CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



Fish Called Wanda, A
MGM

Fish Called Wanda, A reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 80 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
8.0 out of 10
based on 17 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 11 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R

Starring John Cleese, Jamie Lee Curtis, Kevin Kline, and Michael Palin

In this zany comedy, four disparate characters (Cleese, Curtis, Kline, Palin) attempt a daring jewel heist.


GENRE(S): Comedy  
WRITTEN BY: John Cleese
Charles Crichton
 
DIRECTED BY: Charles Crichton  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: March 23, 1999 
Video: October 8, 1996 
Theatrical: July 29, 1988 
RUNNING TIME: 108 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

Kevin Kline won an Oscar in 1989 for his supporting performance. The film also picked up Oscar nominations for Original Screenplay and Directing.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
The funniest movie I have seen in a long time.
Read Full Review
100
Time Richard Schickel
Think of A Fish Called Wanda as the next best thing to a Looney Tunes-Merrie Melodies summerfest…Wanda defies gravity, in both senses of the word, and redefines a great comic tradition. [July 18, 1988]
100
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Jay Scott
May be less than the sum of its parts, but its parts are more impressive than most other wholes around.
Read Full Review
100
ReelViews James Berardinelli
One of the best-constructed, funniest, and most clever comedies to grace motion picture screens in recent years. It's outrageous, offensive, and even a little sick -- and all the more enjoyable because of it.
Read Full Review
100
Mr. Showbiz Carmel Dagan
Director Charles Crichton's hilarious romp.
100
Los Angeles Times Sheila Benson
A convulsively funny affair.[15 July 1988, Calendar, p. 6-1]
100
San Francisco Chronicle Peter Stack
I laughed so hard, my eyes watered. I laughed so loud, I lost track of whether anyone else was laughing. I laughed so much, I ached afterwards. [29 July 1988, Daily Notebook, p.E1]
90
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Crichton keeps the laughs coming with infectious energy.
Read Full Review
90
Washington Post Rita Kempley
It's a deliciously dishy comedy, but like sushi an acquired taste.
Read Full Review
80
Variety Staff (Not credited)
Curtis steals the show with her keen sense of comic timing and sneaky little grins and asides.
Read Full Review
80
Washington Post Desson Thomson
It'll keep you amused enough to sit still and even remember it fondly.
Read Full Review
80
Rolling Stone Hal Erickson
If it is indeed possible for a film to be both stylish and tasteless, then A Fish Called Wanda certainly fills the bill.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Tribune Dave Kehr
Contains some gaspingly funny moments. [29 July 1988, Friday, p.A]
75
USA Today Mike Clark
This crumbled-caper comedy is the funniest movie ever from a film maker late in his eighth decade. [22 July 1988, Life, p.4D]
60
TV Guide Staff(not credited)
With British-American culture clash as its dominant theme, A Fish Called Wanda bristles with wit, enlivened by delightfully over-the-top ensemble acting.
Read Full Review
50
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
There are a few hilarious moments, and a few more that are foolish and even disgusting. [15 July 1988, Art and Leisure, p.21]
30
The New York Times Vincent Canby
The dialogue reports funny things instead of showing them. The movie remains in a limbo halfway between the informed anarchy of Monty Python comedy stripped of all social and political satire, and the comparatively genteel comedy of "The Lavender Hill Mob." [15 July 1988, p.C8]

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 8.0 (out of 10) based on 11 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Tucker C. gave it a10:
Totally awesome and funny movie.

Andrew M. gave it a 9:
Me, my friends and my family saw this movie several times when it came out and it was universally agreed to be one of the best modern comedies yet made. It artfully merges all different aspects of comedy into a hilarious blend of absurdity, played out by gifted, perfectly-cast actors. A riot from go to whoa, a movie that will become timeless.

Pat C. gave it a 10:
The supreme achievement to evolve from the Monty Python scene. Try to list the 10 funniest comedies you've ever seen without including this one. This is Comedy Ghastly without peer. If three precious little dogs are put down, each funnier than the last, we are in the presence of masters. The only problem is that such humor is an acquired taste. Here's your chance to pig out. Can you say Cathcart?

Am H. gave it a 10:
I love this movie, i watch it over and over again, though i can't really say why. The blossoming relationship between the characters of Wanda and Archie is wonderful to watch. For some reason, John Cleese was kind of attractive in this movie, almost more than Kevin Kline. As for Jamie, they did a good job on that plastic surgery girl!

raVen gave it a 0:
Kevin Kline's character makes me feel like gagging on a... ...Well, on anything, really. Jamie Lee Curtis, surprisingly, was the only person I could bear to watch. The comedy is mean, the characters are mean, (save Michael Palin's, who is wasted and abused) and the film makes you question the status of humanity. Nothing of value comes from this movie. Nothing. That is, with the possible exception of the greater respect one has for how rare and fleeting Cleese's Monty Python genius was. the funnier Palin, happily, has moved on to better things. The movie is all the more loathsome for having wasted their talents. Awful piece of trash.

Yoon Min C. gave it a 7:
Good smart comedy but too far on the absurd and obnoxious side. Goes over-the-top bit too often.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise | Partnerships                                Visit other CNET Networks sites:

Copyright ©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use