DVD
Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Recent DVD/Video Releases
58
Adam Resurrected
65
Adoration
42
Aliens in the Attic
56
American Violet
44
Answer Man, The
82
Anvil! The Story of Anvil![]()
58
Away We Go
54
Battle for Terra
55
Casi Divas
63
Cheri
83
Drag Me to Hell![]()
76
Every Little Step
70
Fados
26
Filth and Wisdom
80
Food, Inc.
34
Ghosts of Girlfriends Past
67
Girlfriend Experience, The
32
I Love You, Beth Cooper
50
Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs
81
Il Divo![]()
32
Land of the Lost
74
Lemon Tree
43
Love 'N Dancing
64
Lymelife
50
Management
63
Medicine for Melancholy
56
Monsters vs. Aliens
34
My Life in Ruins
48
Not Forgotten
76
Not Quite Hollywood: The Wild, Untold Story of Ozploitation!
50
Nothing Like the Holidays
26
Objective, The
54
Observe and Report
78
O'Horten
42
Orphan
48
Proposal, The
40
Shrink
55
Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, The
35
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
88
Tulpan![]()
66
Unmistaken Child
45
Whatever Works
34
Year One
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Batman Forever

Mixed or average reviews
Based on 23 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 15 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Action | Crime | Fantasy | Suspense/Thriller
Written by:
Lee Batchler (also story)
Janet Scott Batchler (also story)
Akiva Goldsman
Bob Kane (characters)
Directed by: Joel Schumacher
Release Date:
Theatrical: June 16, 1995
DVD: October 18, 2005
Running Time: 122 minutes, Color
Origin: USA
Summary
RATING: PG-13 for strong stylized action
Starring Val Kilmer, Tommy Lee Jones, Jim Carrey, Nicole Kidman, Chris O'Donnell, Michael Gough, Drew Barrymore, and Debi Mazar
Directed by Joel Schumacher, this is the third film in Warner Bros.' Batman series.
Also On Metacritic
FILM: Batman & Robin Falling Down
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database Official Studio Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Dallas Observer Matt Zoller Seitz
Unlike Burton, Schumacher doesn't let his stylistic and thematic fascinations run away with him; he keeps one hand on the wheel at all times. The result isn't as emotionally daring and visually outrageous as Burton at his best, but it's better paced and more consistently entertaining from one sequence to the next.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Although the film's frenetic rhythm is reminiscent of an "Indiana Jones" picture, visually Schumacher directs it like a musical, turning each image into eye candy, weaving one lush set piece into the next, as if he were the Vincente Minnelli of blockbusters.
Read Full Review >ReelViews James Berardinelli
It's lighter, brighter, funnier, faster-paced, and a whole lot more colorful than before.
Read Full Review >Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Schumacher's method is to use a lighter touch, to stay closer to the cartoon that Bob Kane created for DC Comics in 1939 and to temper Burton's nightmare world with an accessible, brightly colored TV palette.
Read Full Review >San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
It's an art-direction, Dolby-sound, special-effects extravaganza, a grand-scale effort that's more awe-inspiring than completely successful as entertainment.
Read Full Review >Film Threat Clint Morris
If the first two "Batman" movies (1989/1992) were the storm, then Batman Forever (1995) is the rainbow at the end of it. After seeing so much dark and doom, it’s also refreshing to see some beaming color.
Read Full Review >Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Working as much like a circus ringmaster as a director, Joel Schumacher has brought several critical qualities to the mix, starting with much more of a pop culture sensibility and a sense of fun than Tim Burton, who directed the first two pictures, and he has a stylish visual sensibility as well.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Staff(not credited)
At best, Batman Forever is mildly diverting, brainless fun that feels like a long trailer for a better film.
