Average User Score: 6.0Sep 27, 2014Best FPS ever atm.
Have many issues but there is no better one to counter it. My main problem with this game that their development isBest FPS ever atm.
Have many issues but there is no better one to counter it.
My main problem with this game that their development is going towards COD.
ANd thats not good sign.
They try to take COD market while ignoring their fanbase.… Expand
Average User Score: 8.0Sep 27, 20143rd game of the series. And have some Improvement over previous Wargames.
Best strategy game at the moment for sure. beats COH2 and MOW3rd game of the series. And have some Improvement over previous Wargames.
Best strategy game at the moment for sure. beats COH2 and MOW series easily In making sense and realism category.
But its not enough to give it 8 or 9. Especially when they wont learn from previous games.
Really huge maps and beautiful maps. Again plains and now Ships!.
Rivers can be crossed now by swimming units - no choke points.
You can really go crazy tactic now. It became much harder game since tank spams are not that successful any more. I personally stopped using tanks at all.
Def. you have to be much more smarter and careful with your units.
Unfortunately instead of fixing basic issues they just keep adding more and more units.
Looks to me they spreading they attention on everything ships, planes and miillion units and nations.
Instead of narrowing and making it flawless.
After 2 games they finally added some features people were asking from beginning ":
- map view in lobby,
- ban option from room ,
And it only took them 3 games to do it! Congrats Eugene! You are fast learners hehe.
Ask yourself a question why it took you soo long. What kind of people work at Eugene that don't what's going on in multi games that you need to sometimes BAN people. Once again, it took them 3 games to do it!
Stupidity of that team is pretty much visible. Yeah add more units to counter that.
But that would be it. Still no black list, still no availability to see what kind of deck your team-mate have.
And other simple things that should be straight forward for strategy game.
Looks like they hit their mind capacity and ideas limit.
Good to know its last game from this series.
Still no strategy level in multi. It is in single player, but in multi ? nope.
Just one map game where everybody throws units on each other mindlessly without bigger picture option.
It seems nobody from strategy games devs can do it these days. Wonder why is that?
Would that mean people who make strategy games have no clue about those games and are not fans of them.. like Eugene.
Eugene studios had potential and some great ideas but it run out of them long time ago.
Since then their motto is "ADD MORE UNITS". Only because of the forum they were improving game.
This is just sad.
Still you should buy this game despite my harsh review .
Its only playable strategy game going towards realism atm.
But don't expect miracles here.
And like always in Wargame series - good team-mates. Without them you are screwed.
I say like this On W:ALB I had 812 hours. On W:RD I have only 100.
So if you didnt played before in wargame series. BUY IT you will love it.
If you did played before in wargame it wont have that initial sparkle to keep you long on it like me.
Eugene - make good strategy game! Hire some people who actually have good idea about strategy!
I dare you.… Expand
Average User Score: 6.0May 4, 2014This game is basically Assult squad 1.2. Nothing else.
Poor way to cash by devs on same game that they didnt changed from 7 years.
CanThis game is basically Assult squad 1.2. Nothing else.
Poor way to cash by devs on same game that they didnt changed from 7 years.
Can somebody tell me whats the difference between Men of War and Assult Squad?
Maybe bit improved graphics.. tiny gameplay changes..and nothing else. they keep re-doing this garbage for years.
Most retarded system ever:
You can play game against computer with other people. But all points for reinf. are shared..so
if you wont buy quick enough you wont get anything. And thats brings everybody buying inf cause its cheaper.
And even if you manage to save for something more expensive then you may wont get it cause its randomly assigned to somebody else. How the **** you can do anything then? Who made this system?
MOST retarded system EVER.
Dont buy this game. Even when its fro 5 euro. Dont dare to buy it.
Hope they go bankrupt for this scam.… Expand
Average User Score: 7.2Feb 5, 2014Very very simple turn based ww2 game.
Im really happy that devs. at least made some effort and made changes to graphics comparing to otherVery very simple turn based ww2 game.
Im really happy that devs. at least made some effort and made changes to graphics comparing to other 150 turn garbage turn based games that comes out constantly..and make no improvement or changes.
But game mechanics are very simple.. very childish and gets very boring after a couple days of playing.
Nothing advanced in this game..simplicity of this game reminds me of RUSE in RTS genre..
some people might like it.. but its get quickly boring.
Its def. for younger players , would say up to 18 yr max.… Expand
Average User Score: tbdFeb 3, 2014One of the handfull of strategy game properly made.. maybe it have bad graphics but it makes sense..actually!
Youre starting as a platoonOne of the handfull of strategy game properly made.. maybe it have bad graphics but it makes sense..actually!
Youre starting as a platoon comander of inf/tank unit..you can choose.. and youre climbing up..
I think it was up to DIV even.
So as a tank comander you have 4 tanks..when youre comanding company you get 12 tanks plus HQ..
but of course there are random units beside yours on the front that support your war effort.
