CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



Boogie Nights
New Line Cinema

Boogie Nights reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 85 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
8.1 out of 10
based on 28 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 26 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for strong sex scenes with explicit dialogue, nudity, drug use, language and violence

Starring Mark Wahlberg, Burt Reynolds, Julianne Moore, Luis Guzmán, Don Cheadle, Philip Baker Hall, Philip Seymour Hoffman, and Heather Graham

A multifaceted look at the porn industry in Los Angeles in the 70's and 80's, focusing on the journey of a young man (Wahlberg) from restaurant dishwasher to porn star and beyond.


GENRE(S): Drama  
WRITTEN BY: Paul Thomas Anderson  
DIRECTED BY: Paul Thomas Anderson  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: April 7, 1998 
Video: April 7, 1998 
Theatrical: October 10, 1997 
RUNNING TIME: 152 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
New York Daily News Jami Bernard
Writer-director Paul Thomas Anderson has perfectly wedded form to function by filming Boogie Nights in a style suggesting the grainy texture of porn and the ambivalence of the era.
Read Full Review
100
The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps
While it's very funny, Boogie Nights taps into something much deeper with its on-target depiction of the shifting political and social tides of the '70s and '80s and thoughtful relationships between characters. It's a deeply satisfying movie.
Read Full Review
100
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
With Boogie Nights, we know we're not just watching episodes from disparate lives but a panorama of recent social history, rendered in bold, exuberant colors.
Read Full Review
100
The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann
If Boogie Nights were poorly made and acted, its materials would make it intolerably tawdry. But its so well done that we keep watching. [Nov. 10, 1997]
100
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
A hard-core movie with a soft, light-hearted center and an edge like a knife.
100
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Mark Wahlberg, in a star-making performance, has the kind of electric ingenuousness that John Travolta did in "Saturday Night Fever."
Read Full Review
100
USA Today Staff [Not Credited]
With its ceaseless music, large canvas, shrewd casting and flawless ensemble acting and the dexterity of its whiplashing mood switches, the movie recalls Robert Altman's "Nashville" more than any subsequent movie has.
Read Full Review
100
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Has the quality of many great films, in that it always seems alive.
Read Full Review
90
Film.com John Hartl
He (Anderson) simply doesn't allow for dull moments, and his gifts for irony and showmanship are clearly appreciated by a collection of actors who have rarely been better.
90
Variety Emanuel Levy
Darkly comic, vastly entertaining and utterly original.
Read Full Review
90
Mr. Showbiz Kevin Maynard
That rarest of independent films -- it's risky and exciting.
90
TNT RoughCut Andy Jones
As lensed brillantly by 26-year-old Anderson, the movie is at once tasteful and raunchy.
89
Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten
From the second it begins, Boogie Nights seizes your senses and pulls you right in: no turning back, no time for debate, no regrets.
Read Full Review
88
San Francisco Examiner G. Allen Johnson
I'm not sure all of this works out as convincingly as Anderson intends in the movie's somewhat unsatisfying ending, but getting there is a wickedly enjoyable journey.
Read Full Review
88
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Isn't just an expose of the porn industry -- it's a provocative and involving character study, as well.
Read Full Review
88
Baltimore Sun Ann Hornaday
A grand, sweeping nostalgia trip that evokes the sickness of an era even as it tries to find its essential humanity.
80
The New York Times Elvis Mitchell
The movie's special gift happens to be Mark Wahlberg, who gives a terrifically appealing performance in this tricky role.
Read Full Review
80
Newsweek B.J. Sigesmund
A stunning glimpse at acting -- and life -- in the raw.
Read Full Review
80
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Notwithstanding its occasional grotesque nods to postmodernist convention, this is highly entertaining Hollywood filmmaking, full of spark and vigor.
Read Full Review
80
Time Richard Corliss
So here's a tip for those attending this handsomely acted, epic-length little film. Ease into the sleaze, stare at the party animals, look but don't touch, and, oh, boogie all night. [October 6, 1997]
80
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
A true storyteller, able to easily mix and match moods in a playful and audacious manner, he (Anderson) is a filmmaker definitely worth watching, both now and in the future.
Read Full Review
70
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
He (Anderson) manages to guide his cast of characters through an epic story of self-delusion with a skill and grace that many more experienced filmmakers would be hard put to match.
Read Full Review
70
Film.com Tom Keogh
A film so driven by pure style that a script barely seems necessary in its first half, Boogie Nights becomes bogged down in a predictable aftermath of drug deals, post-stardom decay, cocaine-fueled nuttiness, and self-loathing.
70
Salon.com Charles Taylor
Moore, who may be the most unpredictably talented actress in movies right now, plays Amber with an inseparable mixture of maternal feeling and lust that's flabbergasting.
Read Full Review
70
Dallas Observer Peter Rainer
It's a deeply divided film--hugely ambitious and uneven, with sequences that seem to point to a new, comically flagrant movie sexuality and others that drag one into the funky muddle of the dreariest dopehead downers from the '70s.
Read Full Review
60
Slate Sarah Kerr
These late scenes are over the top, as mean and reductive as editorials in a tabloid, and they nearly extinguish the moral subtlety of what's gone before.
Read Full Review
50
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Heavily influenced by Quentin Tarantino's brand of quirky sensationalism, this high-energy saga by Paul Thomas Anderson goes a long way toward exposing the greed and stupidity of the pornography trade, then loses its moral compass and steers toward a sadly superficial ending.
Read Full Review
50
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
It's possible to be dazzled by a movie and still not like it very much.

