CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

28 Days Later...
Fox Searchlight Pictures

28 Days Later... reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 73 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
7.0 out of 10
based on 39 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 151 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for strong violence and gore, language and nudity

Starring Alex Palmer, Bindu De Stoppani, Jukka Hiltunen, David Schneider, Cillian Murphy, Toby Sedgwick, Naomie Harris, and Noah Huntley

When a group of animal rights activists frees primates from a research facility, a deadly virus which causes murderous behavior is unleashed.


GENRE(S): Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Alex Garland  
DIRECTED BY: Danny Boyle  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: October 21, 2003 
Video: October 21, 2003 
Theatrical: June 27, 2003 
RUNNING TIME: 112 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: Netherlands / UK / USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

90
Slate David Edelstein
This is finally the zombie flick as cautionary political tale, and as humanist parable. It's not the flesh-gouging zombie we have to worry about, the filmmakers suggest, but the soul-gouging zombie within.
Read Full Review
90
New York Magazine Peter Rainer
A first-rate zombie movie. The best tribute I can offer is that it makes you want to go out directly afterward and down some expensive single-malt scotch.
Read Full Review
90
Los Angeles Times Manohla Dargis
At once an old-fashioned freakout and an environmental cautionary tale (mess with Mother Nature and she'll mess with you right back), the film combines two genre standbys -- lethal contagion and the undead -- and gives them a wicked, contemporary spin.
Read Full Review
90
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Rarely has so scary a thriller been so well made, and never has digital video -- by the English cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle -- been put to grittier use.
88
Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach
It's a zombie flick that moves -- no stumbling, staggering living dead here -- in an atmosphere that feels like a Gothic docudrama, and it's freaky beyond all reason.
Read Full Review
88
Premiere Glenn Kenny
The genuine article, a hard-core horror picture from start to finish... Prepare to get seriously stresed.
Read Full Review
88
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
But this smart, genuinely creepy movie also feels real, which is why its horrors hit so hard. Fans of the scary stuff, run, don't walk.
Read Full Review
88
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
It's “The Wizard of Oz” with a viral infection.
Read Full Review
88
New York Post Megan Lehmann
In place of elaborate sets, clever filmmaking gives the impression of a central London emptied of people and cars, to eerie effect - and this opening reel is nothing short of magnificent.
Read Full Review
88
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland plumb the violence of the mind with slashing wit and shocking gravity. Happy nightmares.
Read Full Review
83
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
Cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle, a veteran of low-tech Dogme films, work wonders with a digital camera, pausing to take in the beauty of the countryside or an eerily empty London…It's virtuosic without ever quite being showy.
Read Full Review
83
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
A swankily austere piece of jeepers-creepers sci-fi.
Read Full Review
80
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Fresh and edgy; the images of a wasted London and the details of a paramilitary organization in the countryside are both creepy and persuasive.
Read Full Review
80
Dallas Observer Luke Y. Thompson
The deep thematic concerns are never fully developed, but the characters are, and the story compels. Also, the movie's pretty scary.
Read Full Review
80
Time Richard Corliss
Boyle's ingenuity with the camera gives this fraught journey plenty of menace and pizazz.
Read Full Review
80
LA Weekly John Powers
The movie is mercifully uncontaminated by the smarty-pants self-reflexiveness that has sucked the lifeblood from nearly all post-"Scream" horror pictures. Clever enough not to be too clever, Boyle and Garland play their story straight -- they just want to give you the creeps -- and, by so doing, bring the undead back to cinematic life.
Read Full Review
80
The New York Times Dana Stevens
Mr. Boyle has hardly lost his sly, provocative perversity or his ear for the rhythms of unchecked violence, but he does seem to be maturing. It's as if, in contemplating the annihilation of the human race, he has discovered his inner humanist.
Read Full Review
80
Village Voice Michael Atkinson
On one hand a seat-o'-pants digital-video quickie designed for blunt trauma, and on the other a veritable index of classic genre-stuff, Boyle's film creates an acute sense of movie-viewing danger.
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones
There’s gore, all right, although the real terror lies in the tease, and the often dark, herky-jerky DV format ratchets up the tension to an almost unbearable degree.
Read Full Review
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Around about the third act, the picture does what no self-respecting virus ever would -- relents, turns confused, and lets our immune system fight back with thoughts of its own, with distracting cavils about the logic of the plot and the slightness of the themes.
Read Full Review
75
USA Today Claudia Puig
The look of the film, shot on digital video, is haunting and gritty. The cleaner, prettier look of 35mm would have detracted from the immediacy and sense of foreboding created in this artful blend of sci-fi and pseudo-realism.
Read Full Review
75
Boston Globe Ty Burr
A damn-near great end-of-the-world zombie movie, terrifying on the basic heebie-jeebie level, respectful toward its B-movie forebears, and all the more unnerving for coming out in this fretful era of SARS and germ warfare.
Read Full Review
75
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
Boyle gives us some truly harrowing sequences and a succession of images that stick in the mind like a bad dream.
Read Full Review
75
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Solid performances, an intelligent script, and sure-handed direction. The result is a movie that kept me involved from start to finish.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
A tough, smart, ingenious movie that leads its characters into situations where everything depends on their (and our) understanding of human nature.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
By the finish, the movie is getting by on little but adrenaline and audience goodwill. Still, that goodwill runs fairly deep, because, taken all in all, 28 Days Later is a superior motion picture.
Read Full Review
75
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
It's not a pretty picture, but it won't be soon forgotten by thriller fans with nerves and stomachs steely enough to take its violence in stride.
Read Full Review
70
Film Threat Rick Kisonak
Manages to be impressively unsettling given the flaws in its foundation.
Read Full Review
70
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Heir to a long tradition of apocalyptic scare stories, the film wears its influences proudly.
Read Full Review
70
Variety Derek Elley
Shows a rather arrogant disdain for its audience in between occasional flashes of flair.
Read Full Review
70
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
It's undoubtedly a canny and clever twist on the standard zombie-attack yarn, but anybody who's making grand claims for 28 Days Later simply hasn't seen enough horror movies.
Read Full Review
63
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
[Boyle] shrugs off any intellectual pretense to rollick in a dead-on scare fest. On that level, 28 Days Later is indeed a frightfully good time.
Read Full Review
63
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
I think Garland and Boyle just want to make our flesh creep by showing someone else's flesh decaying. If that's their aim, they achieved it.
Read Full Review
60
Film Threat Rich Cline
Director Danny Boyle ("Trainspotting") has a terrific eye, so the film as a whole is very well directed, with clever camera work that builds the tension and actually jolts us out of our seats a few times.
Read Full Review
60
The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
Like his makeshift societies, Garland's tantalizing set-ups tend to unravel in unsatisfying ways.
Read Full Review
50
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Creepy and truly suspenseful in some places, unintentionally comic or plain awful in others.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Boyle's new movie is mostly a zombie fiasco, closer to the vacuities of "The Beach" than the scintillating social satire of "Trainspotting."
Read Full Review
50
The New Yorker Anthony Lane
There are two drawbacks here. One is a shortage of superior zombies, although where one goes to rent extra zombies I have no idea...Second, we have a serious shortage of fright. [30 June 2003, p. 102]
30
Washington Post Ann Hornaday
Unrelentingly grim, unremittingly gross and unforgivably unattractive, 28 Days Later is an orgy of troubling images and bestial sound effects.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 7.0 (out of 10) based on 151 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Faisal H. gave it an8:
A new take on the zombie genre, and a very successful one. 28 Days Later is a great movie, from its unique storyline, beautiful camera-angles, and well-written characters, the film's greatest strength is the fact that the characters involved are so human, unlike the superhero characters you might have seen in other movies like Resident Evil, these characters behave in ways we would have in situations like these, so it is easy to attach to them. The only flaw in the film is that it loses some of it's strengths in the second half for a while, but that can easily be overlooked considering what a quality product 28 Days Later is. Recommended for any horror movie fan who wants to see something different than the usual shoot-em-up.

