|
Upcoming Release Calendar
48
21 Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
Apocalypse Now Redux
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
MPAA RATING: R for disturbing violent images, language, sexual content and some drug use
Starring Marlon Brando, Robert Duvall, Martin Sheen, Dennis Hopper, and Laurence Fishburne
A new, expanded version of Francis Ford Coppola's 1979 Vietnam war epic.
| GENRE(S): | War |
| WRITTEN BY: |
John Milius
Francis Ford Coppola Joseph Conrad (novel Heart of Darkness) |
| DIRECTED BY: | Francis Ford Coppola |
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: November 20, 2001 Video: November 20, 2001 Theatrical: August 3, 2001 |
| RUNNING TIME: | 196 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: | USA |
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
The average user rating for this movie is 8.7 (out of 10) based on 48 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Iban L gave it a5:
There are really good things in this film. It is really original, and I love the way it reaches such an spiritual atmosphere without ever losing the sense of reality. Nevertheless, this long version of the film is terribly slow and boring. I kind of lose interest very early.
Felix K. gave it a10:
What is left to say ? Nothing, I think. It's the best war movie ever, so that it belongs to the 10 best pictures of all time. Everybody who has never seen this one has missed a piece of culture !!!
Doyle H. gave it a10:
I was only disappointed that the movie ended. I could have watched hours more. The added scenes were all outstanding especially the additional Kilgore material. Even more than Platoon, it sums up my own Vietnam experience. Now where's Hearts of Darkness?
Andy K. gave it a10:
Reminds us that cinema can truly be literary. A masterwork made much better!
Matt C. gave it a10:
A perfect ten. One of the greatest movies of all time is now longer and even more surreal. I can see why many people would find the original to be better, but I think this gives us more of what was already great.
Christian W. gave it a5:
The original balanced all the elements out nicely to make a terrifying, disturbing and utterly brilliant film. The redux version messes up this fragile balance by adding too much uninteresting new material that ruins the pace of the movie completly. I was particularly disappointed with the playboy bunny reprise- sheen and co are supposed to be in hell..there are no obliging playboy bunnies in hell. And the French colonists scene was so boring- it served no purpose. I fear this version has almost ruined the original for me!
Brendan M. gave it an8:
I'd love to say this movie is great. I really would. The message that is trying to be delivered is valient, and I applaude Coppola for his efforts. And the explosions. Oh the explosions. The action is AMAZING. I loved it. But there is a reason this movie doesnt get a 9, or even a 10. The sheer weird factor. I know thats part of the whole Apocalypse Now vibe, but this movie is surreal to the point of annoyence. A rent. Just watch it, and be disturbed.

| Return to top of page |

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | iPhone 3G | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL
About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise
© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use