• Network: Showtime
  • Series Premiere Date: Aug 7, 2005
  • Season #: 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 7 , 8
Metascore
78 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 16 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 16
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 16
  3. Negative: 0 out of 16
  1. 100
    Happily, "Weeds" hasn't dropped a petal or missed even a beat this season.
  2. "Weeds" is colossally great... a series far better than its premise and utterly essential for devotees of smart, entertaining television.
  3. 90
    This is damn fertile soil for a comedy, and creator Jenji Kohan and the writers of "Weeds" farm it for all it's worth in the show's second season, cultivating vivid, surprising stories that naturally transcend the typical limitations of the half-hour format.
  4. Reviewed by: Ken Tucker
    83
    [It] sometimes tries a bit too hard. Mellow out, dudes--we're addicted already. [18 Aug 2006, p.128]
  5. 80
    Thankfully, "Weeds" avoids the strained farce of "Desperate Housewives," and despite being billed as a comedy, the perceptively written show is actually a credible look at lives stuck in neutral and people almost trapped by their addiction to a certain level of upper-middle class comfort.
  6. It makes mincemeat of conventional TV taboos and has, in Parker, a star whom the camera adores.
  7. There's a depth, a richness to the series now that was only suggested [in the first season].
  8. Parker turns in a performance bubbling over with vitality and believability, even when the script itself strains credulity or when individual lines of dialogue slip too much into sitcom punch lines and rhythms.
  9. 75
    The best thing from Season 1 remains the same: Mary-Louise Parker. [21 Aug 2006, p.37]
  10. 75
    A comedy anchored in the flawed, deeply genuine humanity of its characters often delivers the rollicking natural high of laughter.
  11. It's perhaps appropriate to the subject matter that the show's main appeal is sensual rather than cerebral, grounded in a host of superb performances.
  12. "Weeds" is still an outstanding show, but it would be better if it didn't push so hard to stand out.
  13. "Weeds' " executive producers, headed by creator Jenji Kohan, get kudos for keeping the show's balance of heartfelt drama and screwy comedy intact.
  14. Reviewed by: Matt Roush
    70
    There's enough to enjoy in Weeds that you could get a contact high just by tuning in.
  15. Reviewed by: Brian Lowry
    70
    "Weeds" still isn't quite funny or startling enough to become a compulsion but delivers enough tantalizing hits to merit the TiVo "season pass" treatment.
  16. 63
    In better moments, "Weeds" proves small kerflops can be made interesting and fun to watch. In lesser moments, not so.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 114 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 56 out of 65
  2. Negative: 6 out of 65
  1. One of the best seasons of television I have ever seen. Great cast, well-written characters, lots of laugh out loud moments and genuinely engaging storylines all the way through. Full Review »
  2. 10
    watch here new episode of weeds - After three years in prison, Nancy receives an early parole to a New York halfway house and discovers her promised witness protection services are no longer necessary; Silas, Shane, Andy and Doug have settled into their new lives in Copenhagen. - http://new-tvseries.blogspot.com/search/label/Weeds Full Review »
  3. Season 2 was much better than season 1, but then again, a show has to have it's time to get going... to tell it's back story... to set up plots. I thought season one was pretty good and wanted to give this show a chance. I'm glad I did. Full Review »