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 8.1 (out of 10) based on 26 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

O Luc gave it a10:
Sometimes, I come back to this movie and I think about it, and I wonder, "Why isn't this movie being praised as well as othe movies of it's era, like Fargo, or Titanic?" More and more I wonder why people look more towards Quentin Tarantino then P.T. Anderson when it comes to directing, because this movie is just one of those movies that really is brought togethor by the film's atomesphere and screenplay, which were both done by Anderson. This movie is better than what many grade it to be, so if you like Robert Altman, than see Boogie Nights, the modern-day Nashville!

Keyton E. gave it a2:
Quite possibly the most overrated film of all time. I was bored to tears, which is truly unfortunate because I wanted to love this movie, and I tried to love this movie, but it's just boring.

J. Ryan G. gave it a7:
I own this movie on DVD, and I've seen it at least a half-dozen times. Still, I don't quite get what it is trying to say. Perhaps that's why I keep going back--trying to solve a magnificent puzzle. Everyone in the film is brilliant--especially William H. Macy--and a very real atmosphere is created by the throbbing music, the virtuoso camera work, and the precise editing. But I get the feeling that the writer-director, Paul Thomas Anderson, did not make a complete statement. Why tell this story? I say, enjoy the film for what it has to offer; but be aware that, unlike its main character, the film has its shortcomings.

Michael M. gave it a 10:
An excellent movie! I really enjoyed it. It was a bit disturbing at parts, but still very good. You'll notices great performances given by Burt Renyolds, Julianne Moore, Don Cheadle , John C. Reilly, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Robert Ridgley and Alfred Molina (considering he had a very tiny role, he really did alot with it). I wasn't too thrilled about Mark Wahlberg's performance. In my opinion I don't think he is a very good actor. He always plays the same part in every film he stars in. The directing and writing in the film are absolutley outstanding. I was especially taken by the direction of the donut shop shoot out that appears about 2 hours into the movie. If you are looking for an interesting movie to watch, rent or buy Boogie Nights. Be sure to get the New Line Platinum Series. (1/23/03)

Andrew M. gave it a 5:
I was not won over by this film. I will admit there are scenes that are wholly effective and work...but the finished product is unimposing and somewhat vacuous. The film doesn't really give us anything; there is a lot promised, little delivered. For those that say it was an insight into the ropey, debauched lifestyle prevalent in the American adult industry during the 60's and 70's, just what exactly was so illuminating? What stunning revelations were shown? It all seemed to me second-hand news... drugs, parties, disco, money.... uh-huh, really, I did not know that! Anyway, I don't want to be too harsh... The film does have some redeeming qualities and is not without merit. Burt Reynolds is fantastic. He embodies his character perfectly and is impressively convincing. Graham and Moore aren't given much to work with but both do favourably. Wahlberg is as good as Wahlberg gets, which is average. The cinematography and production sets are the real high points - the film looks exactly like what it is portraying in most scenes. Very skillfully shot. But all in all, it's a film that is weaker than the sum of its parts and all the more undistinguished for it.

Jonathan M. gave it a 10:
This is a great film. What more can one want, great direction, script and acting are all in this movie. Simply wonderful.

Dan M. gave it an 8:
Burt Reynolds can act. And he is very good in this film.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise | Partnerships                                Visit other CNET Networks sites:

Copyright ©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use