Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

10,000 B.C.

EMAILPRINTWarner Bros. Pictures

10,000 B.C. reviews
34
4.8 User Score:

Generally unfavorable reviews

Based on 29 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 168 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Adventure  |  Drama

Written by: Roland Emmerich
Harald Kloser

Directed by: Roland Emmerich

Release Date:
Theatrical: March 7, 2008
DVD: June 24, 2008

Running Time: 109 minutes, Color

Origin: USA / New Zealand

Summary

RATING: PG-13 for sequences of intense action and violence

Starring Steven Strait, Cliff Curtis, Camilla Belle, Tim Barlow, Marco Khan, Reece Ritchie, Mo Zinal, and Omar Sharif

In a remote mountain tribe, the young hunter D'Leh has found his heart's passion: the beautiful Evolet. But when a band of mysterious warlords raid his village and kidnap Evolet, D'Leh leads a small group of hunters to pursue the warlords to the end of the world to save her. As they venture into unknown lands for the first time, the group discovers there are civilizations beyond their own and that humankind's reach is far greater than they ever knew. At each encounter, the group is joined by other tribes who have been attacked by the slave raiders, which turns D'Leh's once-small band into an army. Driven by destiny, the unlikely warriors must battle prehistoric predators while braving the harshest elements. At their heroic journey's end, they uncover a lost civilization and learn their ultimate fate lies in an empire beyond imagination, where great pyramids reach into the skies. Here they will take their stand against a tyrannical god who has brutally enslaved their own. And it is here that D'Leh finally comes to understand that he has been called to save not only Evolet but all of civilization. (Warner Bros.)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

75

Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips

Emmerich has no time for poetry or magic, even when the director and his digital wizards (here doing wildly variable work) are trying to dazzle. He’s a taskmaster and a field marshall, not a visionary. But I enjoyed 10,000 B.C. more and more, and more than just about anything Emmerich’s done before.

Read Full Review >
70

The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt

As one might expect, there are campy moments and far too much reliance on God-like interventions in the affairs of early man. Less expected is that 10,000 BC works just fine as an action Western with handsome actors in striking costumes and a few CG predators, which are giddy fun.

Read Full Review >
70

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

10,000 BC is as crazy as it wants to be, plundering the past and other movies with that peculiar Hollywood combination of the earnest and the preposterous that can result in the guiltiest of guilty pleasures.

Read Full Review >
63

TV Guide Ken Fox

Too dumb to take seriously, but just silly enough to be sort of fun.

Read Full Review >
60

Empire Angie Errigo

The mammoths aren’t all that is wild and woolly in this innocent, old-fashioned, amusingly self-important, entertainingly mad, rip-snorting throwback to vintage Saturday matinee fare, with all the swell set piece thrills state-of-the-art technology can throw at it.

Read Full Review >
50

LA Weekly Luke Y. Thompson

Director Roland Emmerich (Godzilla, Independence Day) knows his money shots: any time he throws some mastodons or giant dodos on the screen for a little beast-battlin’ action, he has our attention. But his lack of skill with actors really shows during the long moments of downtime in-between.

Read Full Review >
50

The New York Times A.O. Scott

The big, climactic fight, complete with an epic snuffleupagus rampage, is decent action-movie fun. And as a history lesson, 10,000 BC has its value. It explains just how we came to be the tolerant, peace-loving farmers we are today, and why the pyramids were never finished.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer

This is the kind of movie where a character can't just say "the fire's not out yet," they have to say "the fire still lives in these stones." It made me yearn to see "Caveman" again. At least that was INTENTIONALLY funny.

Read Full Review >
50

Miami Herald Connie Ogle

Essentially a rip-off of "Apocalypto" for audience members too young or squeamish to endure graphic human sacrifice and jaguar face-eating.

Read Full Review >
42

The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps

"The Day After Tomorrow" was kind of stupidly fun, and 10,000 B.C. might be too, if it weren't so stupidly dull.

Read Full Review >
40

Variety Todd McCarthy

Conventional where it should be bold and mild where it should be wild, 10,000 BC reps a missed opportunity to present an imaginative vision of a prehistoric moment.

Read Full Review >
40

Film Threat Felix Vasques Jr.

What chaps my hide more is that I've seen 10,000 BC. I've seen it three times in the last year and a half. Except in the one that I saw, it centered instead on Mayans, was mostly historically accurate, and was called "Apocalypto."

Read Full Review >
38

Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey

Tedious, ludicrous and harmless glimpse of the dawn of civilization.

Read Full Review >
38

Premiere Ryan Stewart

A nonsensical vision of pre-history that lurches randomly between "caveman vs. jungle beast" encounters -- Roland Emmerich's Shlockalypto -- and a rococo Stargate spin-off involving pyramids, slave uprisings and oracles.

Read Full Review >
38

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey

If you thought "300" was silly, think of 10,000 BC as 33.333 times sillier.

Read Full Review >
38

USA Today Claudia Puig

Within a few minutes into the ponderous prehistoric pseudo-epic that is 10,000 B.C., you find yourself longing for George of the Jungle to crash into a tree or the Geico cavemen to amble up and put an end to the droning seriousness of this tedious tale.

Read Full Review >
38

ReelViews James Berardinelli

One doesn't expect intelligent scripting or deep characterization from Roland Emmerich, but the film's lack of energy, poor special effects, and monotonous pacing lead to an inescapable conclusion: 10,000 B.C. isn't only brain-dead, it's COMPLETELY dead. It's inert and without a heartbeat.

