|By date||Most helpful reviews||By my score||By metascore||By user score|
Average User Score: 5.7Apr 23, 2012First game was great. Second was even better. So you can assume that third will be the best in the series and again Game of The Year ???. NotFirst game was great. Second was even better. So you can assume that third will be the best in the series and again Game of The Year ???. Not in this case. To begin with do you remember how many side quests there were in first game and each of them were interesting in their own way. Second game was little bit different, it tried to be action game with RPG elements so quests weren't that awesome as in first game but still were good. Well in third game there are two types of quests: N7 "missions" and Citadel "missions". First one nothing as N7 missions in previous games. All maps that feature in this "missions" are from multiplayer and tasks are "find and bring something back" or "kill everything". For quests were you need to find something and bring it back you would want a journal so you would know were to go. The "Journal" in ME3 has only description of quest, nothing about were we can find item or were bring it. New Citadel also sucks. It just sucks. Now I would like to skip part about interaction with NPCs and Normandy cause it will take a lots of time. The major problem with game is endings. Remember when developers said that non of the endings will be the same ??? Remember when they said that multiplayer won't be connected to single player ??? Remember when this bastards said that all choices we made in previous games will huge influence on ending ??? Either I play it wrong either developers are really bad liars. To get different endings we need war assets. To get them we need to play multiplayer a lot and a little bit of single player. Then we need to choose between 3 different lights. Light which we choose will be color of explosion. There is some difference like Reapers will destroy Earth or Shepard can survive but you got the point. So what EA did looks like Call of Duty when it was just a baby. With each game it gets worser and worser until they will find another company... Awful quests, ugly locations, f****d up ending, day one DLC and unnecessary interactions make this game worst game of this year. Yes, worser than Amy...… Expand
Average User Score: 3.2Jan 1, 2012Unfortunately Modern Warfare 3 worst game in CoD franchise. Single Player Company has only 15 missions (Each mission will take 20 - 30 minutesUnfortunately Modern Warfare 3 worst game in CoD franchise. Single Player Company has only 15 missions (Each mission will take 20 - 30 minutes to complete). Before release I thought there will be lots of WW missions and there almost won't be Makarov chasing. Well there 5 WW missions in Europe (1 - England, 2 - France, 2 - Germany). Other 10 missions will be Soap / Price story with really "unexpected" ending.
Stupid enemies, weird characters, worst weapon's sound (Sometimes I was turning sound off) and awful soundtrack again proves how developers care about players.
There also a Spec Ops with old Mission and new Survival Mode. But both of them suck ! All Survival maps and weapons + attachments (NOT ALL !!!) from Multiplayer. And almost every missions in Spec Ops are maps from SP Company but with different tasks (sometimes map is reversed). So all that developers said about Spec Ops before release b******t !
Now it's time for multiplayer. All what we get is two new modes, new camouflages, perks, kill and death strikes + new weapons and attachments (I didn't count maps because they always add them). Multiplayer is so unbalanced - almost everybody camps, using akimbo weapons or doing jump kills. New kill streaks so stupid. It's really easy to kill Juggernaut, and with vehicles almost impossible to kill somebody (Because everybody uses stupid perks). For unknown reason they made 3 kill streak packages. Assault (After death kill streak points reset), Support (After death kill streak points don't reset) and Specialist (You earning perks instead of usual rewards + after death kill streak points reset). What I liked is Weapon Levels. You're earning XP for weapons by killing enemies with it, then earning new Weapon Levels. With each level you unlock attachments, camouflages or proficiencies (perks for weapons). And there one last new thing - Prestige Shop. When you get new Prestige you get Prestige token. These tokens you can spend on unlocking gear or double XP or new icons and titles. That's all new in MW3 Multiplayer. So it's worst mix of all previous CoD games with few new things.
Unfortunately it's old good CoD 4: MW with all new "awesome" c**p for retarded. 2 - 3 cool trailers and Activision will get lots of money. So don't buy this game for yourself or friend or your greatest enemy because it's just a HUGE waste of your time and money.… Expand