John gave it a10:
I really loved this movie. Finally a movie with ass-kickingly fast zombies. But i see a lot of zero's up here and as I read i got the impression that most of those people didnt understand the movie so im gonna try to help some of the points the complained about. 1) Now the reason there is light in the supermarket is because if you look really closely you will find its not actually a ceiling, ok, its just one big hole. I bet u missed that. 2) They aren't zombies they are pissed off because its not really a "virus" its more like people are transferring periods to each other. 3) The reason they dont attack other infected is because once you get bit...well...i uhhhhh...yea...4) The army fellows didn't want to get with the little girl as a cure, but just to rebuild the entire human race with 9 guys ad 2 girls. So you see once you fully understand the movie, you'll love it that much more.

Matt McLovin gave it a10:
Awesomely made. 28 Days Later kicked major ass with a kick ass ending. Greatest infected person movie. Blows away the 2nd.

Nick A. gave it a9:
Shocking realism and some of the genre's most horrifying shots in recent years are captured perfectly by Boyle, who succeeds in creating genuine fear from the base of one of humanity's most elemental anxieties -- that which can tear a city such as London to the bare; the fear of an unknown viral pandemic. Released when it was, Boyle's already horror classic tackled this global nightmare precisely when it was to be most effective; as SARS was striking on high abroad and America was on alert to prevent any cases of its own. '28 Days Later' is unrelenting horror cinema that first stunned England, and then created an epidemic of fear in the States. This film is quite possibly the most intellectually ripe “horror” film of all-time and is surely not to be missed!

Abby l gave it an8:
This movie had an overall good plot and a good cast, some parts to me were unreal, and other parts were filled with unneeded gore. But overall this movie was very satisfying.

Rich S. gave it a0:
One of the worst movies I've ever seen. I'll always remember how bad it was because I was laughing the whole way through.

R D. gave it an8:
Very good zombie movie. Scary in parts and has a good social commentary.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: World News | Fantasy Football | Amy Winehouse | Baseball | E3 | Batman | Firefox 3 | iPhone 3G

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use