CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

DVD and Video

Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Recent Releases in DVD and Video

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



 

Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Hannibal
Universal Pictures

Hannibal reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 57 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.2 out of 10
based on 36 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 41 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for strong gruesome violence, some nudity and language

Starring Anthony Hopkins, Julianne Moore, Giancarlo Giannini, Francesca Neri, Alex Corrado, Gary Oldman, and Ray Liotta

Hannibal continues the story begun in "The Silence of the Lambs." Ten years have passed since Dr. Hannibal Lecter (Hopkins) escaped from custody, ten years since FBI Agent Clarice Starling (Moore) interviewed him in a maximum-security hospital for the criminally insane. The doctor is now at large in Italy, gloriously at liberty in an unguarded world. But Starling has never forgotten her encounters with Dr. Lecter -- his cold voice still haunts her dreams. (Universal Pictures)


GENRE(S): Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Thomas Harris (novel)
David Mamet
Steven Zaillian
 
DIRECTED BY: Ridley Scott  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: August 21, 2001 
Video: August 21, 2001 
Theatrical: February 9, 2001 
RUNNING TIME: 131 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

90
Time Richard Corliss
A banquet of creepy, gory or grotesque incidents is on display in Hannibal. but this superior sequel has romance in its dark heart.
90
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
It's unmissable, flaws and all, because riveting suspense spiced with diabolical laughs and garnished with a sprig of kinky romance add up to the tastiest dish around.
Read Full Review
88
Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach
Hannibal isn't art. But for filmgoers with a taste for the absurd and a tolerance for the blackest of black humor, it's one heck of a thrill ride.
83
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Hannibal lacks the rounded emotional elegance of ''The Silence of the Lambs'' (that was a great film; this one is merely good).
Read Full Review
80
Variety Todd McCarthy
The continuing saga of one of contemporary literature and cinema's most fascinating villains, as played once again with exquisite taste and riveting force by Anthony Hopkins.
Read Full Review
75
Boston Globe Jay Carr
''The Silence of the Lambs'' was a classic; Hannibal is only a good movie of its type.
75
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Hannibal, riding the malicious wit of Hopkins' sophisticated fiend, is a gorgeous, wild, sometimes sick thriller, a feast for enraptured eyes and strong stomachs.
75
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
It's best to just enjoy Hannibal for what it is: A decadent, elegant waltz about evil's seductive bloom. As sequels go, you could do a lot worse.
75
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Much of the action is as ponderous as it is predictable. Lector fans will get their fill, but be warned that the menu contains at least two scenes with over-the-top excesses that Hannibal himself might not want to swallow.
Read Full Review
70
Film.com Moira Macdonald
Unlike the original, Hannibal may make us hide our eyes, but it doesn't get inside our heads.
Read Full Review
70
Chicago Reader Lisa Alspector
Stylistic excess, comedy, and romance often help make extremes of cruelty and horror function as cathartic metaphor, and all three figure, not always successfully, in this sequel.
Read Full Review
70
Film.com Robert Horton
More complicated, more outrageous, less controlled in every way. But its owes its power to that earlier, greater film.
Read Full Review
67
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
It's gory, really gory, gratuitously and often inelegantly.
63
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
A carnival geek show elevated in the direction of art. It never quite gets there, but it tries with every fiber of its craft to redeem its pulp origins, and we must give it credit for the courage of its depravity.
Read Full Review
63
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
It's certainly not scary; it's not even suspenseful. The tension in Hannibal is purely sexual.
Read Full Review
63
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
The film goes from stylish to ghoulish to foolish.
63
New York Post Jonathan Foreman
Much has, and will, be made of the grisly scenes throughout the film.
63
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
Perhaps to compensate for the absence of compelling drama and tension (and a few continuity gaffes), Scott has retreated to his TV commercial roots and crammed Hannibal full of busy, art-directed visuals.
60
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
It is not bad on its own terms, and it is certainly engrossing, but it comes nowhere near the power and sordid glory of the original.
Read Full Review
60
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Even by its own dark standards, the movie's conclusion is as dramatically dissatisfying as it is disturbing.
Read Full Review
60
New York Magazine Peter Rainer
The audience for Hannibal is far more primed for a good time; if the film is a hit, it will be because Lecter has been cartoonized; his ghoulish panache, his double entendres about cannibalism, and his pet phrases like "goody-goody" and "okeydokey" all serve to make him a figure of fun.
Read Full Review
60
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Though Hannibal the movie is unresolved in ways the book is not, that isn't Mr. Hopkins's fault. He's still a star for all seasons, and seasonings.
60
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Though the movie is clearly meant to work on its own, the relationship between Starling and Lecter plays best if you're familiar with "Lambs."
Read Full Review
58
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
Has almost none of the nail-biting suspense and fascinating character interplay that made the original so authentically terrifying.
Read Full Review
50
Mr. Showbiz Kevin Maynard
Every frame of Scott's film is gorgeously lurid and baroque, but it just hangs there like bad art, even during the gore-spilling, Grand Guignol climax.
50
Village Voice J. Hoberman
Less monster than monstrosity—albeit, as superfluous sequels go, not on par with the memorably idiotic "Godfather III."
Read Full Review
50
The New York Times A.O. Scott
Hannibal, a silly though handsomely staged adaptation of the Thomas Harris novel directed by Ridley Scott, is a movie meant for the whole family -- the Manson family.
Read Full Review
50
Newsweek David Ansen
Strikingly devoid of suspense. It’s not always clear who’s the protagonist and who’s the antagonist. Nor is it scary—at its most intense moments, it’s merely yucky.
50
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Creepy and grotesque rather than terrifying. It's more distasteful than anything stronger, a sour bottle of a celebrated vintage that a gourmet like Lecter wouldn't hesitate to send back with the sommelier.
Read Full Review
50
Slate David Edelstein
"The Silence of the Lambs," was morbid but also a rich and satisfying serial-killer thriller—a cunning weave of the fairy tale, the forensic, and the fetishistic. Hannibal, on the other hand, is simply a fat slab of sadism.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
The picture is willfully gross, fundamentally stupid and in no way worth the discomfort of watching it. Yet it may be the most well-crafted piece of garbage this year.
Read Full Review
50
USA Today Mike Clark
Hopkins' Hannibal is no longer mysterious, Clarice is no longer vulnerable, and the overextended Florence scenes dash any hopes of early momentum, even if Giancarlo Giannini is perfect as the cop.
Read Full Review
40
LA Weekly Ella Taylor
The flabbiest of cop-outs. Moore gives a flat, spiritless performance, almost matched by that of Anthony Hopkins, who, notwithstanding the Armani threads, shuffles around like a pensioner in bedroom slippers.
Read Full Review
40
Dallas Observer Andy Klein
More than just a disappointment. It is also a spoiler, possibly weakening the impact of "Silence" for its fans.
Read Full Review
40
Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten
Misfires on so many levels that we have to wonder if there is more than one meaning to this story's wild boars.
Read Full Review
0
Salon.com Charles Taylor
Hannibal, which is very likely the worst film of this year and quite possibly the next, achieves what no movie I can recall ever even attempting: It somehow manages to be both repugnant and boring.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.2 (out of 10) based on 41 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

