Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Flannel Pajamas

EMAILPRINTGigantic Pictures

Flannel Pajamas reviews
49
5.8 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 19 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 8 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Romance

Written by: Jeff Lipsky

Directed by: Jeff Lipsky

Release Date:
Theatrical: November 15, 2006
DVD: April 10, 2007

Running Time: 124 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: Not Rated

Starring Justin Kirk, Julianne Nicholson, Rebecca Schull, Jamie Harrold, Chelsea Altman, Michelle Federer, Tom Bower, and Stephanie Roth Haberle

Fearlessly following one couple's descent from the giddy high of new love into the inevitable mire of everyday routine, Flannel Pajamas is that rare film that dares to feature characters as endearing and messy as those that inhabit our real lives. (Gigantic Pictures)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

90

Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir

So truly and exceptionally fine, a spiny and dispassionate little masterpiece of a marriage movie.

Read Full Review >
75

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

Strong performances and sharp dialogue distinguish Jeff Lipsky's melancholy second feature, which charts the two-year course of a "perfect" relationship whose flaws are evident from the outset.

Read Full Review >
75

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

Curiously, the film seems to have no discernible point, and yet -- this is practically unique -- the absence of a point becomes, in itself, a form of narrative interest.

Read Full Review >
70

The New York Times Stephen Holden

Mr. Lipsky’s screenplay, a messy collection of fragments arranged chronologically, adds up to one of the most intimate screen portraits of a relationship ever attempted.

Read Full Review >
67

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

The hero remains such an exhibitionistically cocky, walled-off jerk that Flannel Pajamas' glib conversational ''candor'' yields no mystery. And that's a problem in two hours of talk.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington

Love can be a battleground, and, despite its homey-sounding title and gentle, almost nonchalant air, Jeff Lipsky's Flannel Pajamas gives us a series of messages from the front.

Read Full Review >
58

Portland Oregonian Marc Mohan

You never really end up rooting for their happiness, as a couple or individually, so emotionally there's not much at stake.

Read Full Review >
50

Seattle Post-Intelligencer Bill White

In what essentially is a two-character play, Kirk and Nicholson behave more like acting partners than real people. Their lack of appetite for each other is particularly awkward in the frequent scenes requiring casual nudity and sexual activity.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Reader Andrea Gronvall

The script is overwritten and has too many themes--suicide, abuse, anti-Semitism--to support, but Nicholson does remarkable work in an unsympathetic role, helped by Lipsky's fine control of his characters.

Read Full Review >
50

The Hollywood Reporter James Greenberg

What starts out seeming like a poor man's Woody Allen morphs into something closer to an American version of "Scenes From a Marriage."

Read Full Review >
50

Variety Todd McCarthy

Visually, the film is without flair or ambition, conveying no sense of atmosphere or mood. But the performances put it over.

Read Full Review >
50

Village Voice Rob Nelson

At a full two hours, Lipsky's talky movie is more compelling in its second half, when the spouses finally get around to being themselves.

Read Full Review >
40

LA Weekly Scott Foundas

The results are far from perfect: For one thing, Lipsky is so far from being a fluid visual storyteller that the garishly lit, appallingly composed Flannel Pajamas makes another two-hander talkfest Lipsky famously distributed -- "My Dinner With Andre" -- seem like "Lawrence of Arabia" by comparison.

Read Full Review >
40

Los Angeles Times Carina Chocano

For all the time we spend watching Justin and Nicole negotiate their needs, we have no idea who these people are.

Read Full Review >
38

New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman

Ever been on a blind date that you knew would be dismal from the start? Well, this is the movie version of that date, stretched out over the slowest two hours imaginable.

Read Full Review >
38

New York Post Lou Lumenick

For much of Flannel Pajamas I wondered if the couple's big problem was that Stuart was secretly gay. Nothing so interesting - he's just a narcissistic control freak and she's off-puttingly needy.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Ann Hornaday

The two main characters are so shallow and self-involved -- not to mention the friends, family members and sundry apparatchiks they lug around with them -- that the two hours of Flannel Pajamas begin to feel like real time.

Read Full Review >
25

The Onion (A.V. Club) Tasha Robinson

Opaque acting, excruciating dialogue, and flat, affectless direction certainly don't help, but even in brilliant hands, Flannel Pajamas would still be a movie about two horrible, unsympathetic people doing dreadful things to each other, and learning nothing in the process. Why should anyone else have to endure it too?

Read Full Review >
20

Film Threat Don R. Lewis

The thing is, these chatty, pedantic, annoying characters are simply not interesting enough to follow for five minutes, let alone over two hours.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 5.8 (out of 10) based on 8 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Jerry M. gave it a10:
"One of the wisest films I can remember about love and human intimacy. I will not forget it." Roger Ebert That about says it all.

Evie B. gave it a2:
Wow, this movie was really boring. And it irritated me that the seasons never changed. When they went to Montana for Christmas, the leaves were just turning. When they got married in June, the leves were just turning. Bad art direction.

drew H. gave it a1:
This is going on the very bottom shelf. If you believe the failures of marriage are best expressed in a masochistic, tedious two hours full of unbelievably self-involved individuals who lack the humor and self-awareness to be relatable, then this is the torture rod for you. Maybe stereotypical "Neurotic New Yorkers" (as in the roughly two percent of the city that actually lives in posh 36 floor Tribeca flats) feels this way about marriage but that species is by all accounts, insane. That and the dialog is incredulous and the acting doesn't get around it. So many loose ends are never developed... like did the mother have Alzheimer's or what? This movie needs to be beaten with a humor stick and so does the scriptwriter's face. Mercilessly.

Gregory M. gave it a2:
This movie is a DOWNER. The charachters are boring, sad, fickle people, and the filim never offers any real insights into their relationship. This is a cold movie and it will leave you dissatisfied, in a bad mood, and $10 worse for the wear.

Daniel M. gave it a10:
Haunting...one of my favorite films of 2006.

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | March Madness | TV | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use