected for the wild card and all others complaining about him being rude.
Then they start making a plan for a machine.
One of the contestants talks about a 3D printer thing and gets the job because the jury was very impressed.
But the thing she build didn't have anything to do with 3D at all...
She should have lost just because the machine wasn't anywhere near to what she was talking about.
Probably won't bother watching it again.… Expand
The usual stuff of such shows--arguments among team members; a race against the clock--is served up, though here the disagreements are peppered with phrases out of a physics class about kinetic friction, static friction and so on.
In the end, we come away from Big Brain Theory realizing that nerds can be just as insufferable as anyone, and just as interesting. The only thing that seems to separate the competitors on Big Brain from those on “Survivor” is that the nerds wear more clothes.