|
Upcoming Release Calendar
xx
Beer for My Horses Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
Godfather: Part III, The
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
MPAA RATING: R
Starring Al Pacino, Diane Keaton, Talia Shire, Andy Garcia, Sofia Coppola, Joe Mantegna, George Hamilton, and Bridget Fonda
In this third film in the epic Corleone trilogy, Al Pacino reprises the role of powerful family leader Michael Corleone. Now in his 60's, Michael is dominated by two passions: freeing his family from crime and finding a suitable successor. That successor could be fiery Vincent (Garcia)... but he may also be the spark that turns Michael's hope of business legitimacy into an inferno of mob violence. (Paramount)
| GENRE(S): | Drama |
| WRITTEN BY: |
Francis Ford Coppola
Mario Puzo |
| DIRECTED BY: | Francis Ford Coppola |
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: October 9, 2001 Video: May 6, 1997 Theatrical: December 25, 1990 |
| RUNNING TIME: | 162 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: | USA |
The film was nominated for seven Academy Awards.
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
The average user rating for this movie is 5.5 (out of 10) based on 32 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Hudson T gave it a9:
Not perfect, but certainly better than part two. Ultimately, after hearing about how everyone was so disappointed with three, I was surprised by how good it was.
Jared K. gave it a10:
Sofia Coppla isn't nough to ruin this. The cast is stellar!
James L. gave it a1:
This one is the weakest film of 1990. The acting is poor. And Sofia Coppola is mistaken for being cast in the movie. Andy Garcia played his part well. Call that the most powerful film? NOT!
Joyce C. gave it a0:
The first part fascinated me, the book is amazing, the film isn't as good, but part 2 wasn't as good, it was all right, but it never worked with Al Pacino. And this, Al Pacino is more tuff, grumpy, and more compromising, I found cheesy and terrible. Either it is good, all right, or terrible. Classics can be either of the three since I know what a classic is. And this is terrible.
JC A. gave it a0:
Sucky, although well acted, I can see Oscars many times being nominated for this film, but I don't like how there has to be a part 3, when all this does is add on from part 2. What a draggy cinematic poor film, and why Al Pacino? his age is done in part 2, I think Andy Garcia (also starring in this film) could play the godfather really well, just think about it.
Jarad C. gave it a0:
Completely boring, it has twists and turns, but it is so flat and hollow. Very disappointing.
James E gave it a9:
Not as good as the originals, but defiantly gripping and intense.

| Return to top of page |

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL
About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise
© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use