Read Full Review >
33

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

It's as if all the digital tools of new millennial filmmaking fell into the hands of men who had less storytelling sense than a campfire bard or a cave painter.

Read Full Review >
30

Chicago Reader Andrea Gronvall

Overblown and stupefyingly dull.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Ann Hornaday

One part Joseph Campbell hero quest, one part multi-culti morality tale, one part live-action "Flintstones" cartoon, 10,000 B.C. is finally every part just plain nuts, from a hike featuring more ecosystems than an Al Gore documentary to a wacky climax set amid pyramids that -- you'll e-mail me if I'm wrong -- wouldn't have been built for another 7,000 years or so.

Read Full Review >
30

Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek

The picture, despite the grand panoramic scale Emmerich has tried to give it, is dopey and static. Its finest moments belong to the thundering herd of woolly mammoths who storm through the picture sometime in its first half-hour.

Read Full Review >
25

San Francisco Chronicle Peter Hartlaub

Completely ridiculous, but fun to look at.

Read Full Review >
25

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Call it "Apocalypto" for pussies -- a PG-13 rating, puh-leese! -- or prehistory for peabrains. Just don’t call it friendo. 10,000 B.C. will take your money, rob your time and hit your brain like a shot of Novacaine.

Read Full Review >
25

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

Neither grand enough to be impressive nor antic enough to be charming, the movie settles for bland and frantic, climaxing in a showdown among decadent pyramid builders. How bad are these guys? They're sadists...and, wink wink, sissies.

Read Full Review >
25

Boston Globe Ty Burr

So, yea, it is a stinker. But it is prophesied that in six months time you shall come across 10,000 B.C.’ in the land of Pay-Per-View. And you shall say: ‘‘Pass the popcorn.’’

Read Full Review >
25

New York Daily News Joe Neumaier

10,000 B.C. tries, but never catches fire.

Read Full Review >
25

New York Post Lou Lumenick

I was kind of rough on "Apocalypto," which in retrospect seems like a minor classic compared to 10,000 BC.

Read Full Review >
20

Slate Dana Stevens

In terms of character development, wit, and simple curiosity, it's dumber than a Neanderthal.

Read Full Review >
0

Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov

The only evolution in question here is that of Emmerich's skills as a director of motion pictures.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 4.8 (out of 10) based on 168 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

SJT gave it a0:
Usually I don't review movies, but just games. However, I lately bought this movie because some friends and my father hyped me, but it was totally not worth the money, at all. I can put it in two ways, first of all I can explain how it has so many things that they definitely didn't have that time, secondly I can express how common the overall story is. The first one is simple, piramids, clear speech through tribes, boats, metal cages, pieces of cloth like that.. headband (this is different from the animal skin also seen in the movie). Sure, it can actually be that they tried to go from a point of view where there was a civilisation before, yet the fact is that it's very unlikely, if that were the case they should've went even further back into time, if you get my point. Even if you look past that, the story of a man falling in love with a lady and wanting her back, name me a damn movie where that isn't actually a sub-plot?! Seriously, movies these days aren't often trying to stand out anymore, but just trying to tell a story like we have seen so many times before in a different setting, in this case one that mixes up time periods. I am not hating, I simply didn't enjoy it and also expected quite something more serious about that time period. It didn't deliver this expectation to me at all, so I am going to have to consider this as an extremely bad movie and award a 0, which I seriously think it deserves.

Lauren s gave it a4:
The movie had okay special effects, but forget about that. The movie itself is just so unbalanced, it really should have been a documentary on National Geographic. Plus, from another view point it's really about these two "villages" fighting, and of course, d'lay (the main charactor) really likes this girl (Camille Biel) who is called by the anicent mother [Spritual Leader/healer???) the blued eyed girl who will bring "hope". But, of course, the predictable 'knights' come and take away most of the tribe's people. [sorry,i forgot their name] so than 3 men, including D'ley must travel to find their people and bring them back... however most of the knight have either murdered most of them (at their tribe) or are now slaves. So the predictable thing happens, they are transfered to this Temple City (across a very deadly desert, oh my) and finally, god forbid, D'ley kills the emper, and gets the girl, but the anicent mother dies. Yeah, no matter how close i paid attention, the movie just is boring, despite the action. BORING. SNOOZzzzzzzz.

Hinuera s gave it a1:
Potentially a good movie for the under 12's otherwise insulting. Big budget low intelligence.

Richard L gave it a7:
As a world history teacher, I realize this film is bubble gum for your brain. But to the average sixth grader, whom I teach, it's probably a visual scavenger hunt: hunter-gatherers, domesticators and cultivators, mammoths, sabre-tooths, raw meat, pyramids, boats, nomads in animal skins, villagers in cloth... I mean, come on, a realistic story about 10,000 B.C. would be as bad as mammoth's breath. Lighten up!

Charlotte P gave it a10:
Any one who has bad things to say about this movie has missed to point completly! stop reading into things so much. just enjoy a movie dont try to find its faults. the story line was insane, but it was a fun movie that didn't need a lot of thought! very enjoyable.

Sally B. gave it a10:
Amazing video... Amazing acting... a real classic in the mind of a normal person!

Katherine P. gave it a10:
This is the most amazing movie I've ever seen. The special effects were very realistic!!!

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use