|
Upcoming Release Calendar
xx
Beer for My Horses Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
Equilibrium
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
MPAA RATING: R for violence
Starring Christian Bale, Emily Watson, Taye Diggs, Angus MacFadyen, Sean Bean, William Fichtner, and Dominic Purcell
In a future society, citizens are prevented from expressing emotions and are controlled by militaristic police with the enforced use of a dehumanizing drug.
| GENRE(S): | Suspense/Thriller |
| WRITTEN BY: | Kurt Wimmer |
| DIRECTED BY: | Kurt Wimmer |
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: May 13, 2003 Video: May 13, 2003 Theatrical: December 6, 2002 |
| RUNNING TIME: | minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: | USA |
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
The average user rating for this movie is 8.6 (out of 10) based on 123 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
TARGET1058 gave it a10:
Great movie...might not make you think a whole lot but the action and it being something different makes up for it.
Alex P gave it a7:
Granted this is no Oscar caliber movie this is probably the harshest critic score on all of metacritic and that is a big statement. This movie is very entertaining while managing to keep an interesting storyline and believable acting, and when I think of all the far worse movies (and there are many of them) who have received about double the score I really wonder what the critics expect. I does give me hope though to see the huge abyss between the users and critics scores.
Stefan M. gave it a10:
those who gave this film 0 are jealous!!!! OK, it has from films like Fahrenheit 451, 1984, etc. some ideas, but Kurt Wimmer was doing this project for 12 years and his final product, Equilibrium, is fantastic movie! so, those who gave it less than 6 can come here and suck my balls!!!!!!!!!
Matt L gave it a9:
I'm going to have to side with the general public on this one: it was indeed a good, and more importantly, fun movie. I think critics, in their pursuit of pure analytical commentary of movies, have forgotten the magic of the movies : having fun. Sure, the story was a little inconsistent, overused, what have you, but me and my friends had a blast watching it.
MiKE gave it an8:
This movie, actually "works" Just dont take it seriously! and You will have a good time watching it. Sure there are numerous thins which dont make any sense, but overall, somehow, the director got luck and made a decent movie worth seeing.
Michael M. gave it a2:
For a surprisingly large group of talented actors, this was pretty much a steaming pile. The premise behind the movie was beyond juvenile and rife with inconsistencies. Why would a repressive future society need to so clearly mimic the aesthetics of Nazi Germany? Why is art equated with emotion? Is emotion what REALLY defines humanity, is emotion REALLY what is the source of conflict in our society, rather than calculated rational decisions in the struggle for power? Is the movie self aware enough to realize the irony inherent in the actions of the principle actors in regards to the premise of an emotionless fascist society? Conceptually flawed, is the action enough to redeem this movie? In the end the answer to all these questions is no, as the action is mediocre and the acting transparent, the plot predictable and the conclusion forgone within the first few minutes of the film. I'm a big fan of SF movies, and will champion any movie that truly reveals something about the human condition, extrapolates an interesting society or scenario, or can engross me to the extent that i will suspend my disbelief and accept the premise that is being presented to me. That a movie like this gets such high marks from viewers profoundly disturbs me.
Andrew K gave it a9:
This movie was well shot and compared to many other hack n slash sci-fi action movies, the plot/script had some thought put into it. Contrary to the negative comments of the press. I, as a viewer and person, consider it a well done movie. What do you most of the comments have to back up their negatives? Reviews on other, past movies. Review a movie based on itself and you have a good movie.. not because you care to think about other movies in its place. Encore.

| Return to top of page |

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL
About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise
© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use