Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

DVD

Upcoming Release Calendar
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Recent DVD/Video Releases

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Ghost

EMAILPRINTParamount Pictures

Ghost reviews
52
7.1 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 17 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 8 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Romance

Written by: Bruce Joel Rubin

Directed by: Jerry Zucker

Release Date:
Theatrical: July 13, 1990
DVD: April 24, 2001

Running Time: 128 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: R

Starring Patrick Swayze, Demi Moore, Whoopi Goldberg, Rick Aviles, Armelia McQueen, Vincent Schiavelli, and Gail Boggs

Patrick Swayze plays a ghost who teams with a psychic (Goldberg) to uncover the truth behind his murder - and to rescue his sweetheart (Moore) from a similar fate. (Paramount Pictures)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

A wonderful movie, sincere and inspired, with four terrific performances and a story that doesn't let up. The picture has the gentle, nourishing quality of a fairy tale that you want to believe, and the unsoftened impact of gut-level entertainment. [13 July 1990, Daily Datebook, p.E1]

88

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Jay Scott

It's an unpredictable, mesmerizing journey nearly every shady second of the way.

Read Full Review >
80

Empire Caroline Westbrook

It’s soppy and sentimental, and it’s no longer possible to take the famous pottery sequence seriously, but some neat special effects and a healthy dose of humour prevent it from becoming mawkish.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Tribune Dave Kehr

There are still some astonishingly tender moments, including looks exchanged between Swayze and Moore that seem magically divorced from this summer of exploding jets, severed limbs and homicidal children. [13 July 1990, Friday, p.D]

63

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

One of the irritations of Ghost is that the Moore character is such a slow study.

Read Full Review >
60

Washington Post Rita Kempley

Three losers of late, the actors succeed quite nicely in unifying the movie's multiple personalities, its ricocheting screenplay.

Read Full Review >
60

The New York Times Elvis Mitchell

Nothing if not earnest. It's also eccentric enough to remain interesting even when its ghost story isn't easy to believe.

Read Full Review >
60

TV Guide Staff (Non Credited)

A big sweet hit, tingly and glycerined in a phony way, but diverting.

Read Full Review >
50

Variety Staff (Not Credited)

An odd creation - at times nearly smothering in arty somberness, at others veering into good, wacky fun.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

There's something relentlessly superficial about the movie, and in one area that cries out for sensitivity - the treatment of racial differences among the characters - it falls down badly. [22 Aug 1990, Arts, p.11]

50

USA Today Susan Wloszczyna

Goldberg has her best role in a while, especially when she twitches and grunts her way into phony trances. Poor Demi, though, cries enough tears to drench a small drought-stricken state. [13 July 1990, Life, p.4D]

50

Washington Post Desson Thomson

It's formula-packed business as usual. In fact, it's double-packed, triple-packed, more.

Read Full Review >
40

Los Angeles Times Sheila Benson

In all his athletic scenes, leaping through doors, leaping between uptown and downtown trains, leaping on an assortment of villains, Swayze is just fine. It's the movie's big cosmic questions that throw him; for these he's reduced to a look of total stupefaction--not the movie's finest moments. [13 July 1990, Calendar, p.F-1]

40

The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann

The ghost is played by Patrick Swayze, who can't handle the part; his bereaved girlfriend, Demi Moore, is much better. [13 Aug 1990, p.30]

40

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

There's something offensive about the movie's chintzy view of death and the way it periodically flirts with promising conceits (i.e., Goldberg offering her body as a surrogate so that Swayze and Moore can "touch" one another) only to back away from them in as cowardly a manner as possible.

Read Full Review >
38

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Though saddled with hoary jokes, Goldberg at least pumps some funky life into the bland proceedings.

Read Full Review >
30

Time Richard Corliss

A bad movie that a lot of people will like... Though director Jerry Zucker wants his necrophiliac romance to be sensitive, he pumps up its feelings fortissimo so the dimmest viewer will get the point. [16 July 1990, p.86]

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 7.1 (out of 10) based on 8 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Emily gave it a 10:
I love it. Usually when i watch a movie i keep looking at the clock to see how long weve got left watching it but this time my eyes were fixed to the television taking in every moment and every word said. I beg to differ that the acting was rubbish. All those who have said such should stand up on a movie set and try to do any better. The movie was electric. The most moving scene was when whoopi let patrick enter her body and they started dancing to the music. The effects were good and so was the script writing. It was an origonal sentimental masterpiece. Well Done!

Andrew M gave it an 8:
The brilliance of this movie is that it makes you care whether you want to or not! Unless you're completely repelled by it, you will be affected. I saw this film long ago (well, 14 years ago, to be exact) when I was a naive 15-year-old, with my first serious girlfriend. It quickly became 'our' movie. When we first saw it, we laughed together, we 'jumped' together, we cried together, we hoped together. We returned the following weekend to watch it again, and feel everything all over again. It's a real tearjerker, and now in my 'old age', like most other blokes, I can say it's not really my sort of film. But I can't deny that when I saw all those years ago, I loved it. It's a great story, beautifully told, and it makes you really care! And if you can hold back tears at the end, you're must be made of stuff other than flesh and bone.

Pat C. gave it a 3:
We may pine for loved ones, but after watching this I thank God that they die and move on. Love comes from obscurity, becomes very special, then returns to that obscurity. If it couldn't do so, it wouldn't be very special. But not to worry. This cast trivialized the process simply by showing up.

Rene L. gave it an 8:
This movie is very touching. If you believe in life after death this movie shows it in a significant way.

Mitch M. gave it an 8:
I thought this movie was excellent in the theatre. I guess after the 40th time they showed it on TNT it got a little old....

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use