CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Donnie Darko
Newmarket Film Group

Donnie Darko reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 71 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
9.3 out of 10
based on 21 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 304 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for language, some drug use and violence

Starring Jake Gyllenhaal, Jena Malone, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Mary McDonnell, Drew Barrymore, Noah Wyle, Patrick Swayze, and Katharine Ross

A genre-busting fable that blasts the American suburban drama into a wildly imaginative realm of time travel, alternative universes and the manipulation of one's fate. (IFC Films)


GENRE(S): Drama  |  Fantasy  |  Mystery  |  Sci-fi  
WRITTEN BY: Richard Kelly  
DIRECTED BY: Richard Kelly  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: March 19, 2002 
Video: March 19, 2002 
Theatrical: October 26, 2001 
RUNNING TIME: 122 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
New Times (L.A.) Jean Oppenheimer
Like gathering storm clouds, Donnie Darko creates an atmosphere of eerie calm and mounting menace -- stands as one of the most exceptional movies of 2001.
Read Full Review
91
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
Kelly, the 26-year-old writer-director of this excitingly original indie vision, shares more artistically with Wes Anderson or Paul Thomas Anderson than he does with Spielberg or John Hughes, but the point is, he's out on his own here. He swings big -- with flair.
Read Full Review
90
LA Weekly Joe Donnelly
It is funny, sad and beautiful. And it's right on time.
Read Full Review
90
Village Voice J. Hoberman
Certainly the most original and venturesome American indie I've seen this year.
Read Full Review
80
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Appealingly, the movie has a certain lightness -- like the aforementioned butterfly -- which makes its foreboding qualities surprisingly user-friendly.
Read Full Review
80
Mr. Showbiz Michael Atkinson
The nerviest, oddest, most outlandish and idiosyncratic American indie debut since "Buffalo 66," Richard Kelly's Donnie Darko defies description.
80
Los Angeles Times Jan Stuart
If you let it be what it is, Donnie Darko will knock you flat.
Read Full Review
80
Chicago Reader Lisa Alspector
Kelly is a supple and courageous storyteller, boldly free-associating as he mixes parody and satire with earnest psychodrama and coming up with plot points no one could anticipate.
Read Full Review
80
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
A stunning technical accomplishment that virtually bursts with noise, ideas and references, but it's fundamentally a gracefully crafted movie that's about human beings and not images.
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones
So much here is equally befuddling and beguiling; I caught myself leaning in toward the screen repeatedly, trying to somehow get closer to the gorgeous impenetrability of the story, of the boy.
Read Full Review
75
New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman
The flaws are more than balanced out by the risks the earnest Kelly encourages his excellent cast to take.
Read Full Review
75
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Paula Nechak
Its only constant is that it's strangely eloquent and quite original.
Read Full Review
75
New York Post Lou Lumenick
Most experienced filmmakers wouldn't even attempt a film that's so blackly funny, that so rapidly shifts genres and tone, and that layers late '80s cultural references so thickly, from "E.T." to Smurfs.
Read Full Review
70
Variety Todd McCarthy
Has plenty of problems. But most stem from a young filmmaker overswinging on his first time up to the plate and hitting a deep fly out rather than a home run.
Read Full Review
70
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
David Lynch lite.
Read Full Review
63
Boston Globe Loren King
The debut feature from 26-year-old director Richard Kelly shows plenty of promise, but it's somewhat self-involved and won't appeal to audiences who like a straightforward -- even if fantastical -- narrative.
63
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Donnie Darko is the one that got away. But it was fun trying to land it.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Bob Graham
If this movie ever figured out what it wanted to be when it grows up, it would be a terrific one.
Read Full Review
40
Film Threat Chris Gore
This is really one of those Rorschach test films. You either love it or hate it. For those who loved it, I have only one word: overrated.
Read Full Review
40
The New York Times A.O. Scott
It's this compulsion to solder melancholy to weightlessness that constantly trips up the movie; Mr. Kelly doesn't have the assurance to pull off such a difficult feat.
Read Full Review
38
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Just another self-absorbed teen chronicle, with the added twist of a little time travel and a surprise ending.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 9.3 (out of 10) based on 304 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Ryan K gave it a10:
One of the best movies I've seen. If you can't relate with the main character you most likely were a dick in high school.

R W gave it a10:
This is one of the few movies I had to rewatch to see if I missed something. The visual for the time portals was not very good and its concept was not great, but it did not detract from the story too badly.

Shannon P. gave it a5:
This is two movies mashed into one. The first is a clever black comedy, covering similar territory to Heathers and other 20-something movies based on characters nominally in their teens. For this, the movie is well written, cast, and acted. Though hardly original, it is vitally amusing. The other movie--the attempt to do something new with the genre--involves a jumbled and pretentious mix of pseudo-psychology and pseudo-science. If you think you may care about either, unless you confuse confusion with art, you won’t by the end of this film. The dull and dark cinematography only adds to the pseudo-intellectual tedium.

Christopher J. gave it a6:
The movie asks some interesting questions, but doesn't rap it up well. Pretentious people will pretend to understand it completely. It does a good job of stretching a menacing feeling even well after the movie is done.

Chad S. gave it a6:
This movie, ultimately, is either you love it or you hate it. Donnie Darko is not visually stunning or technically raising the bar by any means, however from the beginning to end you are filled with suspension, always questioning whats going to happen or why is this happening. The suspense Donnie Darko fills you with is a good feeling, and makes the movie enjoyable, but unfortunately the ending doesnt do a good job of helping you understand what the heck just happened. With that being said, i give the film a 6 because it is enjoyable to watch, it just ends without making enough sense. I personally researched, watched the commentary, and researched some more to fully understand the plot, and there is an extremely, elaborate, good plot, full of time continuums, paradoxes, and alternate universes, behind Donnie Darko. I can say, without a doubt, that there is no possible way that the entire logic behind Donnie Darko could have been expressed within this movie, there is simply too much. Overall Donnie Darko is a love it or hate it movie...in my opinion i enjoyed everything, except for having to do research to make sense of the ending, and since i had to do research i am deducting points from the movie, also it isnt a flashy, or eye catching movie, its dull as far as the camera goes. If your interested in seeing this then give it a shot, but if you have doubts then don't.

Armond A. gave it a0:
When I saw this film a few years ago, I was puzzled by the jacket blurbs that had "conned" me into watching it, and I must confess that its growing status as an Indie classic is the last thing I would have expected as I pulled it out of the dvd player. There's no point in my raking it over the coals; plenty of us have already done that. Yet the movie speaks to quite a few people, and for me that is one test of its value. My guess is that many of us have either never known or forgotten the brutal impact that kids in high school have upon one another, even when the person experiencing the assault knows at some level that the whole thing is preposterous. In this sad film the victim becomes unglued, as if succumbing to prolonged flogging with (what we may see as) wet noodles. Let this serve as a cautionary story to us old-timers who think that REAL harm to kids is found only in bullies who look and act like Bluto or strange fruitcakes who collect the underwear of neighborhood teens.

Jeremy M. gave it a10:
It's a fantastic love story. And that's all it truly aims to be. Everything else is just scenery.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: World News | Fantasy Football | Amy Winehouse | Baseball | E3 | Batman | Firefox 3 | iPhone 3G

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use