R. Dalvi gave it a5:
The brain scene is awful and disgusting. But Anthony hopkins' terrifc performance almost lifts it from the pits of mediocrity. Moore's charcter sketch is very poor though. but her performance is very good. Not as suspenseful as The Silence of the Lambs but has more gruesome violence than it. Also, Oldman is good but is not recognisable.

Anthony H gave it a10:
Wow! Dr. Lecter is still as freaky as ever. I especially loved the brain bit!

woo o. gave it a10:
Not as good as silence but an exciting sequel anyhow.

Andrew M. gave it a 5:
Not even in the same ballpark as its predecessor, however not without some effect. Whereas Silence Of The Lambs was an almost unbearably suspenseful film, smart and brooding, Hannibal is more just a gore film...but it succeeds in being that. That doesn't mean I liked it much! It was a slow film and not a very involving one. But, when it went for the big macabre knockouts, it delivered and was woozily stomach-turning!

Pat C. gave it a 4:
Missing the lonely fear that forced us to justify ourselves to re-establish psychic security. Resorts to the lamest device available for advancing a crime plot, stupid cops. So we are left with all the insanity, none of the surprises. This Hannibal dude must be caught and imprisoned, no, wait, that's how we got into this mess.

raVen gave it a 6:
As viewers, we don't hate Giancarlo Giannini's character enough to warrant such a grim fate. The movie punches you in the gut more than it tweaks with your head. All that's missing are a bearded lady and some man-eating pigs. Oh wait--it has those, too.

Hannibal L. gave it a 7:
the movie was'nt bad but it also was'nt good it was quite a clever movie though and that hannibal guy freaks me out!.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | iPhone 3G | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use