CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Friends with Money
Sony Pictures Classics

Friends with Money reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 68 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
5.3 out of 10
based on 38 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 44 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for language, some sexual content and brief drug use

Starring Jennifer Aniston, Frances McDormand, Joan Cusack, Catherine Keener, Greg Germann, Simon McBurney, Jason Isaacs, and Scott Caan

Friends With Money examines the shifting relationships between four women who have been friends all of their adult lives. Now as they settle into their early middle age, their friendship is increasingly challenged by the ever-growing disparity in their individual degrees of financial comfort. It is a poignant snapshot of the way we live today, where the safe divisions that class and money have created are eroding under the unstoppable force of everyday life and the result is a painfully hilarious examination of modern life that manages to be both brutally honest and ultimately uplifting. (Sony Pictures Classics)


GENRE(S): Comedy  |  Drama  |  Romance  
WRITTEN BY: Nicole Holofcener  
DIRECTED BY: Nicole Holofcener  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: August 29, 2006 
Theatrical: April 7, 2006 
RUNNING TIME: 88 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

91
The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
Holofcener possesses a genius for creating exquisitely realized characters who seem to have led full, rich, complicated lives before the film's first scene takes place, and will go on living complex, idiosyncratic existences long after they disappear from the screen. Of course, it doesn't hurt that she has four of the best actresses in Hollywood as the leads, especially Keener.
Read Full Review
88
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Smart, witty and alert to the buried resentments that poke through the shiny surface of affluence, Holofcener's film recognizes that money is the new sex.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Tribune Allison Benedikt
Acutely perceptive and slyly quick-witted.
Read Full Review
88
TV Guide Ken Fox
For a film that feels so breezy on the surface, it's a surprisingly complex character study.
Read Full Review
88
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
Holofcener writes with an ear for the rhythms and ridiculousness of real life, and her cast - to a man, and woman - embraces her words with subtlety and certitude. Friends With Money is gimmickless, and great.
Read Full Review
80
The New York Times Manohla Dargis
Greatly appealing if not especially adventurous, either for its director or for her admirers.
Read Full Review
80
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
The result is an exquisitely calibrated hypermodern comedy of manners. A quiet but devastating ensemble piece, both acerbic and sweet, "Friends" blends empathy and a great sense of comic timing with the richness of Holofcener's trademark take-no-prisoners observations.
Read Full Review
80
The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt
A pitch-perfect ensemble comedy that burrows deep into the mind-set of white, upper middle-class Angelenos, anxious to strike the right balance among career, family, love life and money but never quite pulling it off.
Read Full Review
80
The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann
Holofcener's new film is extraordinary: it engages us from beginning to end without strong narrative, or narratives. It lives through the quality of Holofcener's dialogue and the performances that she has drawn from her actors.
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones
The only weak link here is Aniston's character – her Olivia, stuck in a holding pattern, feels like a holdover from Holofcener's previous, single-girl pictures, and Aniston underplays the role to the point of expressionlessness.
Read Full Review
75
Miami Herald Connie Ogle
Turns out to be amusing and astute, a smart observation on the ups and downs of female friendships.
Read Full Review
75
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Paula Nechak
While most of the film is well-written and acted, there are some difficulties. Aniston's Olivia is hard to figure.
Read Full Review
75
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
It's a movie of charm and insight, well-acted and carefully observed, but it's also one that lacks any real heights to offset the generic competence that characterizes it. There's no real drama to follow, no surprises of sufficient magnitude to enliven the experience.
Read Full Review
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
Holofcener's work is character and dialogue-driven, with a keen sense of prickly female competitiveness and intimacy that a man couldn't, and probably wouldn't, dare portray.
Read Full Review
75
New York Post Lou Lumenick
Aniston's best on-screen performance since "The Good Girl."
Read Full Review
75
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
Holofcener writes as well as Albert Brooks at his best, and her finesse with actors is as assured as James L. Brooks's on his TV and film projects from 20 and 30 years ago.
Read Full Review
75
Premiere Glenn Kenny
With the almost half-decade spaces between Holofcener's three features, one might (rather unreasonably, I admit) expect her to have sought to break wholly new ground in the interim. So she hasn't; nevertheless, Friends is well-crafted, intelligent, genuinely adult fare.
Read Full Review
75
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
There is also a manufactured symmetry, an every-gal's-got-issues roundness, an HBO sitcomitude to the movie that undercuts its own observational intelligence.
Read Full Review
70
LA Weekly Ella Taylor
If Friends With Money is about the meaning of success in a town obsessed with wealth, it is also, more universally, about our defining incompleteness, and the sad, uproarious inconclusiveness of life.
Read Full Review
70
Variety Todd McCarthy
Stealing the show is Jane, whose rage-fueled rants and scarcely concealed mutterings are loaded with sarcastic bon mots that are delivered to the hilt by McDormand.
Read Full Review
70
Newsweek David Ansen
Holofcener gets the milieu beguilingly right, but the abrupt ending leaves you wanting more.
Read Full Review
70
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
This is a dense and sophisticated work about mortality, materialism, madness, jealousy and pity.
Read Full Review
70
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
In her third feature Nicole Holofcener leapfrogs between characters with wit and grace, gathering them in various clusters and adroitly showing how money or the lack thereof really does inflect their lives and interactions.
Read Full Review
70
Dallas Observer Melissa Levine
Smart, patient and ruefully funny... Yet because the film never digs too far into any single person's world, it doesn't build toward much.
Read Full Review
63
New York Daily News Jami Bernard
The four ladies of Friends With Money are people I wouldn't want to ride the bus with (not that some of them would be caught dead on public transportation). They're whiners with little self-knowledge. Perhaps that's what holds them together, but it's not pretty.
Read Full Review
63
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Most crucially, we don't learn what brought the four women together; Olivia's so much younger than the others that there's no reason to think they'd ever have befriended her.
Read Full Review
60
Village Voice J. Hoberman
As its title jokingly implies, this is a more grown-up version of Aniston's long- running TV vehicle--complete with the star herself as eternal ingenue.
Read Full Review
60
New York Magazine David Edelstein
Friends With Money doesn't quite snap into focus. It just floats along-an agreeable comedy of manners with actors you like to hang out with.
Read Full Review
60
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Anger is the rocket fuel of drama. Of the four women in Nicole Holofcener's Friends With Money, only Frances McDormand's Jane is flamingly angry, and she's the most vivid character in the group.
60
Empire Angie Errigo
While this doesn't add up to much more than 'It's good to be rich and have friends', it's entertaining, with some choice performances and the laugh-out-loud quotient of a good sketch show.
Read Full Review
58
Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach
There's a self-loathing at the center of Friends with Money that makes it a tad unpalatable, as well as a sameness, a dependence on cliche, that makes it seem trite.
Read Full Review
50
Washington Post Teresa Wiltz
Nothing much happens here, and even less is resolved. You could make an argument that that's how life is, unresolved, but as a film, it makes for frustrating viewing, particularly when plot threads with the potential to bust open the story are left hanging.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Qualifies as a mild success. It's an easy picture to like, even if it's not exactly satisfying.
Read Full Review
50
The New Yorker David Denby
The trouble with Holofcener's scheme is that the center of the movie is dead. Olivia has no drives or hopes or powerful regrets. She has nothing to say, and Aniston does most of her acting with her lower lip.
Read Full Review
50
Film Threat Don R. Lewis
Entertaining and highly watchable but in the end, it just feels trite.
Read Full Review
50
USA Today Claudia Puig
The film is likable, with some funny moments and recognizable human conflicts. But the origin of the women's friendship is not explained, and the nature of Olivia's problems is not examined or taken very seriously, making her seem inexplicably lost and shallow.
Read Full Review
50
Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
The cast is terrific, the movie isn't... It all plays like the pilot for a series that wasn't picked up.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
The movie lacks the warmth and edge of the two previous features ("Walking and Talking" and "Lovely and Amazing"). It seems to be more of an idea than a story.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 5.3 (out of 10) based on 44 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Roy S. gave it a3:
A boring waste of actors' talent and viewers' time. The film is dismal and incoherent.