Read Full Review >USA Today Susan Wloszczyna
With an ace pop mechanic like Joel Schumacher now in charge of our hero's bruised psyche, the patient not only survives but thrives in the garishly garnished but never groaningly gruesome Batman Forever. [16 Jun 1995, Pg.01.D]
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
There is no rhythm to the movie, no ebb and flow; it's all flat-out spectacle.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Desson Thomson
Carrey lights up an otherwise over-scripted, over-frenetic potboiler.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Hal Hinson
Sometimes thrilling, but rarely inspired, it is thoroughly-almost perfectly-adequate.
Read Full Review >Variety Brian Lowry
Yet while Schumacher has largely accomplished the goal of delivering a cinematic comic book, he's also left the movie hollow at its core -- a distinction that may not trouble Saturday-night audiences but that nonetheless dulls the film's impact beyond its sheer and unrelenting visual grandeur.
Read Full Review >Newsweek Jack Kroll
The movie does have somewhat more lilt and levity, much of it due to Jim Carrey as the Riddler. But there's still plenty of murk, physical and metaphysical, and more psychobabble about Bruce Wayne's obsessions and repressions.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Alas, Schumacher doesn't ride on the momentum; worse, he's not an action director, and the film grinds to a dead stop every time it tries to speed up.
Read Full Review >The New York Times Elvis Mitchell
As for the actual movie, it's the empty-calorie equivalent of a Happy Meal (another Batman tie-in), so clearly a product that the question of its cinematic merit is strictly an afterthought.
Read Full Review >San Francisco Examiner Barbara Shulgasser
Except for the casting, it would be difficult to find any substantial difference between this movie and the previous ones, or this movie and any number of high-tech adventure movies of the last decade.
Read Full Review >Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Directed by Joel Schumacher with occasional gestures toward social commentary, and enough spectacle to mask the movie's deep down emptiness.
Read Full Review >Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Director Joel Schumacher submits to the Wagnerian bombast with an overly busy surface, and the script by Lee and Janet Scott Batchler and Akiva Goldsman basically runs through the formula as if it's a checklist.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
There's so much and so little going on here simultaneously that you're not sure whether to squirm or doze.
Read Full Review >Empire Adam Smith
If you can see beyond the eye-scorching neon and don't mind the desecration of a superhero icon, there's a few crumbs of enjoyment to be had.
Read Full Review >The New Yorker Terrence Rafferty
Schumacher's direction is coarse and slovenly: the picture has the self-conscious jokiness of the "Batman" TV series and the smudged, runny imagery of a cheaply printed comic book.
Read Full Review >Time Richard Corliss
The only thing Schumacher and his scrupulous craftsfolk forgot to give the movie was life -- the energizing spirit of wit and passion that makes scenes work and characters breathe.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 5.3 (out of 10) based on 15 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Dan A gave it a6:
What saves this movie is Tommy Lee Jones and Jim Carrey as Two-Face and The Joker. Jim Carrey is especially in place, while Two-Face's portrayal may be too psychotic, it's not nearly as bad as the Penguin or Mr. Freeze were.
[Anonymous] gave it a7:
A loose, entertaining Batman blockbuster with a great cast. Cool gadgets, but writings gets a little clunky here and there.
Jared C. gave it a10:
Hard Core and Superb.
Dave B. gave it a2:
Not the worst of the bunch, but I wonder what Joel Schumacher was thinking when he took over the franchise. Gotham was never to bright and lively and full of neon in the comic books. And ummmm DZ I think you are reviewing the wrong movie bud.
Travis M. gave it an8:
The most underated of all the Batman films.
DZ gave it a6:
Didn't mean much to my 8 year old mind when it first came out. These days, while it's slightly more watchable, it still fails to excite as much as some people might have you believe. The story is weak, the Prince songs are horrible (the same can't be said for the Elfman score though) and Keaton's rendition as the Dark Knight leaves a lot to the imagination. What I did enjoy about Keaton was his brilliant portrayal of the disturbed Bruce Wayne (one of my favourite scenes was his attempt at letting the cat out of the bag in Vale's apartment). Nicholson is wildly entertaining and his over-the-top antics are worth, at least, a single viewing.
Fred Bob gave it a7:
I like the film but it just didn't have enough of a punch for me.
