CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Battlefield Earth
Warner Brothers

Battlefield Earth reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 9 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
2.4 out of 10
based on 33 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 88 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for intense sci-fi action

Starring John Travolta, Barry Pepper, Forrest Whitaker, Kim Coates, Sabine Karsenti, Michael Byrne, Christian Tessier, and Sylvain Landry

In the year 3000, after the alien Psychlos conquer Earth, killing most of the humans so that they can strip the Earth of its resources, one man comes out of hiding in search of other surviving humans and hoping to overthrow the aliens.


GENRE(S): Sci-fi  
WRITTEN BY: L. Ron Hubbard (novel)
Corey Mandell
J. David Shapiro
 
DIRECTED BY: Roger Christian  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: January 16, 2001 
Video: January 16, 2001 
Theatrical: May 12, 2000 
RUNNING TIME: 121 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

53
Mr. Showbiz Cody Clark
It's a lock to pile up the honors during Hollywood's annual awards season next spring (at the Golden Raspberries and the MTV Movie Awards).
50
San Francisco Chronicle Bob Graham
Is it worth seeing once? Sure.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Scientology or not, the movie is a battlefield bummer that makes you want to revolt.
50
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
It should have warned us that logic was also hitting hard times.
Read Full Review
38
Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach
An underlit, overlong, underwritten and overloud albatross of a movie.
38
Boston Globe Jay Carr
So heavy and lifeless that you keep waiting for those three little front-row kibitzers from "Mystery Science Theatre 3000" to appear at the bottom of the screen to start goofing on it.
38
USA Today Andy Seiler
The script, based on a novel by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard, is deeply dumb, depressingly derivative (ripping off "Planet of the Apes" the most) and just plain nonsense.
30
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
Shot after shot photographed at wobbly, off-center angles for no particular reason, weigh every action sequence down with super-slo-mo in lame imitation of "The Matrix" or end every single scene with a vertical wipe.
Read Full Review
25
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Just a lumbering, poorly photographed piece of derivative sci-fi drivel, full of grunting extras scampering around in animal pelts and more dank, trash-strewn sets than I ever care to see again.
Read Full Review
25
New York Post Lou Lumenick
Goes from being tediously terrible to downright gigglesome.
20
Village Voice J. Hoberman
The movie's mode is brutal and excremental.
Read Full Review
20
Variety Dennis Harvey
Yet the overall look, though derivative ("The Matrix," "Blade Runner," "Waterworld," etc.), rates as Battlefield's one non-guilty pleasure.
Read Full Review
20
Chicago Reader Lisa Alspector
Seems like a miscalculation on multiple levels.
Read Full Review
20
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
The story's broad strokes are painfully clichéd and its details make no sense at all.
Read Full Review
16
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
A ghastly, unappealing mess that lacks a single absorbing character, engaging story line or entertaining snippet of dialogue.
12
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
It's bombastic, chaotic, plodding, visually dreary and patchily written.
Read Full Review
12
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
A sluggish, soporific dud, the dreariest big-budget science-fiction adventure since "Dune."
12
San Francisco Examiner Wesley Morris
If filmmaking has ever been less thrilling and more disengaging, I'd like to see it.
Read Full Review
12
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Awful in so many different ways.
Read Full Review
10
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Let's cut to the chase: We're talking "Ishtar of the Apes."
Read Full Review
10
LA Weekly Ron Stringer
A stinker.
Read Full Review
10
Film.com Robert Horton
The film is Travolta's baby, but indifference and boredom is everywhere.
Read Full Review
10
Newsweek Ted Gideonse
The dialogue is inane, the acting wooden, and Roger Christian's directing choices are a lesson in sci-fi film cliché.
Read Full Review
10
TNT RoughCut J. Rentilly
The only danger in seeing this film is in busting a gut at its unintentional hilarity.
0
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
With this kind of epic ineptitude -- hell, the flick is set in the year 3000 -- you go for "worst of the millennium."
0
Film.com Sean Means
In the pantheon of cinematic train wrecks, from "Ishtar" to "Waterworld," set a place at the table for Battlefield Earth.
Read Full Review
0
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Simply put, Battlefield Earth is the worst film I've seen in over 10 years, and believe me, that's saying a lot.
Read Full Review
0
Los Angeles Times Robin Rauzi
Compounded by a dated visual style, patched-together special effects and ludicrous dialogue, Battlefield Earth is a wholly miserable experience.
Read Full Review
0
Washington Post Rita Kempley
A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.
Read Full Review
0
The New York Times A.O. Scott
It may be a bit early to make such judgments, but Battlefield Earth may well turn out to be the worst movie of this century.
Read Full Review
0
Time Richard Schickel
The worst movie in living memory.
0
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
One of the darkest, ugliest, most uninvolving and incomprehensible major-studio fantasies I've ever seen.
Read Full Review
0
Slate David Edelstein
A picture that will be hailed without controversy as the worst of its kind ever made.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 2.4 (out of 10) based on 88 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

kid block gave it a0:
Geez why people give this a higher rating which means they should be put into a mental institution if they like this film. Cause this movie sucks as hell because if poor plot and poor effects in this film.

Ben E. gave it a1:
This is possibly the worst movie ever made, but perhaps slightly better than Ben & Arthur.

John D. gave it a0:
Not one character was appealing. I enjoy science fiction a great deal but this reminds me why 99% of the time the movies are never done correctly or are able to be funded. Any made for tv movie would have been much better because at least you could blame a lack of funding, but this fails on such a large scale that its imeasurable. Never thought Id ever feel sorry for an actor before but Travolta this was just sad. Its his own fault though.

Stephen C. gave it a2:
Better than I thought it was going to be and I can still only give it a 2. It's shamelessly pandering to the same people that Scientology does, the not so smart segment of the population. Besides being a not very good sci-fi story in the first place it is also a bad adaptation of a bad story that is badly acted and badly directed. The best thing I can say is some of the acting is so bad it's laughable, especially Mr. Travolta.

Anon gave it a0:
The most clichéd science fiction piece I have ever witnessed. Absolutely terribly written and the acting inspired no emotional reaction.

David D. gave it a10:
Best bilingual scifi movie of all time In a country where bilingual English/Spanish signage is scoffed at by the illiterate provincial masses, I don't expect a movie as brilliantly bilingual as BattleField Earth to have been embraced. Just as I am ahead of my times for my ability to speak Chinese, so BattleField Earth is ahead of its time in presenting the inhabitants of Psyclo as non-native English speakers who need to tech their enemy their language before they can communicate with him. That aspect was misunderstood by the uni-lingual American masses. In a world where only 7% of the people speak English as their native language, I find it insulting to see SciFi movies where Romulans and Naboo-ians speak perfect English. The "cultural elite" often praise themselves on watching foreign films with subtitles, yet the same people scoff at the best bilingual scifi movie of all times - BattleField Earth. BattleField Earth gets 2 thumbs up from this critic.

Dale H. gave it a0:
This movie was so bad it was amazing that the stars accepted these roles, in two weeks time the primitive people know how to fly fighter jets? It also moved way too fast and was so stupid how the tryed to talk, piece of crap movie, don't waste your time.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | iPhone 3G | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use