GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Batman Forever
Warner Bros.

Batman Forever reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 51 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
5.3 out of 10
based on 23 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 15 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for strong stylized action

Starring Val Kilmer, Tommy Lee Jones, Jim Carrey, Nicole Kidman, Chris O'Donnell, Michael Gough, Drew Barrymore, and Debi Mazar

Directed by Joel Schumacher, this is the third film in Warner Bros.' Batman series.


GENRE(S): Action  |  Crime  |  Fantasy  |  Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Lee Batchler (also story)
Janet Scott Batchler (also story)
Akiva Goldsman
Bob Kane (characters)
 
DIRECTED BY: Joel Schumacher  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: October 18, 2005 
Video: April 14, 1998 
Theatrical: June 16, 1995 
RUNNING TIME: 122 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

80
Dallas Observer Matt Zoller Seitz
Unlike Burton, Schumacher doesn't let his stylistic and thematic fascinations run away with him; he keeps one hand on the wheel at all times. The result isn't as emotionally daring and visually outrageous as Burton at his best, but it's better paced and more consistently entertaining from one sequence to the next.
Read Full Review
75
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Although the film's frenetic rhythm is reminiscent of an "Indiana Jones" picture, visually Schumacher directs it like a musical, turning each image into eye candy, weaving one lush set piece into the next, as if he were the Vincente Minnelli of blockbusters.
Read Full Review
75
ReelViews James Berardinelli
It's lighter, brighter, funnier, faster-paced, and a whole lot more colorful than before.
Read Full Review
75
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Schumacher's method is to use a lighter touch, to stay closer to the cartoon that Bob Kane created for DC Comics in 1939 and to temper Burton's nightmare world with an accessible, brightly colored TV palette.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
It's an art-direction, Dolby-sound, special-effects extravaganza, a grand-scale effort that's more awe-inspiring than completely successful as entertainment.
Read Full Review
70
Film Threat Clint Morris
If the first two "Batman" movies (1989/1992) were the storm, then Batman Forever (1995) is the rainbow at the end of it. After seeing so much dark and doom, it’s also refreshing to see some beaming color.
Read Full Review
70
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Working as much like a circus ringmaster as a director, Joel Schumacher has brought several critical qualities to the mix, starting with much more of a pop culture sensibility and a sense of fun than Tim Burton, who directed the first two pictures, and he has a stylish visual sensibility as well.
Read Full Review
63
TV Guide Staff(not credited)
At best, Batman Forever is mildly diverting, brainless fun that feels like a long trailer for a better film.
Read Full Review
63
USA Today Susan Wloszczyna
With an ace pop mechanic like Joel Schumacher now in charge of our hero's bruised psyche, the patient not only survives but thrives in the garishly garnished but never groaningly gruesome Batman Forever. [16 Jun 1995, Pg.01.D]
63
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
There is no rhythm to the movie, no ebb and flow; it's all flat-out spectacle.
Read Full Review
60
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Carrey lights up an otherwise over-scripted, over-frenetic potboiler.
Read Full Review
60
Washington Post Hal Hinson
Sometimes thrilling, but rarely inspired, it is thoroughly-almost perfectly-adequate.
Read Full Review
60
Variety Brian Lowry
Yet while Schumacher has largely accomplished the goal of delivering a cinematic comic book, he's also left the movie hollow at its core -- a distinction that may not trouble Saturday-night audiences but that nonetheless dulls the film's impact beyond its sheer and unrelenting visual grandeur.
Read Full Review
50
Newsweek Jack Kroll
The movie does have somewhat more lilt and levity, much of it due to Jim Carrey as the Riddler. But there's still plenty of murk, physical and metaphysical, and more psychobabble about Bruce Wayne's obsessions and repressions.
Read Full Review
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Alas, Schumacher doesn't ride on the momentum; worse, he's not an action director, and the film grinds to a dead stop every time it tries to speed up.
Read Full Review
50
The New York Times Elvis Mitchell
As for the actual movie, it's the empty-calorie equivalent of a Happy Meal (another Batman tie-in), so clearly a product that the question of its cinematic merit is strictly an afterthought.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Examiner Barbara Shulgasser
Except for the casting, it would be difficult to find any substantial difference between this movie and the previous ones, or this movie and any number of high-tech adventure movies of the last decade.
Read Full Review
50
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Directed by Joel Schumacher with occasional gestures toward social commentary, and enough spectacle to mask the movie's deep down emptiness.
Read Full Review
40
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Director Joel Schumacher submits to the Wagnerian bombast with an overly busy surface, and the script by Lee and Janet Scott Batchler and Akiva Goldsman basically runs through the formula as if it's a checklist.
Read Full Review
40
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
There's so much and so little going on here simultaneously that you're not sure whether to squirm or doze.
Read Full Review
40
Empire Adam Smith
If you can see beyond the eye-scorching neon and don't mind the desecration of a superhero icon, there's a few crumbs of enjoyment to be had.
Read Full Review
20
The New Yorker Terrence Rafferty
Schumacher's direction is coarse and slovenly: the picture has the self-conscious jokiness of the "Batman" TV series and the smudged, runny imagery of a cheaply printed comic book.
Read Full Review
20
Time Richard Corliss
The only thing Schumacher and his scrupulous craftsfolk forgot to give the movie was life -- the energizing spirit of wit and passion that makes scenes work and characters breathe.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 5.3 (out of 10) based on 15 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Dan A gave it a6:
What saves this movie is Tommy Lee Jones and Jim Carrey as Two-Face and The Joker. Jim Carrey is especially in place, while Two-Face's portrayal may be too psychotic, it's not nearly as bad as the Penguin or Mr. Freeze were.

[Anonymous] gave it a7:
A loose, entertaining Batman blockbuster with a great cast. Cool gadgets, but writings gets a little clunky here and there.

Jared C. gave it a10:
Hard Core and Superb.

Dave B. gave it a2:
Not the worst of the bunch, but I wonder what Joel Schumacher was thinking when he took over the franchise. Gotham was never to bright and lively and full of neon in the comic books. And ummmm DZ I think you are reviewing the wrong movie bud.

Travis M. gave it an8:
The most underated of all the Batman films.

DZ gave it a6:
Didn't mean much to my 8 year old mind when it first came out. These days, while it's slightly more watchable, it still fails to excite as much as some people might have you believe. The story is weak, the Prince songs are horrible (the same can't be said for the Elfman score though) and Keaton's rendition as the Dark Knight leaves a lot to the imagination. What I did enjoy about Keaton was his brilliant portrayal of the disturbed Bruce Wayne (one of my favourite scenes was his attempt at letting the cat out of the bag in Vale's apartment). Nicholson is wildly entertaining and his over-the-top antics are worth, at least, a single viewing.

Fred Bob gave it a7:
I like the film but it just didn't have enough of a punch for me.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use