|
Upcoming Release Calendar
34
10,000 B.C. Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
A.I. Artificial Intelligence
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
MPAA RATING: PG-13 for some sexual content and violent images
Starring Haley Joel Osment, Jude Law, Frances O'Connor, Sam Robards, and William Hurt
Started by Stanley Kubrick and finished by Spielberg, this project was adapted from Brian Aldiss's 1966 short story "Super-Toys Last All Summer Long." The film explores the idea of programming a child robot so that he is able to love.
| GENRE(S): | Sci-fi |
| WRITTEN BY: |
Steven Spielberg
Ian Watson (screen story) Brian Aldiss (short story Supertoys Last All Summer Long) |
| DIRECTED BY: | Steven Spielberg |
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: March 5, 2002 Video: March 5, 2002 Theatrical: June 29, 2001 |
| RUNNING TIME: | 140 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: | USA |
Earned two Golden Globe nominations, including one for director Spielberg.
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
The average user rating for this movie is 5.5 (out of 10) based on 194 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Sean P. gave it a9:
This film is one of my largest personal enigmas. I usually, almost always, find myself agreeing with the critics, and consequently, I use this site constantly and love it to death. But, there are 4 films that have gotten mixed metacritic scores which I totally cannot be without: Fight Club, Requiem for a Dream, The New World, and this one. And it's very weird indeed. I recognize that this movie is very far from perfect, is very meandering and self-indulgent and weird and incoherent, and yet while I am actually watching it, my eyes can't leave the freaking screen. It's just one of those very imperfect but very vivid and addicting pieces of art. Much of this film, especially the ending, feels much like a dream, maybe because dreams are also meandering and hazy and incoherent, but dreaming is still essential and likable. Much like this.
Shane S. gave it a10:
I'm a bit surprised, actually, by all the negative ratings this film has gotten. I disagree, though, because this film is great with three things. [***SPOILERS***] It pushes the imagination in a very uncomfortable way. That is, it actually distorts the modern happy ending and hands it an undertone of depressing creepiness, and it does it for a good reason. It speaks volumes of whether or not love is an exclusively human thing. And lastly, it's a subtle examination of modern evolutionary theory, expecting in its efforts to say "humans' time will eventually end on this planet." The ending scene is necessary for that reason, and without it the film would not really have a point. With these long endings, though, where the first fade-out tricks you into believing it actually ends at a certain point, people get a little angry and flabberghasted that they didn't get to leave the theatres that much earlier.
Manveer R. gave it a6:
Palin average one speilbergs half hearted efforts good visuals and not bad acting but movie dragged on way too long it was pathetic.
[Anonymous] gave it a4:
Despite its Spielberg gloss and philosophical pretensions, the movie lacks either a true emotional or intellectual heart and is full of inconsistencies. (For example -- a spoiler -- New York is inundated by water from melted icecaps but at the end when they have refrozen it is then under ice (?!).) To my mind it's more dross trading on uncritical reviewers and dismissive of its audience -- a view it ironically takes right from its redundant title "A.I.: Artificial Intelligence."
S. Gold gave it a1:
This movie is a bad creepy, boring, overlong, pointless, and weird among other things avoid if you can. Spielberg's worst!
Mike G. gave it a9:
I was blown away by the way this movie was conceived and realized. The best movies about the future are really movies that look at the present and where we're heading, and this movie did that with aplomb, as it never stopped questioning the relationships between robots and humanity, and the "rights" of the AI. Meanwhile, within all this, was a very touching and exciting movie. I still give Speilberg more credit for this movie than Kubrick, and think that Speilberg kept in a superb mix of dark and light, making this movie as captivating as it was.
Nick H gave it a7:
Very much an imperfect movie, but it's one that doesn't leave you disappointed. The driving force behind this movie - which is, of course, Kubrick's genius - shines through the muck of a flawed production. Kubrick's dark, dreary nature has sadly been exchanged for a lighter tone, "Speilberg-ian happiness" if you will. Yes Kubrick wrote it, but it seems to be delivered to us in a family friendly nature, one with a thick coating of joy smeared across the original sadness. One has to wonder, if Kubrick were still alive would this movie be darker, creepier, more unusual and even more logical? Would he have made it completely his own or would he have worked in unison with Speilberg? We'll never know, but in the meantime, watch this movie again. Give it another chance. RATING: *** / ****

| Return to top of page |

Popular on CBS sites: World News | Fantasy Football | Amy Winehouse | Baseball | E3 | Batman | Firefox 3 | iPhone 3G
About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise
© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use