Average User Score: 4.0Nov 13, 2012Absolutely nothing new, if you would update World at War's graphics, you could not tell which one is the 5 years older game. And speaking ofAbsolutely nothing new, if you would update World at War's graphics, you could not tell which one is the 5 years older game. And speaking of graphics, they seem strangely bad for a "triple A" game, i kept getting vibes of "console port" and "outdated engine"
Single player is defined by the word Boring. I did not even want to play the optional "RTS"-style defense missions after the first mandatory one.… Expand
Average User Score: 4.8Jul 6, 2012Mediocre game crippled with the laziest console port of the year.
ATTN: STEAM version of the game cannot be currently played with otherMediocre game crippled with the laziest console port of the year.
ATTN: STEAM version of the game cannot be currently played with other versions due to differing patch cycles, game does not recognize different versions and kicks you out of the multiplayer games after 10 seconds. I assume this will never be fixed and pops up after every patch.
The game was supposed to be "back to the roots" -type of game reminding of old Rainbow6 games and first Ghost Recon. guess what, level 2 is a rail-shooter
here is couple of crippling problems that need to be fixed before you should even consider this game.
Drone is controlled with wasd+mouse+ARROW KEYS, i guess they want me to use both hands while smacking my head on keyboard to change altitude
80% of menus cannot be interacted with mouse
Random menus need to be used with arrow keys, which are not used for anything else* in the game. nice logic guys.
No game hosting, only matchmaking and non-stop waiting for host migration from players leaving
Console legacy still present, help texts for "Press A or B" etc.
other than the **** execution, i guess it could be fun... if i could play it with friends and not get kicked all the time due to version mismatch… Expand