Nancy W gave it a9:
[***SPOILERS***] I liked the open ended ending best left to the viewer to figure out what they would do next. I had not very high expectations when renting this movie, except I love Keener and McDormand so was happy this wasn't the typical chick flick!

BJ D. gave it a2:
Extremely Boring! The story never came together, it was looking into the lives of four people, but so what? The ending is horrible because it doesn't really end, you are still left wondering about the lives of four people. What a waste of talent, and my time.

Daryl S. gave it an8:
Yep it's not all nicely resolved at the end. I wanted to know more. And I fugre that, if I'm left feeling that way at the end of a movie, then it hasn't been at all bad.

Stephen S. gave it a7:
I feel as if people have marked this down slightly for the wrong kinds of reasons. It may be watched with perfect pleasure just as a large-brained chick-flick, but it is much more if you step inside the director’s space. There is quality in the four female leads–Keener and McDormand rarely disappoint, while I think Aniston is underrated–and their lesser-known male counterparts do well. Direction is sure and the dialogue sharp. Granted, it’s hard to point to any gut-wrenching “money scenes”, but there is in Holofcener’s gentle parable an underlying seriousness and critique. These are good friends, and good intelligent people, but theirs is also a disturbingly planetary myopia not alien to the rest of us First Worlders. They’re not quite like the proverbial frogs in the gradually heating saucepan of water, but there sure is something they’re missing.

Michael L. gave it an8:
Not everyone's cup of tea, no doubt, but I loved it. Excellent, thoroughly drawn characters and witty, 100% realistic dialog. These are people we all know--if we're over 40. I think the detractors from this film are gen X-ers; and I understand why. They haven't dealt with working so hard to achieve their goals...and succeeding. When the goal is reached, a confused emptiness can result. That's what makes this film so haunting. We step into 4 typical lives, and step out 90 minutes later. Like life, there are no answers, no resolutions. A great cast, particularly Frances McDormand and Catherine Keener, make this film highly watchable, and bring their complex characters to life.

Jim G. gave it a6:
More rich white peoples with problems. Finds some truth, but with characters only other rich white peoples could feel for.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | iPhone 3G | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use