GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Halloween II
Universal Pictures

Halloween II reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 32 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.7 out of 10
based on 6 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 15 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R

Starring Jamie Lee Curtis, Donald Pleasence, Charles Cyphers, Tony Moran, Lance Guest, and Nancy Stephens

Picking up precisely where its predecessor left off, Halloween II follows the same ill-fated characters as they encounter the knife-wielding maniac they left for dead in the first Halloween. It seems the inhuman Michael Myers is still very much alive and out for more revenge as he stalks the deserted halls of the hospital where his sister lays waiting. As he gets closer and closer to his terrified target, Dr. Loomis discovers the chilling mystery behind the crazed psychopath's savage actions. (Universal)


GENRE(S): Horror  |  Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: John Carpenter
Debra Hill
 
DIRECTED BY: Rick Rosenthal  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: October 30, 1981 
Video: August 28, 2001 
Theatrical: October 30, 1981 
RUNNING TIME: 92 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Jay Scott
When it's good, it's because it's imitating its predecessor (but it suffers from tired spilled blood) and when it's bad, it's because it's imitating its own imitators.
Read Full Review
50
ReelViews James Berardinelli
With Halloween II, it was all about graphic, grisly murders and a high body count - lessons learned at the box office. And that disparity, more than anything else, illustrates why "Halloween" is a classic and its first sequel is a sloppy afterthought.
Read Full Review
40
Chicago Reader Dave Kehr
The visual style--the orange-and-blue color scheme, the elegant 'Scope compositions, the graceful tracking shots, and the shrewd use of shallow focus--has been reproduced almost perfectly from John Carpenter's original, yet the wit and intelligence are gone.
Read Full Review
30
Austin Chronicle Mike Emery
A bad sequel to a good movie...The main concentration is on gross-out effects and lame chase scenes.
Read Full Review
30
TV Guide Staff (Not Credited)
A totally unnecessary and extremely poor sequel to the original "Halloween". Although Dean Cundey's photography goes a long way toward recapturing the look of the first film, director Rick Rosenthal is no Carpenter, and the emphasis here is on graphic blood and gore rather than the skillful manipulation of the audience.
Read Full Review
10
Variety Staff (Not Credited)
There are incredibly almost never any really terrific scares in 92 minutes - just multiple shots of violence and gore that are more gruesome than anything else.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.7 (out of 10) based on 15 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Frank T gave it a2:
So much promise... such bad execution. Less thrills and more gore does not equal a good movie. Want a good Halloween sequel? Go get Halloween 4, H2O and the directors cut of 6.

Danny V. gave it a10:
Halloween II is an excellent horror film that stands aside from the original Halloween. However, Halloween II really never received the credit it was due. This is partly because most horror movies attract a young immature audience, and secondly related to the fact that John Carpenter did not direct and reincarnate Halloween. Aside from this, what Halloween II does show us is strong -continuity- from the original with a deeper storyline. This is one of the few sequels overall that nicely stands out on its own.

James B. gave it a0:
I think they could did much better they did excellent in part 1 why not this one? And can someone give me a little news on Halloween 9.Thanks.

Ribop R. gave it a0:
I didn't like it too much!!! But ha they say they might have a part 9 hopefully we'll enjoy it!!

Andrew M. gave it a 2:
I loved the original - it's one of the best horror films ever - but the sequel really is crap! As I mentioned in my comments for Halloween, it was so effective because of what you didn't see, rather than what you did. This first sequel forgets that entirely and just throws one grisly scene after another at you, none of which compare for scare-factor to those in the original. The whole film is just numbing, actually boring really! It doesn't evoke responses anything like the original. Gilbert was spot-on: if this movie scares you, the first one would probably kill you!

Rob W. gave it a 10:
This was the best of the sequels.

Layne gave it a 5:
A mediocre sequel with bad acting, cheap thrills, and a gritty onscreen look. It works though. It probably would have been better had the Halloween titlewave of the original resided before this film opened.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use