|By date||Most helpful reviews||By my score||By metascore||By user score|
Average User Score: 5.2Nov 29, 2010When I heard about CoD BO, I was saying to myself "Hmm Treyarch did an amazing job with WaW in my opinion, This one should be more balancedWhen I heard about CoD BO, I was saying to myself "Hmm Treyarch did an amazing job with WaW in my opinion, This one should be more balanced and more fun than MW2"
Seems like I was wrong.
First of all, FPS drops and freezes on high-end PC's, As most of you probably know.
Then, The Multiplayer is more balanced, But its just not fun at all. A average number of hackers.
The single player is simply horrible. 80% of everything is scripted in the campaign, Overuse of unrealistic events, And above all, Very short campaign.
I remember playing rare games on the N64, These games took minimum 30 hours to complete at 100%. Even now, Several old FPS game had a lot of re-playability, Such as DOOM, Half-Life 1 and more. I still play these games even after ten years!
Black ops is 4-5 hours max to complete the campaign, And the zombie mode is not entertaining at all.
Multiplayer takes around 15 hours to get to max level, And I don't waste time on prestige because I play games for fun, Not for ranks.
I'd rather do the Vice City or San Andreas campaign once more than play this game one more minute.
Activision, You have ripped me off for the last time, I will NEVER buy a CoD title again in my entire life.
This game get a big 0.… Expand