CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Against All Odds
Columbia Pictures

Against All Odds reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 42 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
N/A out of 10
based on 10 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 0 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R

Starring Rachel Ward, Jeff Bridges, James Woods, Alex Karras, and Jane Greer

Terry Brogan (Bridges), a football player who is fired from the team, is recruited by an old friend (Woods) to track down a girlfriend in Mexico.


GENRE(S): Action  |  Drama  |  Noir  |  Romance  |  Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Eric Hughes
Daniel Mainwaring (1947 screenplays)
 
DIRECTED BY: Taylor Hackford  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: December 14, 1999 
Theatrical: March 2, 1984 
RUNNING TIME: 128 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

Oscar and Golden Globe nominations for Original Song [Phil Collins - "Against All Odds (Take a Look at Me Now)"]. Grammy nominated for Best Album of Instrumental Score Written for a Motion Picture or Television Special.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

80
The New York Times Janet Maslin
Against All Odds is so lively and enjoyable on its own terms that its genre problems, while real, are easily overlooked. Mr. Hackford's brand of glossy, romantic escapism doesn't have to work as an homage. It has a vitality of its own.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
There is a lot of plot in this movie - probably too much. The best thing to do is to accept the plot, and then disregard it, and pay attention to the scenes of passion. They really work.
Read Full Review
70
Variety Staff (Not Credited)
If not for a somewhat murky and misanthropic ending, Against All Odds would stand as a well-engineered second-try at 1947's "Out of the Past."
Read Full Review
50
Boston Globe Jay Carr
It begins promisingly.... But the film has no center, succumbs to drift, and gets away from Hackford. [03 Mar 1984]
40
Wall Street Journal Julie Salamon
The story wanders unconvincingly and tediously into corporate law offices and big, splashy nightclubs. Still, Mr. Hackford has the documentary maker's eye for realistic detail, so it all looks right. [01 Mar 1984]
40
Empire Ian Nathan
This is about as noir as Pete’s Dragon, best to accept its superficiality as a boon - Hackford, at least, gives it a slick exterior - and enjoy it is a vacuous thriller and extended Phil Collins video.
Read Full Review
30
Chicago Reader Dave Kehr
Little remains of the original but its weakest element - its overelaborate intrigue - and Hackford seems only to scramble it further.
Read Full Review
25
TV Guide Staff (Not Credited)
Not even a bravura performance from Woods, some steamy love scenes between Bridges and Ward, and a thrilling daylight car chase down Sunset Boulevard can pull this confusing remake out of the doldrums.
Read Full Review
25
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
The film is a howler of illogical, overwrought emotion, inexplicable actions and sudden bursts of bloody violence. [03 Mar 1984]
20
Time Richard Schickel
The result is a flat, dumbly brutal movie, full of overplotted complexity and empty of all emotional resonance, except that provided by the presence of Jane Greer (the original film's dark lady, here doing a supporting role) and Richard Widmark.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 0.0 (out of 10) based on 0 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | iPhone 3G | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use