|By date||Most helpful reviews||By my score||By metascore||By user score|
Average User Score: 9.1Dec 5, 2015DLC is quite good overall. Unfortunately, it was much too easy for me. But it is all my fault. I spent quite a lot of time exploring chaliceDLC is quite good overall. Unfortunately, it was much too easy for me. But it is all my fault. I spent quite a lot of time exploring chalice dungeons and I got my hero pumped up to the level 225. With the most powerful gems and +10 weapon, I beat all bosses except one with first attempt. I would also beat the final boss with first attempt, but I was not prepared properly, I had 15 blood vials instead of 20 and run out in the process. With carefull exploration and curiosity of the secrets, It took me like 5 hours overall. I love Bloodborne but the love ends here, I never play any game twice. I am looking forward to Dark Souls 3 definitely. Good job From Software, please continue with the serie!… Expand
Average User Score: 7.6Oct 9, 2015I am surprised how user score is much more adequate than critic's. Starting with great things: huge amount of work put into creating this hugeI am surprised how user score is much more adequate than critic's. Starting with great things: huge amount of work put into creating this huge and detailed sandbox. Glitches and bugs not visible. Few fresh missions. And that is it. Now negatives: I finished gta3, vice city, sa, 4, 4lcs and V feels nothing fresh, I felt like I played it many times already. Soundtrack is with no single song to remember. You buy extremaly expensive cars and you can not use them inside mission, dissapointing. You can not upgrade your character's main vehicle. This works a lot like deattachment from the game flow. You take time to compse your character appereance, only to find that next mission is replacing your effort with one from scenario. The game tone: until now, few days after finishing the game, I can not find the essence: was it serious, was it joke, was it drama or comedy? I do not care for multiplayer, I only started it once, only to find that city is dead, and some punk chasing and shooting me from heli with automatic weapon. There is maybe more than that but I did not care. The meter that is never wrong to me is: I like the game then I can not stop playing it. I do not like the game, I need to force myself to play it. Well, since as a player I could not miss gtaV anyway, I had to force myself to play it and finish the campaign.… Expand
Average User Score: 8.6Apr 14, 2013Definitely not score 10 game. I finished it about 2 weeks ago and I do not remember anything special about it apart from the ending. To thoseDefinitely not score 10 game. I finished it about 2 weeks ago and I do not remember anything special about it apart from the ending. To those ignorants who do not get the ending: some of in-game objects and phenomenons are based on quantum theories started by Einstein long time ago (read or google it, multiverse etc). With this knowledge, game is getting much more interesting. However it is not as good as Bioshock 1 and 2, it is step back in every aspect. Still a good game.… Expand
Average User Score: 5.5Mar 22, 2013It reminds me of "when critics and gamers disagree" situation. This is the weakest Gears game, played them all. It should be dlc instead ofIt reminds me of "when critics and gamers disagree" situation. This is the weakest Gears game, played them all. It should be dlc instead of full price game. It looks like People Can Fly got clear instruction: create few missions, do not screw up original game mechanics. It sooo the same, campaign is boooring and story is completely flat. Then you have extra campaign mission. I thought: "yes, it could not be that bad, here is where Gears begins, its dark and feels like Gears" but then it finishes right away. Narration type is of the worst possible kind, retrospection. This means nothing bad will happen to the one who is speaking, and all squad is speaking. 3 minutes short levels do not help either. On the contrary it is very bad idea, becouse all atmosphere is immediately lost. Minor changes to multi and few new maps is much too less to grade this game as high as metacritic average. Weak and boring to me.… Expand
Average User Score: 7.9Feb 19, 2013Game is fun. Cutting mechanism is as promised. Graphics and animations are ok, only levels designs feel empty and uninspired. Good characterGame is fun. Cutting mechanism is as promised. Graphics and animations are ok, only levels designs feel empty and uninspired. Good character creations, feels like Kojima himself put some of his genius into it. There is some atmosphere of MGS frenchise. Combat system is simple, but the trick of zendetsu and arms cutting makes it much more interesting. Its very short, too short. Story is 5-6 hours max.
The game leaves excellent base for slasher of the incoming next gens.… Expand
Average User Score: 6.3Jan 28, 2013Huge dissapointment. Unskippable credits just rolled. These days its either nuke or ufo. Here is the latter. Some great promises from previousHuge dissapointment. Unskippable credits just rolled. These days its either nuke or ufo. Here is the latter. Some great promises from previous installments have been broken. The mysterious story of ancients turned out to be silly and shallow - some answers are best if not told. So the series is over now, completely exhausted and dried out of essentials that made first Assassins Creed establish its name. Every another game in the series was loosing its ground piece by piece, until this quite pathetic conclusion. What about game critics reviews? Game of the year awards? Did we really played the same game, or they got some bonuses together with reviewers copies?
Maybe its just me, did you guys who live in USA enjoy this somehow more than me?
Graphics: great. Sound: great. Story: promising at first, but completely failed in the end. Game mechanics: fights are way too easy though animations are impressive, STEALTH IS WITH NO PROPER TOOLS, eagle vision is completely useless, horses are unnecessary, leap of faith is sour becouse Connor cannot see where the spot is. Side missions: too many, not worth your time, you get nothing apart from silly dresses and minor improvements. Some whole branches of side missions should be eliminated by quality dept. (letters, deliveries, crafting, trading) these are trivial and pointless. Testers let through serious bugs, it seems that they were only able to test until New York, where glitches festival starts. Strong points: naval missions.
Conclusion: for me its just one of these games that make easy money for the publisher. Consists of too many elements that can not make consistent picture. "Shitload of side missions in your face player". Epic finale of the series is not there. No more please. Play first AC and make real reboot, becouse you lost direction. Not the complete failure but still huge dissapointment.… Expand