User Score
6.5
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 155 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 99 out of 155
-
Mixed: 23 out of 155
-
Negative: 33 out of 155
Review this tv show
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
TonyDec 4, 20092
-
-
SidRNov 11, 20093
-
-
NerijusDNov 7, 20091Incredibly bad. One of the worst pilots I've seen in my life. The acting is especially disgusting!
-
-
Aug 8, 20112this show features a lot of claustrophobic cgi-caged greenroom-filmed scenes. doesn't even try to get a match to the 1984 mini series original props. the artwork is quite decent, which may be necessary not to get in the viewer's face too much. actors faces are actually hd compatible. writing and plot line are unpleasantly bad. filming has a more conservative approach.
-
Jun 30, 20120
-
RobertB.Nov 4, 20092This was really bad. They had taken none of the good parts from the old series. This is just standard "in-the-box" crap.
-
-
WendellM.Nov 4, 20093I'll give any show 15 minutes to wow me. I gave this one 30 and pfft nothing. There was little emotion and no drama in the acting. Slick looks can't carry this one.
-
-
BobNNov 4, 20092
-
-
JayN.Nov 3, 20094
-
-
EricNov 6, 20093Pilot moved WAY too fast. Everything was too predictable. I was really looking forward to this and was very disappointed. Will probably give it a few more episodes to see if the producers can salvage the badly written plot & dialogues.
-
-
EliascDec 9, 20093
-
-
ArianoANov 19, 20094This show is not that entertaining. It just doesn't flow. Too much dead air between lines. It needs a better script.
-
-
PhilippRNov 23, 20093predictable and booring
-
-
ECNov 3, 20091Are you kidding me? This was a snooze-fest! The acting was poor, the writing was boring, and the plot is way-too-predictable. This was the dumbest thing I have seen on TV.
-
-
SANov 4, 20090Terrible show. Flimsy storyline, badly acted, such a flimsy representation of the brilliant original. Very disappointing.
-
-
KarlLNov 7, 20092Blows it's load in the first few minutes. No suspense. Boring boring boring.
-
-
JamesMNov 8, 20093Extremely watered-down remake of a classic series. Rushed the first mini-series' plot points into 40 minutes. No one is very into their roles. Total wash.
-
-
CGNov 29, 20093Lazy writing: - Too much exposition. - Characters are unbelievably stupid. - Dialog is not believable Don't like the direction they are taking: - Not enough mystery, doesn't really make you think or wonder.... it is what it is - paper thin.
-
-
Mar 25, 20113I'm really dis-appointed by this show. I love Morena Baccarin and she is wonderful as the arch baddie but the rest of the show is a real let down. Science Fiction has to be well written and internally consistent if it's to engage and hold an audience but V just comes across as (yet another) TV series written by non-sci fi writers who don't have a grasp of the genre.
-
Nov 2, 20110
-
KarenNov 4, 20094Sucktastic.
-
-
Feb 18, 20130
-
80No gold mine of symbolism is worth a damn when the show itself doesn’t have good old storytelling mojo behind it. And, based on the premiere, V has enough narrative drive and character definition to pull viewers into the creepy suspense of its dystopian world.
-
Judging by the first episode, V seems like a solid adaptation.
-
As an adventure series bristling with ideas, it's V+. Or as we grade 'em on Earth: B+