After time you get art. support.. heavy guns.. or light..mortars? sure.. tank destroyers.. everything that would be in real life unit is on map..
Shame nobody can remake this game in turn base mode with good graphics..and in rts style.
really try this.! realistic strategy fans will love it.… Expand
Average User Score: 7.5Feb 3, 2014We have 2014..and they still make games like that.. which is basically copy of turn based strategy games from 90's..20 years passed and youWe have 2014..and they still make games like that.. which is basically copy of turn based strategy games from 90's..20 years passed and you still cant think of doing something new?
But i wouldnt mind that at all to be honest.. IF it was done right. But they **** it up, and heres why.
SO youre comanding front/ army group. for example.. campaing in poland.. and your units suppose to represent ..div?/reg/ bat? ok.. so we can order aa for example flak 36 or something, wait a minute..whole unit flak36? hm.. how about tanks? pzr 2? at ? So units actually represent single units..but they are placed on grand scale map scenario and they are switched to div./bat/reg? HOW THOSE THAT MAKE SENSE???
It dosent..instead of making like Eastern front.. battle on "local" level..where you started with your own platoon.. and every single unit in that platoon were represented..so you had 4 tanks in platoon.. and while go thru campaing you slowly progressed ..and in the end you could comand whole **** DIVISION..with ALL units..from HQ Arty..truck horses..to inf..tanks and so on..
nobody of course expect them idiots to do that..but just make game that makes sense..
IF youre going for large scale strategy.. make units appropriety to this scale.. morons.
I wont even mention mechanics of that game..its simple as hell...
Score = 1...i think its too much ..cause they coopy game.. and **** it up.. but hey they did something.
LORDZ GAMES STUDIO.. are idiots and beware of their games.… Expand
Average User Score: 8.2Jan 21, 2014Being fan of strategy games..and Close Combat series I was happy to hear about this game.
It goes towards realism pretty hard..you neverBeing fan of strategy games..and Close Combat series I was happy to hear about this game.
It goes towards realism pretty hard..you never seen before. But it croses line where its actually any fun to play it or to undersand it.
Game is done is such not intuitive way that i think it son purpose..
For example deployment mode: germans - red color, russina - blue ? WHY THE HELL?
Game is very complicated..and im mean VERY.. menu is awfaul looking ..and not intuitive at all.
It would be really great game with bigger dev. team and budget..but for now its unplayable.… Expand
Average User Score: 8.1Jan 11, 2014I bought this game in beta so i'm playing this game from beginning.
Its finally something different from those nonsense games like MoW andI bought this game in beta so i'm playing this game from beginning.
Its finally something different from those nonsense games like MoW and CoH where you shoot to each other from 20-40 meters apart. Here you have grand scale strategy . Where tanks engage each other from 2km+ , you can call in airstrikes you can do airborne cavalry assaults. Not parachute drops.
Many nations , too many if you ask me, and loads of different units.
This game goes into more realistic theme..you need to refuel,rearm.. your tanks can get stuck into mud or loose tracks.. etc etc
You can created modify your own battle groups which is really cool..tweaking and perfecting will take you hours... More inf? no problem.. heavy on tanks and support vehicles? here you go..do what you want.
This is game heavily depends on team play, micromanagement of your units is here really important and you need to be focused on it all the time..so if you play 4v4 and suddenly you have troll/kid/temakiller on your team..you can do anything about it, you cant vote kcik him, cause there is no such option, you can only watch how he throws down the game.
Well you might said that devs didn't knew that multi games are full of trolls and kids. Its 2nd game of the series. So either they are stupid, they didn't care or they didn't had time to do this.
Now you have friends list.. but there is no Black List, so you have to remember who you don't want to play with. Its annoying that simple thing like that wasn't in the game. Again devs didn't played multi game before?
They wont even ban anybody on privet hosted games, only on official servers, OK so give us black list!!
I had to surrender dont know how many games cause of people who wouldn't cooperate or team killed..or were plain stupid.
Another thing menu is full of useless animation showing parts of game? what for?
.. how about putting map of game you about to play?
How about availability to see what kind of deck people have? So if we see "support" only person we can kick him before game start in lobby?
How about making game with 4-5 countries but units and maps worked to the perfection?
I dont know how hard is to add another level of game? with big turn base mode like close combat 4..where your units div/reg/bat are moved and when they meet with enemy they get to fight ?
there is such thing in single , but its very simplistic. I guess they have to rediscover that idea.
This game started with great idea, but it was dumbed down, somebody tought if we put X more countries X more people will buy it, and we give them billion units ! everything to sell more!.. still its finally something different from the pack. Fells like 2 teams were working on it, one who wanted to make good game, and one who wanted to make more money, second one won.
I play this game almost every day, and i give it 4, why? its 2nd game of the series with no major improvements except adding planes upgrading graphics . Basic logical things like i mentioned before are still mystery to Eugene devs.. why?… Expand